Rick Reilly NAILS why MLB sucks

Sutterkane

Redshirt
Jan 23, 2007
5,100
0
0
http://espn.go.com/espn/s...41/mlb-pace-play-problem

Things that nobody reads in America today:</p>

</p>

The online legal mumbo jumbo before you check the little "I Agree" box. </p>

</p>


Kate Upton's resume.</p>

</p>


Major League Baseball's "Pace of Play Procedures."</p>

</p>


Not that baseball games don't have a pace. They do: snails escaping a freezer.</p>

</p>


It's clear no MLB player or umpire has ever read the procedures, or else
how do you explain what I witnessed Sunday, when I sat down to do
something really stupid -- watch an entire televised MLB game without
the aid of a DVR?</p>

</p>


Cincinnati at San Francisco was a 3-hour, 14-minute
can-somebody-please-stick-two-forks-in-my-eyes snore-a-palooza. Like a
Swedish movie, it might have been decent if somebody had cut 90 minutes
out of it. I'd rather have watched eyebrows grow. And I should have known better. </p>

</p>


Consider: There were 280 pitches thrown and, after 170 of them, the
hitter got out of the batter's box and did … absolutely nothing.</p>

</p>


Mostly, hitters delayed the proceedings to kick imaginary dirt off their
cleats, meditate, and un-Velcro and re-Velcro their batting gloves,
despite the fact that most of the time, they hadn't even swung.</p>

</p>


Buster Posey of the Giants, The Man Who Wrecked Your Dinner
Reservations, has this habit of coming to the box, stopping outside it
and unfastening and refastening his gloves before his FIRST SWING! What
exactly was he doing in the on-deck circle? His cuticles?</p>

</p>


I knew I was in trouble in the first inning when the Reds' Brandon Phillips stepped up. My notes on his five-pitch at-bat:</p>

</p>


Strike: steps out, examines the trademark of his bat at length.</p>

</p>

Ball: steps out, grabs barrel of bat, seems to be talking to it.</p>

</p>

Ball: steps out, takes three practice swings, taps corner
of batter's box, steps one foot in, taps plate, places other foot in,
stretches, fiddles, finally looks at pitcher, calls timeout! Does it all
again.</p>

</p>

Swing and a miss: steps way out, adjusts belt, adjusts jersey, addresses barrel again.</p>

</p>

Grounds out to short.</p>

</p>


Apparently, the bat didn't listen.</p>

</p>


By the way, the average number of seconds per pitch this game: 31.34.
Thirty-one seconds per pitch? This is not a misprint. Do you realize
people can solve an entire Rubik's Cube in 22 seconds?</p>

</p>


All of this, of course, is in direct violation of MLB's "Pace of Play
Procedures" (hah!), which state: "Umpires will not grant time for
batters to step out of the box if to do so would unnecessarily delay the
game."</p>

</p>


Unnecessarily delay the game? The only delay these hitters knew
was unnecessary. And when they weren't doing that, the pitchers were
lollygagging behind the mound, re-rubbing pre-rubbed baseballs or gazing
up to identify cloud animals.</p>

</p>

New rule: Umpires who don't order batters back into
the box within 12 seconds -- because the rules state that a pitcher must
throw the ball within 12 seconds of receiving it -- will get the room
at the hotel next to the newlyweds
.</p>

</p>


There's also this amusing passage in the "Pace of Play Procedures"
(hah!): "When given permission to leave the batter's box under Rule
6.02, batters may not step more than 3 feet from the batter's box."</p>

</p>


Whoo-eee! That's rich. These guys wandered away from the box like
2-year-olds at a petting zoo. Six times they left the dirt circle around
the plate altogether. Left the entire circle! </p>

</p>


And by the way, this nonsense about there's only a 2-minute, 10-second
TV break between half innings? Bullfeathers. Only once did the break
between half innings take 2:10 or less. The rest of the time, it was
miles over. The break before the top of the fifth was 4 minutes, 12
seconds! Where did everybody go? Out to feed their meters?</p>

</p>


There were more ways to waste time in this game than in a month of teamsters meetings.</p>

</p>


There were 14 attempts by pitchers to pick off runners, not one of them
even coming close. Most of them resembled somebody tossing a turkey to a
co-worker.</p>

</p>


New rule: Pitchers get two pickoff attempts per runner. For every one after that, the umpire adds a ball to the hitter's count.</p>

</p>


Four times the hitter, after going through his Art Carney routine, got
into the box, decided the pitcher was messing with him, and called time
out. </p>

</p>

Twice the pitcher wanted a timeout. </p>

</p>

Five times the catcher called time out to go out to the mound to discuss, what? ObamaCare? </p>

</p>

Four times the pitching coach wanted time. That's 15
timeouts in a game that didn't even have a clock. Can you imagine if Tom
Brady could call a timeout anytime he wanted? You'd be in Foxborough
long enough to vote.</p>

</p>


And explain to me why a reliever who's been warming up in the bullpen
for five minutes still needs eight pitches to warm up on the mound. Do
field goal kickers get eight practice kicks? Dumb.</p>

</p>


Like tennis grunts, all this crud is just a lot of bad habits that only
serve to annoy the very people MLB is supposedly trying to captivate --
the fans. It doesn't sell more TV ads, doesn't get the game done before
the kids have to go to bed, doesn't do anything but make your thumb hit
the CHNL UP button sooner.</p>

</p>


This game was mercifully won by the Giants, 4-3, on their last at-bat,
when Reds right fielder Jay Bruce botched an easy fly ball. </p>

</p>


Three hours and 14 minutes, 170 step-outs, and three double-shot macchiatos for that?</p>

Please, I beg of you, bring on the NFL.

</p>
 

Sutterkane

Redshirt
Jan 23, 2007
5,100
0
0
http://espn.go.com/espn/s...41/mlb-pace-play-problem

Things that nobody reads in America today:</p>

</p>

The online legal mumbo jumbo before you check the little "I Agree" box. </p>

</p>


Kate Upton's resume.</p>

</p>


Major League Baseball's "Pace of Play Procedures."</p>

</p>


Not that baseball games don't have a pace. They do: snails escaping a freezer.</p>

</p>


It's clear no MLB player or umpire has ever read the procedures, or else
how do you explain what I witnessed Sunday, when I sat down to do
something really stupid -- watch an entire televised MLB game without
the aid of a DVR?</p>

</p>


Cincinnati at San Francisco was a 3-hour, 14-minute
can-somebody-please-stick-two-forks-in-my-eyes snore-a-palooza. Like a
Swedish movie, it might have been decent if somebody had cut 90 minutes
out of it. I'd rather have watched eyebrows grow. And I should have known better. </p>

</p>


Consider: There were 280 pitches thrown and, after 170 of them, the
hitter got out of the batter's box and did … absolutely nothing.</p>

</p>


Mostly, hitters delayed the proceedings to kick imaginary dirt off their
cleats, meditate, and un-Velcro and re-Velcro their batting gloves,
despite the fact that most of the time, they hadn't even swung.</p>

</p>


Buster Posey of the Giants, The Man Who Wrecked Your Dinner
Reservations, has this habit of coming to the box, stopping outside it
and unfastening and refastening his gloves before his FIRST SWING! What
exactly was he doing in the on-deck circle? His cuticles?</p>

</p>


I knew I was in trouble in the first inning when the Reds' Brandon Phillips stepped up. My notes on his five-pitch at-bat:</p>

</p>


Strike: steps out, examines the trademark of his bat at length.</p>

</p>

Ball: steps out, grabs barrel of bat, seems to be talking to it.</p>

</p>

Ball: steps out, takes three practice swings, taps corner
of batter's box, steps one foot in, taps plate, places other foot in,
stretches, fiddles, finally looks at pitcher, calls timeout! Does it all
again.</p>

</p>

Swing and a miss: steps way out, adjusts belt, adjusts jersey, addresses barrel again.</p>

</p>

Grounds out to short.</p>

</p>


Apparently, the bat didn't listen.</p>

</p>


By the way, the average number of seconds per pitch this game: 31.34.
Thirty-one seconds per pitch? This is not a misprint. Do you realize
people can solve an entire Rubik's Cube in 22 seconds?</p>

</p>


All of this, of course, is in direct violation of MLB's "Pace of Play
Procedures" (hah!), which state: "Umpires will not grant time for
batters to step out of the box if to do so would unnecessarily delay the
game."</p>

</p>


Unnecessarily delay the game? The only delay these hitters knew
was unnecessary. And when they weren't doing that, the pitchers were
lollygagging behind the mound, re-rubbing pre-rubbed baseballs or gazing
up to identify cloud animals.</p>

</p>

New rule: Umpires who don't order batters back into
the box within 12 seconds -- because the rules state that a pitcher must
throw the ball within 12 seconds of receiving it -- will get the room
at the hotel next to the newlyweds
.</p>

</p>


There's also this amusing passage in the "Pace of Play Procedures"
(hah!): "When given permission to leave the batter's box under Rule
6.02, batters may not step more than 3 feet from the batter's box."</p>

</p>


Whoo-eee! That's rich. These guys wandered away from the box like
2-year-olds at a petting zoo. Six times they left the dirt circle around
the plate altogether. Left the entire circle! </p>

</p>


And by the way, this nonsense about there's only a 2-minute, 10-second
TV break between half innings? Bullfeathers. Only once did the break
between half innings take 2:10 or less. The rest of the time, it was
miles over. The break before the top of the fifth was 4 minutes, 12
seconds! Where did everybody go? Out to feed their meters?</p>

</p>


There were more ways to waste time in this game than in a month of teamsters meetings.</p>

</p>


There were 14 attempts by pitchers to pick off runners, not one of them
even coming close. Most of them resembled somebody tossing a turkey to a
co-worker.</p>

</p>


New rule: Pitchers get two pickoff attempts per runner. For every one after that, the umpire adds a ball to the hitter's count.</p>

</p>


Four times the hitter, after going through his Art Carney routine, got
into the box, decided the pitcher was messing with him, and called time
out. </p>

</p>

Twice the pitcher wanted a timeout. </p>

</p>

Five times the catcher called time out to go out to the mound to discuss, what? ObamaCare? </p>

</p>

Four times the pitching coach wanted time. That's 15
timeouts in a game that didn't even have a clock. Can you imagine if Tom
Brady could call a timeout anytime he wanted? You'd be in Foxborough
long enough to vote.</p>

</p>


And explain to me why a reliever who's been warming up in the bullpen
for five minutes still needs eight pitches to warm up on the mound. Do
field goal kickers get eight practice kicks? Dumb.</p>

</p>


Like tennis grunts, all this crud is just a lot of bad habits that only
serve to annoy the very people MLB is supposedly trying to captivate --
the fans. It doesn't sell more TV ads, doesn't get the game done before
the kids have to go to bed, doesn't do anything but make your thumb hit
the CHNL UP button sooner.</p>

</p>


This game was mercifully won by the Giants, 4-3, on their last at-bat,
when Reds right fielder Jay Bruce botched an easy fly ball. </p>

</p>


Three hours and 14 minutes, 170 step-outs, and three double-shot macchiatos for that?</p>

Please, I beg of you, bring on the NFL.

</p>
 

dawgs.sixpack

Redshirt
Oct 22, 2010
1,395
0
0
why not just don't watch it if you don't like it? only 2 pickoffs per runner? that's the most ludicrous idea ever and just handing SBs out to the runner if they know they can get a huge lead and early jump. prince fielder would be a 30 SB threat.
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
0
This article hasn't been written a million times before.

I don't understand. If you don't like baseball, then why watch it? Instead you get these enlightening articles every season about people bitching about how slow it is. They want the game to change for them, so it will be "better." I have an idea; If you don't like it, don't watch it.

I don't like NASCAR, but I'm not suggesting they add something stupid to make it more enjoyable to me.
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
0
to like him way back when he wrote for SI, but then he got involved with ESPN. They gave him this TV personality, like they do with everyone, and he turned into a joke.
 

QuaoarsKing

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2008
5,788
2,380
113
If you don't like a particular sport, don't like it. And certainly don't suggest rule changes that would piss off people who do like it (and still wouldn't make you like it)
 

RonnyAtmosphere

Redshirt
Jun 4, 2007
2,883
0
0
...wow. Nobody has ever address this issue before.


I'm glad Rick Reilly is so willing to risk his career on writing such a controversial article.


It's not like the typical American is aware the game of baseball is contructed around 5% exciting events taking place within a series of 95% boring events.


I'm glad he enlightened us.


As far as new rules, I would like to see the rule that if you foul off 4 consecutive pitches, you are out. Being forced to watch a batter "spoil pitches" for 8 minutes straight is ridiculous.
 

SchruteDog

Redshirt
Jan 29, 2011
440
0
0
Game to game, sure football and even basketball are more exciting. But each one, when televised can be more annoying than the next.<div>
</div><div>At least each baseball half inning seems to have a flow to it on television.</div><div>
</div><div>Compare that to the NFL. Kickoff-commercial- 3 downs and out, punt - commercial rinse repeat over and over again.</div><div>
</div><div>Or even worse, college basketball. TV timeouts at the under 16, 12, 8, and 4 minute marks ONLY after a dead ball. So, if a team calls 4 timeouts at the 15:59 mark, guess what, they are going to take a commercial break as soon as the next dead ball happens AFTER all those commercials during the called timeouts. Even worse is if there is a dead ball at the 12:01 mark, they take the TV timeout for the under 16. Play resumes on the court, there is a foul at the 11:58 mark, and here we go again, straight to commercial. I love college basketball, but ****, March Madness seems like an infomercial because CBS runs so many damn commercials. I don't see how Renardo couldn't stay in basketball shape. All you have to do is play 3 of 4 minutes and the game is going to be stopped for a damn commercial.</div>
 

woozman

All-Conference
Nov 13, 2004
3,383
2,556
113
we live in "an instant" world now with the internet, smartphones, etc. Baseball was well suited to Americans when life was slow and lazy. Now that life is much more fast paced, a slow paced sport like baseball just doesn't fit with most people's lifestyle, which is why it is losing popularity over the years.

Having said that, it is still pretty fun if you actually go to a ballpark (kinda like hockey - enough said). I can't watch games on TV anymore, though.20 years ago, I never missed a Cubs game. I bet I haven't watched a pro game period in a decade. Baseball is a dying sport and it will never be the most popular sport in this country again...
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
0
are much more lazy now. That is why the need for this "instant gratification," if you will. They are gimme gimme gimme, want want want. They cannot accept things for what they are. Riley is just pandering to the lazy, dubmass Americans with this article.
 
May 2, 2006
171
0
0
uncreative, lazy, phoning-it-in sportswriter these days who give other uncreative, lazy phoning-it-in writers bad names.

That guy has been a bad cartoon character for years now. If you liked this article so much, wait about four years and he'll reprint it.
 

HumpDawg

Redshirt
Sep 2, 2006
80
0
0
The proposed rule that you can only throw over twice is stupid but you all are missing his main point. All the timeouts and leaving the batters box for no reason is ******** and one reason I no longer watch. Go back and watch clips from the 70s and 80s. They used to throw pitch after pitch without all the nonsense in between. Speed up the game by eliminating the unnecessary stoppage and more people will watch.
 

DerHntr

All-Conference
Sep 18, 2007
15,762
2,569
113
it is a shame that they don't enforce their own rules already on the books. Those new rules he suggests are dumb and unnecessary if they just follow through with current ones.
 

AceLeroy

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
284
0
0
Notch Johnson dawg said:
uncreative, lazy, phoning-it-in sportswriter these days who give other uncreative, lazy phoning-it-in writers bad names.

That guy has been a bad cartoon character for years now. If you liked this article so much, wait about four years and he'll reprint it.
He proved himself an idiot to me when He said He'd punch any man in the face who claimed John Wooden knew about Sam Gilbert.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,757
5,547
113
KurtRambis4 said:
This article hasn't been written a million times before.

I don't understand. If you don't like baseball, then why watch it? Instead you get these enlightening articles every season about people bitching about how slow it is. They want the game to change for them, so it will be "better." I have an idea; If you don't like it, don't watch it.

I don't like NASCAR, but I'm not suggesting they add something stupid to make it more enjoyable to me.


I really don't remember a million previous articles written about the absurdly slow pace of baseball while citing rules of the game that are being ignored.

He isn't saying he doesn't like baseball as you suggest he said, you misinterpreted the article.
He is saying its beyond the point of stupidly slow and that if the rules of the game were actually followed, it would solve the 1 universal complaint of people who don't like watching baseball.

He is pointing out how rules aren't being followed. Why is that bad? And how does that equate to him hating baseball?

It's the same **** with the NBA and its the reason why I like hearing Van Gundy when I do watch NBA games- the rules aren't followed and he is quite happy to point the absurdities out.

Why shouldn't the rules of a game be followed?

More articles should be written about this- it will highlight what is probably the most annoying thing in all of sports- when rules aren't followed and an advantage is then given to one team or player.

If the rules aren't followed, then why have them? And why not allow 4 strikes to certain batters in certain situations? I mean, the rules don't need to be followed, right?

Your entire post rants about if people don't like it, then they shouldn't watch it. That wasn't even the damn important point of the article.
 

LiterallyPolice

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2011
376
0
0
He makes some good points. Not all, but some. The game is great, but it can still be improved.

And to use all of your logic against you: If you don't like his articles, then don't read them. (I don't agree with this logic... But if you do, then you shouldn't be commenting on the article)
 

bulldogballa

Redshirt
Oct 18, 2009
29
0
0
http://online.wsj.com/art...4575002852055561406.html

That's an interesting article...while we are on the subject, and I love football and haven't missed a home game or bowl game in years for my Bulldogs do people realize how much time is wasted in a football game time slot? There is only actually about 12-15 minutes of "action" in a football game...which takes at least 3 hours
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,123
19,641
113
Every sport in one way or another has something that makes it slow paced. Everyone in the south is so nuts about football that it just gets overlooked.
 
Jun 15, 2011
3
0
0
 

dawgs.sixpack

Redshirt
Oct 22, 2010
1,395
0
0
um, because it would just be a series of runners getting big leads and either drawing 2 pick off throws then stealing or if the pitcher tries to use "strategy" and not waste both pick off throws, then the runner would easily steal the base because of his big lead.
 

dawgs.sixpack

Redshirt
Oct 22, 2010
1,395
0
0
bulldogballa said:
http://online.wsj.com/art...4575002852055561406.html

That's an interesting article...while we are on the subject, and I love football and haven't missed a home game or bowl game in years for my Bulldogs do people realize how much time is wasted in a football game time slot? There is only actually about 12-15 minutes of "action" in a football game...which takes at least 3 hours
yep. the national title game and the super bowl are some of my least favorite games of the year as a non-fan of the teams involved too because of the increased number of commercial breaks takes away from any flow to the game.<div>
</div><div>same thing with the poster that brought up all the commercials in basketball. there are so many "breaks" in the action that it ruins basketball imo. as soon as the players get in a flow after a couple of possessions we get another tv timeout. or a back to back coaches timeout and tv timeout.
</div>
 

BulldogBlitz

Heisman
Dec 11, 2008
15,794
19,015
113
...that don't like baseball. this lull in the year has got to suck.

on the same note, is there a form of baseball that doesn't suck so much? MLB, college, HS, tee ball, softball league of beer drinkers?

for those that suggest watching something else... yes, i do. just wondering if there's actually a difference.
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
0
theme of the article is that baseball is too slow because of bs going on. There have been numerous articles written with this as the main theme. Go to Google and type in "baseball is too slow," and see what you get.If he doesn't dislike the current state of a game, then why write this? He obviously does not enjoy games, from this article.I realize you love Riley, but he is a hack. He oncewas good, but is no longer. I'm sorry, pops, if I hurt your feelings, talking bad about your favoriteESPN "personality."

To the one(s) saying "why do you read his articles if you dislike them?" I don't. Someone linked it here and I saw it. I did not search the Internet for it.
 

saltslugs

Redshirt
Oct 9, 2009
1,500
0
0
The runner would steal need to play it safe unless there had been two pickoffs (at which case, a pickoff could steal occur but would count as a ball--same as a pitch out). There's no reason to think that players would just be running wild. There would be more stolen bases, moresuccessfulpickoffs (as players would be more risky since anunsuccessfulpickoff is beneficial), and shorter games. Win... win... win.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,757
5,547
113
I loathe the guy. I dont read his articles, they are usually pretty worthless. The few i have read in the last 5 years havent made me feel like it was worth it after reading.
Im not sure why you would assume i love the guy just because i was able to point out he makes good points that are backed up by, you know, the rules of the game.

And when did being 31 make me a 'pops'? Or was that just a genericmessage board slam that you decided to toss in since you were on such a roll?
 

Rebels7

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
1,389
0
0
But MLB is significantly different than other forms of the sport. One of the points I believe he is trying to make is that MLB is in love with itself and they love to just sit in the glory that is "Major League Baseball."

College baseball players don't bask in their awesomeness the way Alex Rodriguez does between every pitch. High School and Connie Mack players don't wait twenty minutes between each pitch to toe the rubber. They play the game.

Like someone said above, it is an article that has been written a million times, but it doesn't make it less true. I'd rather watch a MLS soccer game than a MLB game on TV. The reason being is that they all seem to enjoy standing around telling each other how great they are.
 

dawgs.sixpack

Redshirt
Oct 22, 2010
1,395
0
0
saltslugs said:
The runner would steal need to play it safe unless there had been two pickoffs (at which case, a pickoff could steal occur but would count as a ball--same as a pitch out). There's no reason to think that players would just be running wild. There would be more stolen bases, moresuccessfulpickoffs (as players would be more risky since anunsuccessfulpickoff is beneficial), and shorter games. Win... win... win.
1) if you get a big enough lead you know the pitcher will throw over. knowing that you are merely getting a big lead just to dive back on first movement means you can get pretty far off the bag. <div>
</div><div>2) i seriously doubt you'd have pitcher's throwing over much and giving away balls. </div><div>
</div><div>3) it's just a dumb idea. keep guys in the box or make pitchers use less time between pitches, but this idea is dumb. i also think it's dumb to ***** about a hitter calling time to step out of the box when the pitcher takes too long. standing in your stance ready to hit for 10+ seconds not really blinking and what not, if the pitcher can't figure out what pitch he wants, then the hitter should be able to call a quick timeout and step back for a second.</div>