...does anybody know what the rules are related to how often a coaching staff can contact a recruit?
Regarding Marcello's blog post about our self-reported violations...
- Thread starter Bobby Ricigliano
- Start date
...does anybody know what the rules are related to how often a coaching staff can contact a recruit?
and in general how the hell can we not get the tennis and golf coaches to follow the rules? Geez. It's almost comical
Lay off Bracky. He knows what the hell he is doing. At the end of the day, most of these rules that are broken are so easy to do just on accident, that there isn't much you can do to avoid it as a compliance guy. Not to mention, EVERY program in the country has secondary violations, because they are so easy to do on accident.
pump the brakes chief.....<div>
</div><div>I wonder what Pern did with who to constitute a violation? And did it work../?/</div>
</div><div>I wonder what Pern did with who to constitute a violation? And did it work../?/</div>
<span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: 'Lucida Grande', 'Lucida Sans Unicode', Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">"A student worker in MSU’s football office posted a comment to a recruit on Twitter. The student worker received a letter of admonishment. In a letter dated Aug. 5, 2001, the SEC asked MSU to not contact the recruit for two weeks."</span>
I cannot imagine Parish Alford for the DJever blogging about any kind of Ole Miss violation. I know these are just minor infractions but to the average person it has a bad perception when every one else is not doing the same thing. Again, others may do the same but I do not recall ever seeing it.
Evah?
Not to go all black helicopter but I can't remember seeing one, though I am sure they NEVER make self-reported violations.
Not to go all black helicopter but I can't remember seeing one, though I am sure they NEVER make self-reported violations.
I see where Brad Locke files a request under the Freedom of Information Act to find out what secondary violations we have committed over the last several months. Going above and beyond to report it. Unless a newspaper requires all of its beat writers to do this, then that is total BS.
My guess is that the beat writers have more flexibility what to post about than they have about what articles to write.The fact that the UM beat writer hasn't blogged about itmightmean he's slower at blogging, still waiting on the information from UM, or lazier than Marcello. I don't see the problem with Marcello putting it on the blog, though. I think it's newsworthy, just like Veazey's blog about UM's potential secondary violation was newsworthy yesterday.