New posts

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Volatility_rivals135605" data-source="post: 132060903" data-attributes="member: 1476288">Relax bro, Im not bitching about anything, just stating a logical fact.  Wv is a poor state, the mean income is one of the lowest in the country, and the number of accredited/qualified investors is also one of the lowest.  If CRT is strictly dependent on annual donations, thats not a methodology that will allow us to raise the ceiling, more so a tread water strategy. Though, its certainly better than nothing at all..Im doing my part, I always have.. Im creating a private org/bus(for me only) specifically for WVU nil. Seeding it with a healthy sum, and deploy in an intelligent manner so the annual return from that sum will allow me to source 2-3 cornerstone nil deals per year with a structure similar to what I outlined above, but perhaps slightly larger.  2024 class will be the first class I engage with this nil entity. This way if I choose to cease nil, Ill still have my initial seed/allocation, only losing out on that capital's growth potential over that period of time.  A personal sacrifice Ill gladly make, because I want WVU to succeed(I believe most of us do, while we may disagree on some topics or perspectives, Im pretty sure the majority of us here want to see WVU perform at higher levels and to do so a bit more consistently).  True, they're 2023 class isnt on campus yet, and while Satterfield may not be around to see the fruits, if the next hire is able to retain that talent, perhaps the next staff will see a positive boost in outcome.  Louisville wasnt mentioned as a reflection of Satterfield, but how they are obviously leveraging nil to boost talent acquisition. Of course that doesnt always equate to wins.... If it did Texas and Tennessee would never fall from grace, so many variables afterall, but you cant win without it(Even if its under-rated + valued gem-like talent).  I suppose it at least helps increase the probability of positive outcomes, but each individual has to weigh the choice of giving on their own.  Again, it doesnt have to be vast sums, it can be simple things, like going to games or streaming them, or buying your kid a WVU hat for his birthday.  "Value" is both subjective and relative to each individual. Judging that in any form or way is not my jam...  chEERS</blockquote>

Name

Top Bottom