Propaganda Barbie and her "alternative facts" statement....

[WVPATX]

Did I say that???? Who is intellectually dishonest? The difference is the attack on "fake news" using lies...or ehm alternative facts. Did anyone for Obama use ANY of those terms?

I believe fake news is the province of both sides. Both sides play fake news yes including Obama's fake news. Do you want your health care plan keep your health care plan. Do you want your doctor keep your doctor. Isis is the JV team. All fake news.

Would you like me to get into all of Hillary's fake news?

 

[Boomboom521]

I believe fake news is the province of both sides. Both sides play fake news yes including Obama's fake news. Do you want your health care plan keep your health care plan. Do you want your doctor keep your doctor. Isis is the JV team. All fake news.

Would you like me to get into all of Hillary's fake news?

So now you're saying that when someone says something they believe but isn't true, it's fake news?

 

[Original Mountaineer1]

So he had the second highest viewership in 36 years and you diminish that fact? So very typical of a far left liberal. How many did your hero Billy boy Clinton have? How many did your beloved Obama have in 2012? Let me give you a clue, 10 million less.

When the press stops being corrupt, they will receive better treatment in the meantime they deserve everything they get. I actually thought you were a reasonable person until I read your Nazi comparison. Patently ridiculous and like I said intellectually lazy .

My mistake, I thought you had said it was the 2nd highest including Reagan. I did vote for Obama in 2008. I didn't in 2012. Voted for Mitt. Not a fan of Obama's foreign policy. Domestic policy was average. I was and am a ACA supporter but he lost me for good with the support of BLM criminal activity. I have stated this many times. Be surely wasn't my beloved Obama.

 

[WVPATX]

So now you're saying that when someone says something they believe but isn't true, it's fake news?

Give me a Flippin break. Obama knew exactly what lies he was telling. Hillary knew exactly what lies she was telling, you must either believe they are incredibly stupid or lying or perhaps both?

 

[Original Mountaineer1]

Did I say that???? Who is intellectually dishonest? The difference is the attack on "fake news" using lies...or ehm alternative facts. Did anyone for Obama use ANY of those terms?

Every American should have shuddered when Propaganda Barbie used that term; "alternative facts." There is no such thing as an alternative facts. Alternative theory yes....fact no. But to be fair to her, Spicer's fake rage put her in a tough spot.

 

[WVPATX]

My mistake, I thought you had said it was the 2nd highest including Reagan. I did vote for Obama in 2008. I didn't in 2012. Voted for Mitt. Not a fan of Obama's foreign policy. Domestic policy was average. I was and am a ACA supporter but he lost me for good with the support of BLM criminal activity. I have stated this many times. Be surely wasn't my beloved Obama.

You sure seem to be picking sides. I am no Trump fan but calling her a propagandist is a Nazi step too far. all of us tend to demonize people with whom we disagree. But the nazi comparison was completely unfair, especially with a thoroughly corrupt media.

 

[Boomboom521]

Give me a Flippin break. Obama knew exactly what lies he was telling. Hillary knew exactly what lies she was telling, you must either believe they are incredibly stupid or lying or perhaps both?

Like saying you'll release your tax returns after the audit is finished?

I think you haven't a clue what fake news is.
I think you have a dangerous trust of conservative politics.
I think you hate Obama and Clinton.
I think you love America.
I think you want liberals to become the new communism in America, and thus black balled from being a part of the political landscape.
I think you voted for someone you don't trust out of hate and frustration.
I think you watch too much FOX news.
I think you think you know way too much.
But what I THINK doesn't matter....but I don't want the press to be shredded so that only President Trump approved information is accepted.

 

[WVPATX]

Like saying you'll release your tax returns after the audit is finished?

I think you haven't a clue what fake news is.
I think you have a dangerous trust of conservative politics.
I think you hate Obama and Clinton.
I think you love America.
I think you want liberals to become the new communism in America, and thus black balled from being a part of the political landscape.
I think you voted for someone you don't trust out of hate and frustration.
I think you watch too much FOX news.
I think you think you know way too much.
But what I THINK doesn't matter....but I don't want the press to be shredded so that only President Trump approved information is accepted.

Then boom tell the press to be honest. Tell them the 91% negative coverage is corrupt. Tell them to do their job, report the facts and let the people decide. I agree that we need an independent media but if they are going to be so biased and so corrupt, they have a lost not only my faith but the faith of most of the American people. Have you seen their approval ratings lately, they're abysmal.

And fake news occurs on both sides whether you want to admit that or not. go back to Dan Rather and the bush story. Go back to the John McCain affair story in the New York Times. Go back to the Mitt Romney killing a woman with cancer story. Then all the lies that Obama and Hillary told that the media mouthpiece reported as fact. All fake news.

You must think the Liberals have a monopoly on virtue. Wake up boom, they do not. I admit Trump is an idiot. I admit he is the thin skinned and a narcissist. I admit he goes overboard. I never hear any issues regarding Obama from liberals. His lies, his deceit, his divisiveness. he lied about Benghazi. He lied about Obama care. He lied about ISIS. My God, wake up.

 

[atlkvb]

I have no idea how many people were there nor does it matter.

Who first put out that side-by-side comparison picture anyway? What even made it a controversy? I saw the photo, but why was it even necessary to do that, and who did it? WVU82 do you know? I first saw the pic after you posted it. Where did that come from?

 

[WVPATX]

Who first put out that side-by-side comparison picture anyway? What even made it a controversy? I saw the photo, but why was it even necessary to do that, and who did it? WVU82 do you know? I first saw the pic after you posted it. Where did that come from?

More importantly what was the timeframe of the Trump photo? They said it was roughly the same time but I showed pictures on this site that showing much much larger crowd. And we are supposed to trust the media to report accurately and fairly? What a joke.

 

[dave]

Not sure if this is more Orwellian or Nazi but disturbing nonetheless. Of course 46% of voters think this **** it cool. Just Donald being Donald......

Orwellian" is an adjective describing a situation, idea, or societal condition that George Orwell identified as being destructive to the welfare of a free and open society. It denotes an attitude and a brutal policy of draconian control by propaganda, surveillance, misinformation, denial of truth, and manipulation of the past, including the "unperson"—a person whose past existence is expunged from the public record and memory, practiced by modern repressive governments.

I wonder how butthurt the next crazy claum will be?

 

[dave]

The loons on the left loved being able to make whatever ridiculous claim they wanted knowing the media would have their back. Now it is ***** central when the shoe is on the other foot. Pardon me for laughing at the loons through their mentl breakdowns.

 

[Boomboom521]

Then boom tell the press to be honest. Tell them the 91% negative coverage is corrupt. Tell them to do their job, report the facts and let the people decide. I agree that we need an independent media but if they are going to be so biased and so corrupt, they have a lost not only my faith but the faith of most of the American people. Have you seen their approval ratings lately, they're abysmal.

And fake news occurs on both sides whether you want to admit that or not. go back to Dan Rather and the bush story. Go back to the John McCain affair story in the New York Times. Go back to the Mitt Romney killing a woman with cancer story. Then all the lies that Obama and Hillary told that the media mouthpiece reported as fact. All fake news.

You must think the Liberals have a monopoly on virtue. Wake up boom, they do not. I admit Trump is an idiot. I admit he is the thin skinned and a narcissist. I admit he goes overboard. I never hear any issues regarding Obama from liberals. His lies, his deceit, his divisiveness. he lied about Benghazi. He lied about Obama care. He lied about ISIS. My God, wake up.

My God wake up: liberal bias: (talking about Trumps crowd in the first place- who cares), fake news (lying about the pictures).

Stop connecting the two. I wouldn't call FOX fake news, I've called their coverage biased and bad. Mixing the two is a strategy by President Trump and Bannon to destroy credibilty and create controlled sources of information.

 

[atlkvb]

More importantly what was the timeframe of the Trump photo? They said it was roughly the same time but I showed pictures on this site that showing much much larger crowd. And we are supposed to trust the media to report accurately and fairly? What a joke.

I was thinking the same thing. If that Trump pic was taken well before the festivities started, what's the point in making the comparison? What did that Mall look like as the ceremony was underway? Big difference I'd imagine, but I'm not sure?

I do know this, the media is certainly more obsessed with the size of this particular Trump crowd than they ever were about any of his huge rallies during the campaign. They almost never mentioned or hardly ever showed his massive crowds...and Trump used to always call them out for that too.

 

[atlkvb]

I wouldn't call FOX fake news, I've called their coverage biased and bad.

Boom would you call CNN fair and balanced?

 

[WVPATX]

My God wake up: liberal bias: (talking about Trumps crowd in the first place- who cares), fake news (lying about the pictures).

Stop connecting the two. I wouldn't call FOX fake news, I've called their coverage biased and bad. Mixing the two is a strategy by President Trump and Bannon to destroy credibilty and create controlled sources of information.

Boom, with all due respect the credibility of the media was destroyed long before Trump. They were further destroyed with her 91% negative coverage, wake up. That is blatant corruption. Trust in the media has been going down and down and down for years, well deserved I might add

 

[WVU82_rivals]

Who first put out that side-by-side comparison picture anyway? What even made it a controversy? I saw the photo, but why was it even necessary to do that, and who did it? WVU82 do you know? I first saw the pic after you posted it. Where did that come from?

cnn ran it as LIVE when in reality it was 3 hours previous...

Worst lie of the year from cnn... so far.

 

[WVPATX]

I was thinking the same thing. If that Trump pic was taken well before the festivities started, what's the point in making the comparison? What did that Mall look like as the ceremony was underway? Big difference I'd imagine, but I'm not sure?

I do know this, the media is certainly more obsessed with the size of this particular Trump crowd than they ever were about any of his huge rallies during the campaign. They almost never mentioned or hardly ever showed his massive crowds...and Trump used to always call them out for that too.

Notice I have not seen any reporter from the mainstream media report the size of the TV audience for trumps inauguration. Hang it on the pictures which were proven false with the pictures that I posted. As Trump said, the crowd stretched back to the Washington Monument.

 

[wvu2007]

I love that liberals keep defending the media even when they lie. They are just contributing to more conservative victories in the future. Thanks liberals!

 

[atlkvb]

If the press had honestly covered Obama instead of letting everybody know that they got a tingle up their leg when he spoke, maybe the press would be viewed in better light.

It was worse than that Airport. If you criticized him on policy, you were called a racist. There was no room to disagree substantively with him on anything without being labeled a racist. Both the Left and the Media repeated that charge so often most folks just stopped criticizing, including the Republicans.

 

[atlkvb]

Hang it on the pictures which were proven false with the pictures that I posted.

Can you post those again PAX, I have not seen them.

 

[dave]

This is what liberalism looks like when it is out of power. Lies, bigger lies, protests and violence.

 

[atlkvb]

cnn ran it as LIVE when in reality it was 3 hours previous...

Worst lie of the year from cnn... so far.

You know for a fact that photo CNN put out that you posted was 3 hours ahead of the actual ceremony?

 

[Boomboom521]

Boom would you call CNN fair and balanced?

No. The bias is obvious (hence the posting of the side by side photos) but I think they take reporting facts seriously

 

[WVPATX]

Can you post those again PAX, I have not seen them.[/QUOTE


https://theconservativetreehouse.co...guration-speech-confirms-sean-spicer-correct/

 

[atlkvb]

No. The bias is obvious (hence the posting of the side by side photos) but I think they take reporting facts seriously

Did they report on those project Veritas videos I linked you to?

 

[atlkvb]

OK, Wow! I have not seen that photo.

Amazing.

 

[WVPATX]

No. The bias is obvious (hence the posting of the side by side photos) but I think they take reporting facts seriously

Boom, please name one anchor on CNN that is unbiased. I think Tapper is this closest they get. And in his past he was a Democrat operative

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[atlkvb]

This is just another example of them "lying with the Truth". Until you and PAX posted this pic WVU82, I honestly thought that side-by-side comparison was the actual photo of Trump's crowd.

I should have known better. I didn't think it was such a big deal anyway because as I said the media has never been interested in any crowd Trump draws until now.

But looking at this photo, and the one PAX posted, it is clear there was a deliberate attempt to make Trump's crowds out to be smaller than they were.

Disgusting.

 

[WVPATX]

In the mainstream media claimed the crowd did not back up to the Washington Monument. They are historic liars.

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

Notice I have not seen any reporter from the mainstream media report the size of the TV audience for trumps inauguration.

"Alternative facts".

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/...nauguration-drew-30-million-viewers/96901754/

 

[WVPATX]

"Alternative facts".

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/...nauguration-drew-30-million-viewers/96901754/

You're Posting an opinion from a liberal journalist and you claim that is fact?

 

[atlkvb]

In the mainstream media claimed the crowd did not back up to the Washington Monument. They are historic liars.

I have not seen one media report showing this photo. Not one. I watched the 1st story on ABC's Good Morning America, I saw a portion of Meet the Press because I wanted to hear Kelly Ann's response to the controversy, and I caught the first 10 minutes of This Week, where they showed that same side-by-side WVU82 posted for us, and they time captured it as just before the actual ceremony. (around the same time as Obama's photo)

I've never seen this photo, and no one has shown it.

 

[atlkvb]

cnn ran it as LIVE when in reality it was 3 hours previous...

Worst lie of the year from cnn... so far.

There must be some way someone can verify what time CNN captured their photo? The ones you and PAX posted look nothing like that one.

What a bunch of scurrilous sycophants.

 

[Boomboom521]

In the mainstream media claimed the crowd did not back up to the Washington Monument. They are historic liars.

See the white, then look at the overhead photo. I don't think it's bs, just a different angle

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

You're Posting an opinion from a liberal journalist and you claim that is fact?

No I pointed out that you were wrong...again. Mainstream media covered the television viewers, contrary to your statement.

You are a complete idiot.

 

[WVPATX]

See the white, then look at the overhead photo. I don't think it's bs, just a different angle

You're deceiving once again. As I explained you in a previous post the park service put down white padding to protect the grass. Green grass does not show up nearly as well in photographs as white padding. angles are very similar.

 

[WVPATX]

No I pointed out that you were wrong...again. Mainstream media covered the television viewers, contrary to your statement.

You are a complete idiot.

Would you like to place a big wager on if those emails are made available or not? Put your money where your big, fat mouth is.

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

Would you like to place a big wager on if those emails are made available or not? Put your money where your big, fat mouth is.

They have to redact individual names.

I'll bet you all the money in the world that they won't release individual names. It is illegal.

There are middle school kids that are more intelligent than you. Start googling federal laws against targeting individuals based on political purposes.