Roe vs. Wade Overturned.
- Thread starter mrhotdice
- Start date
- Status
Why not tell the guys to keep it in their pants? They are just as responsible but basically get to walk away scott free. What about rape victims who were forced to spread their legs? They are having a choice made for them twice.
If a parents has a child, that child can fall under their benefits. If they have a fetus whose life began at birth, that fetus won't qualify for benefits until it is born.
If a father divorces the mother, he has to pay child support (or in the rare case the mother has to). If a father leaves, or is never with, the mother after she is impregnated, he doesn't have to pay anything.
So then does life begin at conception or birth? Your laws contradict this whole life begins at conception concept.
But let me guess, you don't support any of that, because you want to punish the women while letting the men get off scott free.
If a father divorces the mother, he has to pay child support (or in the rare case the mother has to). If a father leaves, or is never with, the mother after she is impregnated, he doesn't have to pay anything.
So then does life begin at conception or birth? Your laws contradict this whole life begins at conception concept.
But let me guess, you don't support any of that, because you want to punish the women while letting the men get off scott free.
The Texas law does exactly that boomer in regards to supporting rapist over mother.
We don’t make laws on the .01% of cases. Which is what rape cases that results in pregnancy are.
also I previously stated men who are proven to be the father should be held accountable as well. One child that come from your nit sack that is a welfare child and snippy snip
Let Dave Chappelle handle this debate:
"If you can kill this motha ******.. I can at least abandon him!"
"If you can kill this motha ******.. I can at least abandon him!"
Dude….. just stop with the intellectually dishonest posturing.
Take a deep breath and let the SCOTUS render its official decision.
But those rapes happen and they need to be accounted for in the laws.
snippy snip if you can find the guy. You think police will spend any effort looking for him if he has taken off? Also, do you really think any of these laws will address the guy involved? We all know it will be woman only that is addressed.
Last edited:
How interesting that just a weeks ago they refused to define a 'woman,'and now today the only thing they want to talk about is protecting a 'woman's right to choose.
You can't make this **** up.
You can't make this **** up.
Yeah I knew what you meant, just wanted to clarify because there is another "church" named after Satan that some religious conservatives confuse with the Satanic Temple and dismiss everything as like a "crazy Satanic people love to butcher babies" type of thing.
I would think this would not be opposed by anybody on the right.
The opposition would come from elsewhere because abortion on demand is a natural outgrowth of the desire to have no consequences- from sex, from loans, from breaking the law.
This but I'm also enjoying the hysterical meltdown.
Only 31% of Republicans support abortion bans. 54% think it should be legal under certain circumstances and 15% thing it should be legal under any circumstance.
Since you’re obviously quite the biblical scholar I’m sure you can quote the book chapter and verse of this restriction. I’ve honestly never this before.
You shall keep my statutes. You shall not let your cattle breed with a different kind. You shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed, nor shall you wear a garment of cloth made of two kinds of material. - Leviticus 19:19
It is referenced in many other verses as well.
Thank you. I worship Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, who came to fulfill the law. Therefore I don’t follow the minutiae of Jewish law.
It’s still an example of people picking and choosing what parts of the Bible to follow. It’s things like this that turn people away from religion. Hypochristians are a huge problem.
That is one odd puzzle you’re putting together there bud. Again, you’re standing on the rape victims to push your narrative. Have you asked these victims if they want to represent your noble cause. Do you think these victims appreciate you speaking for them?
Idgaf when it happens it's still murder.
The liberal meltdown defines their hearts and souls perfectly.
Christians aren’t perfect.
Jesus basically gave us two commandments:
1. Love God with our whole heart, mind, soul, and strength.
2. Love our neighbor as ourselves.
Jesus didn’t command his believers to follow the Old Testament strictures, so I don’t follow them. Nothing hypocritical about that.
A lot of people became biologists all of a sudden. This was all coordinated of course, destroying norms to in turn destroy another norm of the 50 vote threshold in the senate. And bc a mid term is coming up so they needed to whip some insurrectionists up the media will cheer on putting justices lives in danger. Throw in "fascist" as much as possible.
What ppl don't understand is your feelings are irrelevant. The job of the scotus isn't to judge if a law is good or bad it's only to apply it to the constitution. This isn't hard. But this is where we are when ppl have repeatedly wanted activists on the bench.
The slippery slope about ending gay marriage and what not is complete nonsense too. The opinions specifically say to not mess with obergefell. But ppl would actually have to read to see that.
SCOTUS has hardly any old white men. In fact off top of my head I can't think of one now that breyer is gone.
This would be decided by states. As it should be, and not likely that it would turn out that way. You’re hysterical and not in the funny way.
Clerks and staff who were responsible for this leak should be severely disciplined, including permanent disbarment where appropriate.
If a SCOTUS justice is shown to be involved in disseminating the leak, then impeachment is fully justified.
What does this have to do with whether the Constitution guarantees it as a right?
When it comes to Washington and the deep state nothing ever is at it seems or they want you to believe. I think this is being considered and leaked right before the mid-terms to galvanize Dems voting so the Republicans winning back Congress & Senate doesn't happen as everyone has been predicting. Then when the Presidential Election rolls around they will lay the groundwork of this was all in place and being considered because of Trump and his Supreme Court nominations. Just watch
Wow you're mad.
You guys really love murdering babies, don't ya.
It's a HOLY SACRAMENT to the left.
So you agree they need to have an exception for rape. However my point was that police will not try to find Bob who had sex with Sue and then disappeared when Sue got pregnant. The law won’t address those situations. You are fooling yourself if you think they will.
The pro-abortionists realize this is all RGB's fault, right? Right?
Deuteronomy 22:11, link below with how it's phrased in dozens of different translations
Whoever leaked should have the book thrown at them. No doubt about it. This ain't the NBA draft.
It's pretty hypocritical to say God's word doesn't matter in one case but not in another.
10 states have passed abortion laws without exceptions for rape, including Kentucky. 9 got blocked by the courts, for now. Though whenever Roe gets overturned, won't be anything stopping these states from banning abortion even in the case of rape. Texas is still on the books. They'll keep trying until the courts stop blocking it.
Last edited:
- Status