So you have no good answer to my point, got it.Yawn.
Do you ever tire of being so derivative?
You've never had anything close to an original thought.
Do you ever tire of being on the wrong side of a conversation?
So you have no good answer to my point, got it.Yawn.
Do you ever tire of being so derivative?
You've never had anything close to an original thought.
I said predominantly and the majority of Congress is older white men. It doesn’t mean they are the only members but they greatly outnumber others.
I said Congress who is making the laws. SCOTUS interprets the laws. There is a difference.
The point is Ed’s comment was correct though. Congress both federal and state level are made up predominantly of older white men. What they want beats whatever the others want. Sports gambling in KY is a perfect example.Then argue the laws
How much of the left's platform is actually popular before conditioning the populace? The left doesn't give a **** about what the population wants. They tell you what to want and how to think.the point is that these laws are being made by predominantly older white men. Many times without considering the input of their constituents. We’ve seen that happen in KY where congress won’t vote on sports gambling when the vast majority of Kentuckians want it.
The point is Ed’s comment was correct though. Congress both federal and state level are made up predominantly of older white men. What they want beats whatever the others want. Sports gambling in KY is a perfect example.
No one said they should have the majority control. But lawmakers should listen to the constituents and a lot of the time they don’t. Sports gambling in KY is a prime example.Hmm, last I checked white people make up the majority of this country. When can we stop pretending minorities should have majority control?
FWIW, the tipping point on this SCOTUS 'decision' is most likely a female.It’s a cop out, and yes it’s racist. Ones color does not make them automatically right or wrong. Plus this decision is not being made by just old white men, so it’s inaccurate to begin with.
It was sent back to the states to make the laws which will be done by Congress who again is primarily older white men.We will agree to disagree, seems it was overturned by a Supreme Court that has equal female representation. Hopefully now that’s settled you can argue your point and not make this a racial or sexist divisive conversation. Good luck!
Haha, you lefties just can’t see anything past race. It’s all by design because you’re ideas and policies are unbelievably bad. So it’s “hey, vote for me because I’m a black woman, or Hispanic male”. Not because I’ll fix **** and make your life better. You need to distract from actual issues to have a chance.The point is Ed’s comment was correct though. Congress both federal and state level are made up predominantly of older white men. What they want beats whatever the others want. Sports gambling in KY is a perfect example.
That's politics because politicians are mere mascots to the public when in reality, those politicians are puppets for lobbyists, mega corps, foreign nations, special interest groups, etc. They do not give a crap about the voters. They do the little song and dance for votes every few years and then vote how their masters tell them. The people who actually run things are not the ones in office.The point is Ed’s comment was correct though. Congress both federal and state level are made up predominantly of older white men. What they want beats whatever the others want. Sports gambling in KY is a perfect example.
Nothing you just said makes what Ed said any less true. You can say focus on race too much and maybe you are right but that doesn’t change the fact that laws in this country are made by primarily older white men without listening to what the people that voted for them actually want.Haha, you lefties just can’t see anything past race. It’s all by design because you’re ideas and policies are unbelievably bad. So it’s “hey, vote for me because I’m a black woman, or Hispanic male”. Not because I’ll fix **** and make your life better. You need to distract from actual issues to have a chance.
No one said they should have the majority control. But lawmakers should listen to the constituents and a lot of the time they don’t. Sports gambling in KY is a prime example.
Yup. You can't stop abortion. You can only stop legal abortions. There is no difference in abortion rates in countries where it is legal vs. countries where it is restricted/not legal. What outlawing abortion does do is cause worse health outcomes for pregnant women and children.This will go about as well as prohibition of alcohol, guns and drugs. The procedure will still occur. The only difference is it’ll be done underground on the black market instead of in a medical facility.
I don’t disagree that others don’t listen to their constituents when they should but again, lawmakers are primarily made up of older white men who by sheer numbers get what they want in laws regardless of what their constituents or the objections by their fellow lawmakers.Ok and that’s true in a million difference ways that are no race related. There are black lawmakers that don’t follow all of the wants of their constituents as well. Every single lawmaker does this and in a lot of cases has to do it.
Why is it a race thing again? Most whites people want gambling as well…
Well, Curtis, this country was 80-85% white just 40 years ago so that's not surprising. "OMG! I can't believe England is so white!"It was sent back to the states to make the laws which will be done by Congress who again is primarily older white men.
Nothing you just said makes what Ed said any less true. You can say focus on race too much and maybe you are right but that doesn’t change the fact that laws in this country are made by primarily older white men without listening to what the people that voted for them actually want.
Coming from you this is rich. However, you still did not address the point. Why? Because even you can see how ridiculous your party and people have become. You can't just pick and choose when you are a woman or not depending on the situation.You're conflating not answering one stupid gotcha question with not being able to actually define gender, sex, etc.
It's impossible to have an honest, intelligent conversation with people like Warriorcat because they resort to the most asinine talking points every time.
But by all means. Keep complaining about ***** hats and a swimmer who came in 5th place.
Would you agree that people that are older have more life experience? Perhaps there's wisdom there, and it's that young people are to naive to realize that.Ok just for you I’ll change it to all old men. Feel better now?
It was sent back to the states to make the laws which will be done by Congress who again is primarily older white men.
I don’t disagree that others don’t listen to their constituents when they should but again, lawmakers are primarily made up of older white men who by sheer numbers get what they want in laws regardless of what their constituents or the objections by their fellow lawmakers.
None of that insane drivel has anything to do with the topic at hand. Nice try though. Whether they vote the way I want or not is pointless. Lawmakers need to listen and vote the way their constituents want them to. In some cases, that would be for outlawing abortion. In some cases that would be pro abortion. But the majority of lawmakers don’t vote that way. They vote based on their own beliefs and that’s simply wrong. I don’t care if you are Republican or democrat. You are their to represent the people. Not vote for what you want.Well, Curtis, this country was 80-85% white just 40 years ago so that's not surprising. "OMG! I can't believe England is so white!"
Whose fault is it that the "party of diversity" still convinces all of you to vote for whites? The guy you voted for in the 2020 election is old and white and served in Congress with multiple members that were born in the 1800s. That's how old he is. You don't seem to mind when they vote the way you want them to.
You can’t even get your joke right. I said older not old.New drinking game! Every time this guy says “old white men”, take a shot!
We’d all be dead…racist
Agreed, while the scenarios are not the same the end result would be, taking another life that should be protected.I'm not going to get into an argument about if abortion is murder, but in this example you'd face charges in Oklahoma, because that's where the crime was committed, not in Texas. In the abortion example you would face charges in Texas. Those two scenarios are not the same.
If this leak is true they aren't banning abortions, theyre simply putting it back to where it should've been decided, in legislatures. Thats how Democracy works, where the people decide. The people don't have a say in Supreme Court Justices.This will go about as well as prohibition of alcohol, guns and drugs. The procedure will still occur. The only difference is it’ll be done underground on the black market instead of in a medical facility.
I think I should have the legal right to kill too.The timing of this couldn't be worse for Republicans. The Republican Party is set up to win big in the elections this year and if this report is true it is going to change the vote. As a Republican I also can't support this. I believe in Pro-Life but at the same time firmly believe Women must have the legal option to make their own decision. And the percentages show most Republicans fall into this category as well. I can somewhat stomach each State being allowed to have their own Abortion Laws because that still provides locations where Women if they so choose can have a legal Abortion.
In addition how does something like this get leaked? No matter which Justice leaked this information they must be removed from the Supreme Court.
But how else will you know they're an ally in their gated community and white neighborhoods unless they too complain about old whites to pander to blacks who they infantilize?New drinking game! Every time this guy says “old white men”, take a shot!
We’d all be dead…racist
If this leak is true they aren't banning abortions, theyre simply putting it back to where it should've been decided, in legislatures. Thats how Democracy works, where the people decide. The people don't have a say in Supreme Court Justices.
Would you agree sometimes they can’t relate to the world they live in now? They get more stubborn with age and more set in their way and less willing to consider others opinions.Would you agree that people that are older have more life experience? Perhaps there's wisdom there, and it's that young people are to naive to realize that.
Show us in the constitution where it says abortion is legal even up to birth then tell us about the 2nd amendment and how that is banned in certain cities and states....Nothing stopping them from declaring that unconstitutional.
One abortion and it’s time to have reproductive organs removed.
Sure, when we boot Clarence Thomas for voting in his own personal interest to keep his wife's insurrectionist cell phone records secret.The timing of this couldn't be worse for Republicans. The Republican Party is set up to win big in the elections this year and if this report is true it is going to change the vote. As a Republican I also can't support this. I believe in Pro-Life but at the same time firmly believe Women must have the legal option to make their own decision. And the percentages show most Republicans fall into this category as well. I can somewhat stomach each State being allowed to have their own Abortion Laws because that still provides locations where Women if they so choose can have a legal Abortion.
In addition how does something like this get leaked? No matter which Justice leaked this information they must be removed from the Supreme Court.
Absolutely and especiallyDoes that include the man who made the baby but didn’t elect to stick around and support his child physically, emotionally and financially?