Recruiting: The NCAA should be ashamed of themselves.

MetEdDawg

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
522
0
0
There needs to be an early signing period and the NCAA has continued not to implement one. They continue to let the prostitution of 17-19 year old high school football players make them and other sports entities like ESPN millions and millions of dollars and it's just flat out wrong. Situations like ours and many others schools out there happen during this time of the year simply because of no early signing period.

For our school, Mix and Jones would have been locked up months ago to the school we know they want to be at, which is MSU. Instead, the end of recruiting season comes around and bigger, richer schools start hanging around and try to poach the talent that we've worked so hard to get to our university. So the big and rich will continue to get bigger and richer because they can offer publicity and individual recognition that schools like ours can't possibly offer compared to the likes of Bama, Florida, and others.

It also keeps about half of the NCAA rules committee employed. I would hazard to guess at least half to 2/3 of all violations reported or investigated happen in the last month or two of recruiting season. Now if half of the eligible athletes were locked up to their school, there would be no need for these NCAA rules committee employees to even have a job. So they let 17-19 year old recruits, barely old enough to make important life decisions on their own, be treated like royalty for two months and allow schools to throw almost whatever they want to at a kid just to get them to campus.

It's embarrassing and the NCAA should be ashamed that they have allowed this to go on for as long as it has. Recruiting should not play this big a part in college football. It should be about the games played on the field, not the games played in back rooms and bars and campuses that mess with the minds of very impressionable teenagers. It hurts schools like us and it only empowers the bigger schools more. The NCAA and the entities its connected with have turned this part of college football into a nightmare. Instead of helping the game of football, they only hurt it by making it more high stakes, ruthless, and by teaching kids that if they are good enough, they too can be treated like royalty. This takes away from the team concept and the overall goal of college in general and it disgusts me.

Had to get this off my chest. May the meltdown continue.
 
Sep 16, 2012
498
0
0
Good post...

..but there is too much money involved to change things. And by money I don't mean bribing players. I mean big bucks made off recruiting sites & recruiting "gurus." You can add ESPN to the list. They exploit the hell out of this crap, & should be called out for it. Such is a culture that has evolved around college football since the invention of the internet, & it's rotten to the core. These scam artists are getting rich off of all the drama & uproar. If the NCAA changes the recruiting rules, then many people are going to suffer financially, which means they will be pissed & start spilling the beans. And I don't think the NCAA wants their dirty laundry aired to the public. Because when it comes to dirty laundry, the NCAA has enough to fill the Grand Canyon.
 

thf24

Redshirt
Jan 28, 2011
1,334
3
38
Exactly. Something will have to happen to the NCAA that requires it to be completely gutted and start over before anything can change.
 
Aug 18, 2009
1,107
40
48
I'm all for an early signing period, but that was one of the best Genespage

posts I've ever read. Whining that there should be an early signing period because poor little Mississippi State... Bravo!
 

HammerOfTheDogs

All-Conference
Jun 20, 2001
10,762
1,547
113
Yawn

This is the best time of their lives. Maybe the only time they actually control the situation. Besides, what happens if some 5* signs with us in September than has an RGIII-type knee blowout?

Maybe there should be an early signing day, but not because it makes a bunch of unathletic, middle-aged men feel better about themselves.
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
The other thing is that an early signing period would only shift the recruiting calendar. Coaches would treat the early period like the final period. All evaluations and offers would move up. Visits would move up.

I used to like the idea of an early period just to cut the process down and split the process up, but I don't think it would really solve much. Most players just wouldn't commit early.
 

WestDawg

Redshirt
Aug 24, 2012
117
11
18
as a high school coach, I feel that there needs to be an early signing period for football. The stresses that many of these student athletes go through, along with their families, is reaching all new highs. MANY college staffs keep a lot of kids warm stringing them along just in case option #1 or #2 dont come through and commit and sign. I think there should be at least two, but no more than three signing periods for HS football seniors. Yeah, call me crazy. I dont mind. I have been called far worse in my nights walking the sidelines. If this is truly about the kids, then let it be about the kids. The idea that these athletes "have a say" or "now have the power" are grossly exagerrated by many on the outside looking in. This process has turned into a big business....and the kids are not the ones doing running it. From coaches and admins to boosters with an ego to pet and sports analysts, reporters, recruiting site managers - this entire process is well out of hand. I have had several kids recruited by DI, DII, NAIA, and JUCO levels, and some from major teams in the power conferences. Sad to say it, but most of the big schools do this regularly, particularly from the SEC. You end up with kids who run out of options at the end because they are holding out for a scholly from a better school that kept stringing them along. and not just the Alabamas in football, but even places like MSU, Kentucky, Indiana and the like. They all do it. By opening up at least an early signing period, you can clear out a lot of kids off the table that would otherwise be stuck out at the end or at least not be strung along for as long. Yes, those top 100 or so recruits in the country would still play the game, but college coaches also would not wait around as long on filling some immediate needs and get some kids off the boards to make the picture much more clear for the ones wanting to wait until the second period. And dont for one second think that the coaches would hold off on filling slots - many would jump at the chance to clear a lot of this up as soon as they finish the summer before they get into gear in the fall. It frees them up for more time with their program internally, as well as to focus on a select smaller number of prospects for those remaining slots. I would tend to believe that most schools would fill at the least 5 spots, and for most programs, they could fill as many as 12-15 spots by the end of the summer/early fall. It might be a bit chaotic the first year, but most coaches would value this opportunity, including a guy like Saban. I truly do wish for the students that this would happen.
 

HammerOfTheDogs

All-Conference
Jun 20, 2001
10,762
1,547
113
Just think of the hot SUMMER parties these kids would be having if we had a September signing day. Also, it would put northern schools into the mix. The midwest can be beautiful in the summer, and a lot of the southern boys would be swayed by how moderate the temps are in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, etc. Right now, we don't have to worry about them stealing southern recruits because everything up there is icy, depressing, and dark (7:30 sunrises and 4:30 sunsets...I can understand why midwestern farmers sometimes ax-murder their families).
 
Last edited: