RATM in Minneapolis

[amynhop]

By all means, stop wasting your time here.

How many times have you quoted my post in this thread? 5? 6?

You have aDS. ( amy Derangement Syndrome)

Living rent free….

 

[RichOne420]

To be honest I meant for that comment to be towards another poster. I had to go back and read this entire thread, damn you.
That said, you'll do!
I laughed at all your comments. Lettuce think for a minute.... you're between the ages of 20-35. Still have ask your parents for money on occasion for a date you found on tender. Close?

I'm 50 and smh at you blind sheep that venomously support the 2 party system. If the DOJ would do their job and release the unredacted Epstein files it will be a glorious day watching both pastures make excuses for why they've been supporting pedophiles. It will also expose the elites from all o er the world. Those that push the divisionist propaganda to the weak minded. Same kind that has you assuming the dumbest of **** because you don't have the mental fortitude to debate with someone that is anti-establishment. If you feel you're capable I am here for it.

 

[FLaw47]

I'm 50 and smh at you blind sheep that venomously support the 2 party system. If the DOJ would do their job and release the unredacted Epstein files it will be a glorious day watching both pastures make excuses for why they've been supporting pedophiles. It will also expose the elites from all o er the world. Those that push the divisionist propaganda to the weak minded. Same kind that has you assuming the dumbest of **** because you don't have the mental fortitude to debate with someone that is anti-establishment. If you feel you're capable I am here for it.

Worth pointing out here that the "2 party system" isn't something that our Constitution requires, it's just an inevitable result of the way our elections work.

If people want to hop on the Mixed Member Proportional Representation train with me, though, the sky is the limit!

 

[LafayetteBear]

I was very respectful until what’s his name posted an outright lie and called me stupid.

Truth is an absolute defense to a slander charge, so "what's his name" is home free.

 

[LafayetteBear]

Liberalism is about helping others? Lol. Did you help, march or put up billboards for any of the women murdered by illegals? Did you say a prayer for their families? Many in your party cheered when Charlie Kirk was murdered.

And let me get this straight…your party supports murdering a baby and many support that at full term but it’s “inhumane “ to deport illegals from MN? Spare me your sanctimonious BS. The Left outrage is always selective and phony. Anything to promote their evil, radical agenda. I don’t need to reflect on anything. I know my values and the direction I want this country. Too bad Trump can’t run a third term….

In the end times , good will be called evil and evil will be called good…..Happening NOW.

1. "I know my values and the direction I want this country." That jumble of words does not make English sense. Try again.
2. "The left" has an "evil, radical agenda." On top of being serial "blasphemers" and "baby murderers" as well? And "the end times" are "happening NOW?" Well, I guess we're really screwed, then. Nostradamus. BTW, who's the Antichrist, Jimmy Kimmel? Adam Schiff? Gavin Newsom?
3. This is a politics Board, not a football board. You did not understand that?! If you want to continue posting here, you should consider trying to develop a thicker skin instead of threatening to report everyone with whom you disagree to Chris Ash. Or, I suppose you could pronounce anathema on and excommunicate all of us. I'm sure that will work wonders.

 

[amynhop]

1. "I know my values and the direction I want this country." That jumble of words does not make English sense. Try again.
2. "The left" has an "evil, radical agenda." On top of being serial "blasphemers" and "baby murderers" as well? And "the end times" are "happening NOW?" Well, I guess we're really screwed, then. Nostradamus. BTW, who's the Antichrist, Jimmy Kimmel? Adam Schiff? Gavin Newsom?
3. This is a politics Board, not a football board. You did not understand that?! If you want to continue posting here, you should consider trying to develop a thicker skin instead of threatening to report everyone with whom you disagree to Chris Ash. Or, I suppose you could pronounce anathema on and excommunicate all of us. I'm sure that will work wonders.

First of all, when I responded to this thread, it was in the West Zone. Not in the House of Politics ! Second of all, it’s Chris Ard. Not Ash. Third, I didn’t tag Chris because someone disagreed with me, it was name calling and vulgarity. All against the rules according to On3. But this board is like the NCAA…no damn rules are ever enforced. And I’m like Dabo…pleading for them to be enforced.

My skin is thick enough to be disagreed with respectfully. It is my strong opinion that I should be able to state my thoughts and not be insulted by a bunch of clowns attacking a woman all while hiding behind a keyboard. Big tough guys.

Trump ain’t perfect but I’m on board with the direction he’s taking my country. His policies and direction suit my values and what I believe in. I guess you have a problem with reading comprehension since PLAIN ENGLISH SUCH AS THIS IS A JUMBLE OF WORDS TO YOU AND DOESN’T MAKE SENSE. Maybe get yourself an English tutor?

And lastly, you’re right on one thing. Truth is someone’s defense but what’s his name lied about me saying Putin was a good guy…that’s libel.

Edit: Maybe next time read a thread ( or at least what pertains to the person you’re trying to attack) because you just typed a bunch of , and have no idea what you’re talking about. I’m smarter than you. And smart enough to know that you were condescendingly saying what’s his name was in the clear because he called me stupid.

 

[Trading Tiger]

Ok, so I know this is a bit of a risky post, and I am NOT aiming for anything political, but Tom Morello performed in Minneapolis yesterday and I thought this was objectively pretty cool. I’m sure this will eventually get RT’d, but start your Saturday with some metal

Skip to about 2:10 to get past Morello’s political stuff

RATM was great back in the 90's when it was cool to be liberal. But now that the liberals want to silence everyone, and kill those who will not be silent, they're stupid not to see the goldmine they are standing in front of.

Even if they didn't do it for the money, they could show everybody that they actually have values and principles.

But nope, if they were smarter they'd be hypocrites, but they are just too stupid for that.

**** you I'll just do what you tell me!

 

[RichOne420]

First of all, when I responded to this thread, it was in the West Zone. Not in the House of Politics ! Second of all, it’s Chris Ard. Not Ash. Third, I didn’t tag Chris because someone disagreed with me, it was name calling and vulgarity. All against the rules according to On3. But this board is like the NCAA…no damn rules are ever enforced. And I’m like Dabo…pleading for them to be enforced.

My skin is thick enough to be disagreed with respectfully. It is my strong opinion that I should be able to state my thoughts and not be insulted by a bunch of clowns attacking a woman all while hiding behind a keyboard. Big tough guys.

Trump ain’t perfect but I’m on board with the direction he’s taking my country. His policies and direction suit my values and what I believe in. I guess you have a problem with reading comprehension since PLAIN ENGLISH SUCH AS THIS IS A JUMBLE OF WORDS TO YOU AND DOESN’T MAKE SENSE. Maybe get yourself an English tutor?

And lastly, you’re right on one thing. Truth is someone’s defense but what’s his name lied about me saying Putin was a good guy…that’s libel.

Edit: Maybe next time read a thread ( or at least what pertains to the person you’re trying to attack) because you just typed a bunch of , and have no idea what you’re talking about. I’m smarter than you. And smart enough to know that you were condescendingly saying what’s his name was in the clear because he called me stupid.

Worth pointing out here that the "2 party system" isn't something that our Constitution requires, it's just an inevitable result of the way our elections work.

If people want to hop on the Mixed Member Proportional Representation train with me, though, the sky is the limit!

When 90% of US voters are sheep that only choose between the Left and Right, we live in a dumbed down society full of blind supporters.

 

[moradatiger70]

I'm 50 and smh at you blind sheep that venomously support the 2 party system. If the DOJ would do their job and release the unredacted Epstein files it will be a glorious day watching both pastures make excuses for why they've been supporting pedophiles. It will also expose the elites from all o er the world. Those that push the divisionist propaganda to the weak minded. Same kind that has you assuming the dumbest of **** because you don't have the mental fortitude to debate with someone that is anti-establishment. If you feel you're capable I am here for it.

Go for it. I may be more anti-establishment than you think.

 

[FLaw47]

When 90% of US voters are sheep that only choose between the Left and Right, we live in a dumbed down society full of blind supporters.

Yeah, I can't take this positon seriously. There are only two parties that have any hope of winning in most elections and the candidates from other parties are almost always worse than at least one of the "two party" candidates. I'm sure there are exceptions but I'm not immediately remembering any.

 

[PawPride]

RATM was great back in the 90's when it was cool to be liberal. But now that the liberals want to silence everyone, and kill those who will not be silent, they're stupid not to see the goldmine they are standing in front of.

Even if they didn't do it for the money, they could show everybody that they actually have values and principles.

But nope, if they were smarter they'd be hypocrites, but they are just too stupid for that.

**** you I'll just do what you tell me!

This is ******* hysterical

 

[bdgan]

I'm 50 and smh at you blind sheep that venomously support the 2 party system. If the DOJ would do their job and release the unredacted Epstein files it will be a glorious day watching both pastures make excuses for why they've been supporting pedophiles. It will also expose the elites from all o er the world. Those that push the divisionist propaganda to the weak minded. Same kind that has you assuming the dumbest of **** because you don't have the mental fortitude to debate with someone that is anti-establishment. If you feel you're capable I am here for it.

You're proving the point I made before congress voted to have the Epstein files released.

1. The whole exercise is a waste of taxpayer money.
2. They won't find anything that proves people guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
3. Anti Trumper's won't be happy no matter what gets released. They'll claim that the important stuff was redacted or not released.

So far the biggest thing is that Gates got STD from Russian girls. This is from two draft emails dated July 18, 2013, written from Epstein’s own email address back to the same account, with no indication they were ever sent or that Gates received them. Neither message is signed, and no email belonging to Gates appears in the material. So there's no proof that this is true or if the girls were underage. If the goal was to publicly embarrass people you might call this a success. Not so much if your goal was to find evidence of illegal activity.

3 million pages, 180k images, and 2k videos but people will still claim that evidence of Trump wrongdoing exists in the 4th million document that wasn't released.

 

[tigres88]

You're proving the point I made before congress voted to have the Epstein files released.

1. The whole exercise is a waste of taxpayer money.
2. They won't find anything that proves people guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
3. Anti Trumper's won't be happy no matter what gets released. They'll claim that the important stuff was redacted or not released.

So far the biggest thing is that Gates got STD from Russian girls. This is from two draft emails dated July 18, 2013, written from Epstein’s own email address back to the same account, with no indication they were ever sent or that Gates received them. Neither message is signed, and no email belonging to Gates appears in the material. So there's no proof that this is true or if the girls were underage. If the goal was to publicly embarrass people you might call this a success. Not so much if your goal was to find evidence of illegal activity.

3 million pages, 180k images, and 2k videos but people will still claim that evidence of Trump wrongdoing exists in the 4th million document that wasn't released.

Just a reminder- the entire Epstein Files thing was a conspiracy theory from the far right in the far corners of the internet, MAGA latched onto it and made it a part of their ethos, and Trump adopted it into his campaign as a major selling point.

The ONLY reason the left even talks about them is because MAGA was so incredibly loud about them, and Trump and his cronies doubled down on that conspiracy theory, and then did get a complete 180 on their released he promised. That's suspicious any way you want to spin it.

I'm on record on this forum from like January its all a big ado about nothing, and probably just a conspiracy theory and got mocked by the right wingers including @fatpiggy about it. Conspiracy theories are typically just bs.

However, this admin has done nothing but be sketch about their release after spending 5 years building it up as if they were above reproach and would spill all.

 

[Dadar]

First of all, when I responded to this thread, it was in the West Zone. Not in the House of Politics ! Second of all, it’s Chris Ard. Not Ash. Third, I didn’t tag Chris because someone disagreed with me, it was name calling and vulgarity. All against the rules according to On3. But this board is like the NCAA…no damn rules are ever enforced. And I’m like Dabo…pleading for them to be enforced.

My skin is thick enough to be disagreed with respectfully. It is my strong opinion that I should be able to state my thoughts and not be insulted by a bunch of clowns attacking a woman all while hiding behind a keyboard. Big tough guys.

Trump ain’t perfect but I’m on board with the direction he’s taking my country. His policies and direction suit my values and what I believe in. I guess you have a problem with reading comprehension since PLAIN ENGLISH SUCH AS THIS IS A JUMBLE OF WORDS TO YOU AND DOESN’T MAKE SENSE. Maybe get yourself an English tutor?

And lastly, you’re right on one thing. Truth is someone’s defense but what’s his name lied about me saying Putin was a good guy…that’s libel.

Edit: Maybe next time read a thread ( or at least what pertains to the person you’re trying to attack) because you just typed a bunch of , and have no idea what you’re talking about. I’m smarter than you. And smart enough to know that you were condescendingly saying what’s his name was in the clear because he called me stupid.

Why are you still here?

 

[Dadar]

RATM was great back in the 90's when it was cool to be liberal. But now that the liberals want to silence everyone, and kill those who will not be silent, they're stupid not to see the goldmine they are standing in front of.

Even if they didn't do it for the money, they could show everybody that they actually have values and principles.

But nope, if they were smarter they'd be hypocrites, but they are just too stupid for that.

**** you I'll just do what you tell me!

You appear to be an idiot.

 

[RichOne420]

Yeah, I can't take this positon seriously. There are only two parties that have any hope of winning in most elections and the candidates from other parties are almost always worse than at least one of the "two party" candidates. I'm sure there are exceptions but I'm not immediately remembering any.

Hard for you to even learn about other candidates when the system doesn't let them debate the 2 hand picked puppets. Over 100 years of proof that the D's and R's never do anything in support of the people. The closest one to break the establishment was Kennedy. He was going to expose Israel amongst other dark secrets.

 

[RichOne420]

Go for it. I may be more anti-establishment than you think.

Your likes and comments suggest otherwise. Shall we start with Israel and the Rothschild? Once they were able to infiltrate our government the people lost all power. Now we live in a matrix where over 90% of US voters believe they need government and that the establishment has all the power.

I'd also love to touch on our corrupt Healthcare system and how Big Pharma owns the whole thing with zero fear of consequences. We can wait to speak on that though.

 

[FLaw47]

Hard for you to even learn about other candidates when the system doesn't let them debate the 2 hand picked puppets. Over 100 years of proof that the D's and R's never do anything in support of the people. The closest one to break the establishment was Kennedy. He was going to expose Israel amongst other dark secrets.

It may have been hard to learn about these other candidates pre internet. Now it's not and what I've easily learned is that they're not serious people or serious parties.

 

[RichOne420]

You're proving the point I made before congress voted to have the Epstein files released.

1. The whole exercise is a waste of taxpayer money.
2. They won't find anything that proves people guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
3. Anti Trumper's won't be happy no matter what gets released. They'll claim that the important stuff was redacted or not released.

So far the biggest thing is that Gates got STD from Russian girls. This is from two draft emails dated July 18, 2013, written from Epstein’s own email address back to the same account, with no indication they were ever sent or that Gates received them. Neither message is signed, and no email belonging to Gates appears in the material. So there's no proof that this is true or if the girls were underage. If the goal was to publicly embarrass people you might call this a success. Not so much if your goal was to find evidence of illegal activity.

3 million pages, 180k images, and 2k videos but people will still claim that evidence of Trump wrongdoing exists in the 4th million document that wasn't released.

You obviously have spent zero time looking at what has been released. Trump is mentioned the 2nd most only behind Israel. You can't let MSM or social media tell you what to believe. You have to actually read through them yourself. In the recently released documents Trump is accused of raping kids and talking about killing kids. The emails are very graphic.

Once the DOJ quits protecting the pedophiles we will have access to the unredacted files. Of course the Elites are having the files released with victims names and pics unredacted while the monsters are covered up. This isn't by accident. And the DOJ is 1000% responsible.

 

[RichOne420]

It may have been hard to learn about these other candidates pre internet. Now it's not and what I've easily learned is that they're not serious people or serious parties.

Name them because I'm calling BS. You're trying to sell me on the idea that nobody was better than Trump and Kamala? Trump and Biden? Trump and Hillary? If you're going to have this discussion with me you better have receipts or you will just look foolish making lazy false claims.

 

[FLaw47]

Name them because I'm calling BS. You're trying to sell me on the idea that nobody was better than Trump and Kamala? Trump and Biden? Trump and Hillary? If you're going to have this discussion with me you better have receipts or you will just look foolish making lazy false claims.

Marianne Williamson, Ralph Nader, Jill Stein, Cornell West, and Gary Johnson all jump to mind as god awful candidates who were all worse than literally every Democrat that's run in my lifetime. Which candidate do YOU think was legitimately good? You're the one making a positive claim, name one 3rd party presidential candidate who was legitimately the best choice in that election.

 

[bdgan]

You obviously have spent zero time looking at what has been released. Trump is mentioned the 2nd most only behind Israel. You can't let MSM or social media tell you what to believe. You have to actually read through them yourself. In the recently released documents Trump is accused of raping kids and talking about killing kids. The emails are very graphic.

Once the DOJ quits protecting the pedophiles we will have access to the unredacted files. Of course the Elites are having the files released with victims names and pics unredacted while the monsters are covered up. This isn't by accident. And the DOJ is 1000% responsible.

Mostly old news about anonymous "tips" that couldn't be proven. One was a lawsuit that was quickly dismissed.

DOJ statement that you'll consider dishonest: "Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already. Nevertheless, out of our commitment to the law and transparency, the DOJ is releasing these documents with the legally required protections for Epstein’s victims"

Regarding you comment "Once the DOJ quits protecting the pedophiles we will have access to the unredacted files": Epstein's crimes have been investigated for more than 20 years. That goes Back to Bush, Obama, and Biden in addition to Trump but somehow you believe that only the Trump DOJ is covering for pedophiles. You seem to think all previous DOJs were just being nice to Trump or that they were somehow prohibited from disclosing proven claims against him. I think that you believe what you want to believe without regard to actual proof or corroboration.

 

[amynhop]

Mostly old news about anonymous "tips" that couldn't be proven. One was a lawsuit that was quickly dismissed.

DOJ statement that you'll consider dishonest: "Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already. Nevertheless, out of our commitment to the law and transparency, the DOJ is releasing these documents with the legally required protections for Epstein’s victims"

Regarding you comment "Once the DOJ quits protecting the pedophiles we will have access to the unredacted files": Epstein's crimes have been investigated for more than 20 years. That goes Back to Bush, Obama, and Biden in addition to Trump but somehow you believe that only the Trump DOJ is covering for pedophiles. You seem to think all previous DOJs were just being nice to Trump or that they were somehow prohibited from disclosing proven claims against him. I think that you believe what you want to believe without regard to actual proof or corroboration.

Exactly. That’s because he has TDS. Idiocy calling Trump a pedophile. Funny how he was never accused of any of these things until he ran for President.

 

[nytigerfan]

Mostly old news about anonymous "tips" that couldn't be proven. One was a lawsuit that was quickly dismissed.

DOJ statement that you'll consider dishonest: "Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already. Nevertheless, out of our commitment to the law and transparency, the DOJ is releasing these documents with the legally required protections for Epstein’s victims"

Regarding you comment "Once the DOJ quits protecting the pedophiles we will have access to the unredacted files": Epstein's crimes have been investigated for more than 20 years. That goes Back to Bush, Obama, and Biden in addition to Trump but somehow you believe that only the Trump DOJ is covering for pedophiles. You seem to think all previous DOJs were just being nice to Trump or that they were somehow prohibited from disclosing proven claims against him. I think that you believe what you want to believe without regard to actual proof or corroboration.

I have no doubt that powerful people on both sides are being protected. But these were active investigations during Obama and Biden's presidencies.

I don't think the both sides argument works when you look at this timeline:

Trump/republicans (2024): the Epstein files need to be released, they are full of Dems and Dem donors committing pedophilia.

Trump/republicans (2025): here are some binders with the Epstein files. It is all the information that has already been released.

Trump/republicans (2025): There are no epstein files, stop talking about it.

Trump/republicans (2025): OK, there are Epstein files, but they are a hoax. They were written by Obama and Biden.

Trump/republicans (2025): OK fine, the files are not a hoax, but releasing them will only harm the victims and innocent people.

Trump/republicans (2025): OK fine, since you are forcing us to release them, we will. They will exonerate Trump, who is the 2nd most mentioned name in the files, and any Democrats mentioned are guilty and must testify about it.

 

[RichOne420]

Marianne Williamson, Ralph Nader, Jill Stein, Cornell West, and Gary Johnson all jump to mind as god awful candidates who were all worse than literally every Democrat that's run in my lifetime. Which candidate do YOU think was legitimately good? You're the one making a positive claim, name one 3rd party presidential candidate who was legitimately the best choice in that election.

Jo Jorgesen. Gary Johnson was far from a liberal which really kills your assertion that you actually do research on 3rd party candidates. The fact that you also still consider any of the D's and R's better options also kills your thought process in the matter. Just admit you get your info from MSM and choose the "better of 2 evils" like the other sheep claim.

 

[RichOne420]

Mostly old news about anonymous "tips" that couldn't be proven. One was a lawsuit that was quickly dismissed.

DOJ statement that you'll consider dishonest: "Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already. Nevertheless, out of our commitment to the law and transparency, the DOJ is releasing these documents with the legally required protections for Epstein’s victims"

Regarding you comment "Once the DOJ quits protecting the pedophiles we will have access to the unredacted files": Epstein's crimes have been investigated for more than 20 years. That goes Back to Bush, Obama, and Biden in addition to Trump but somehow you believe that only the Trump DOJ is covering for pedophiles. You seem to think all previous DOJs were just being nice to Trump or that they were somehow prohibited from disclosing proven claims against him. I think that you believe what you want to believe without regard to actual proof or corroboration.

Continue supporting a pedophile if you'd like. You sheep will turn a blind eye and make excuses to keep from just admitting you got it wrong. You use excuses for Trump yet want the Clintons hung for them being mentioned in the same documents. You aren't mentioned in these files this much without being guilty of something.

 

[RichOne420]

Exactly. That’s because he has TDS. Idiocy calling Trump a pedophile. Funny how he was never accused of any of these things until he ran for President.

There are literal court cases of underage kids accusing him. There are also young women that have filed suit for rape against him. These happened long before Trump ran for president. In fact some were filed when the whole country associated Trump with his best friends the Clintons. You are just a simple minded fool that ignores the truth.

 

[bdgan]

Continue supporting a pedophile if you'd like. You sheep will turn a blind eye and make excuses to keep from just admitting you got it wrong. You use excuses for Trump yet want the Clintons hung for them being mentioned in the same documents. You aren't mentioned in these files this much without being guilty of something.

Apparently the Obama & Biden DOJs were supporting pedophiles. Same with the main stream media and fact checkers.

P.S. I never said I wanted to hang Clinton. I said:

• This has been investigated for 20 years and if they had something on Trump it would be all over the media.
• That anybody of notoriety who was affiliated with Epstein would be mentioned and have their reputations dragged through the mud even if there is no proof of guilt.
• Criminal charges are unlikely and the whole thing will have been a big waste of money (unless you think it's worth it to use unproven claims to smear your political opponents).

 

[bdgan]

There are literal court cases of underage kids accusing him. There are also young women that have filed suit for rape against him. These happened long before Trump ran for president. In fact some were filed when the whole country associated Trump with his best friends the Clintons. You are just a simple minded fool that ignores the truth.

And those cases were dismissed for lack of evidence.

 

[FLaw47]

Jo Jorgesen. Gary Johnson was far from a liberal which really kills your assertion that you actually do research on 3rd party candidates. The fact that you also still consider any of the D's and R's better options also kills your thought process in the matter. Just admit you get your info from MSM and choose the "better of 2 evils" like the other sheep claim.

What does Gary Johnson being far from a liberal have to do with anything?

I liked Joe Biden better on every position than Jo Jorgensen. I also can't tell if Jo Jorgensen had ever been elected to something before. So I don't find her to be in any way an exception to my claim.

 

[moradatiger70]

Your likes and comments suggest otherwise. Shall we start with Israel and the Rothschild? Once they were able to infiltrate our government the people lost all power. Now we live in a matrix where over 90% of US voters believe they need government and that the establishment has all the power.

I'd also love to touch on our corrupt Healthcare system and how Big Pharma owns the whole thing with zero fear of consequences. We can wait to speak on that though.

I never understood how people can keep up with likes, but whatever.

Do I have real concerns about corporate lobbying, political corruption, media incentives, elite influence, of course but linking ‘Israel’ or the Rothschilds to secret control narratives is a well‑known antisemitic trope.

Of course, the HC system is corrupt. There is a plan out there to fix some of it.

 

[amynhop]

There are literal court cases of underage kids accusing him. There are also young women that have filed suit for rape against him. These happened long before Trump ran for president. In fact some were filed when the whole country associated Trump with his best friends the Clintons. You are just a simple minded fool that ignores the truth.

“ Literal court cases of underage kids accusing him”. And rape?

You think many cases brought to court aren’t fabricated? How naive are you? Just because someone says it, it’s true?

People make up all the time. You’re proof of that. You’re the fool. And a very gullible fool.