RU football makes top 25 by end of 2024?

yessir321

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2018
3,313
2,229
0
bingo.

we have 1/2 of a top 25 team.
which to be honest represents about 75 schools in America right now. The key is whether or not the offense can get going.

This will be year 2 of Kirk C year 5 of schiano coming up. Full roster turnover. We've gotta see more from the offense next year, Gavin will be an upperclassman so the "Young QB" excuse is thrown out, next year is go time for the offense. It has to be
 

JerseyNoles

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2021
2,844
2,425
3
If we can get solid QB play and open up the offense, no doubt
The D is legit
We have some dudes over there
Hopefully the O will take significant strides
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbee3

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
If that is our OOC schedule for 2024 ?….no offense sir but those teams are not pushovers. Now , I believe we can win them all and also can get to the 8-9-10 win level that would take all things coming together including QB play and receivers who can catch a ball. Not sure we should be thinking that upsets are not possible.
 

RUforlife

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2002
3,444
4,217
0
The schedule next year will be as tough, if not tougher, than this year. After the first two games which are equivalent to Wagner and Temple this year, you have a VTech squad that improved throughout the year on the road. Nebraska will be improved on the road. Illinois is better than Indiana. We have had problems with Wisconsin and Maryland. MSU likely will not be in such a mess and I am sorry, anyone on this board who thinks we are beating USC, UCLA, and Washington I think you are in for a very rude awakening. Add in the fact that Wimsatt will likely be the starting QB, even with a good defense, a repeat of 6 wins would be an accomplishment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUScrew85

AreYouNUTS

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
120,415
53,190
113
  • Like
Reactions: SBP

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,068
18,426
113
The schedule next year will be as tough, if not tougher, than this year. After the first two games which are equivalent to Wagner and Temple this year, you have a VTech squad that improved throughout the year on the road. Nebraska will be improved on the road. Illinois is better than Indiana. We have had problems with Wisconsin and Maryland. MSU likely will not be in such a mess and I am sorry, anyone on this board who thinks we are beating USC, UCLA, and Washington I think you are in for a very rude awakening. Add in the fact that Wimsatt will likely be the starting QB, even with a good defense, a repeat of 6 wins would be an accomplishment.
As tough, if not tougher?

Michigan #1
OSU #7
PSU #10
Iowa #20

UW #2
USC unranked
UCLA unranked

Saying it won't be easy I can see. And things can change.

Tougher? No way.
 

RUforlife

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2002
3,444
4,217
0
As tough, if not tougher?

Michigan #1
OSU #7
PSU #10
Iowa #20

UW #2
USC unranked
UCLA unranked

Saying it won't be easy I can see. And things can change.

Tougher? No way.
Tougher because as a collective the 10 games playing real competition will be harder to find 4 wins next year. Playing NU the first game of this year was a gift from God and VTech at the end of the year was playing much better football than when we played them. Will MSU gift us another game by imploding on special teams in the 4th quarter? Penn State was over ranked, that is a flawed offensive team and USC and UCLA have the resources to take a big step forward. Schiano should get a lot of credit for 6 wins next year, much more than this year.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,068
18,426
113
Tougher because as a collective the 10 games playing real competition will be harder to find 4 wins next year. Playing NU the first game of this year was a gift from God and VTech at the end of the year was playing much better football than when we played them. Will MSU gift us another game by imploding on special teams in the 4th quarter? Penn State was over ranked, that is a flawed offensive team and USC and UCLA have the resources to take a big step forward. Schiano should get a lot of credit for 6 wins next year, much more than this year.

Yet you exclude the possibility of Rutgers improving and assume it with USC and UCLA. However, all signs point to the RU defense indeed being improved and the possibility exists with the O.
 

RUschool

Heisman
Jan 23, 2004
49,910
14,001
78
Tougher because as a collective the 10 games playing real competition will be harder to find 4 wins next year. Playing NU the first game of this year was a gift from God and VTech at the end of the year was playing much better football than when we played them. Will MSU gift us another game by imploding on special teams in the 4th quarter? Penn State was over ranked, that is a flawed offensive team and USC and UCLA have the resources to take a big step forward. Schiano should get a lot of credit for 6 wins next year, much more than this year.
MSU is now Oregon State, ranked #21, with their coach and QB. We haven’t beaten Wisconsin or Nebraska yet and they both have much better Qb. Maryland beat us the last 3 games by large margins. I don’t think we beat Wash, USC, or UCLA. There’s 5 games if we win what left. I think we will be in the range of 4-7 wins but most likely 5 wins.

All these teams are mainly passing teams.
 

RUbacker

Heisman
Dec 5, 2014
15,508
21,444
108
Barring major injuries. I think there is a chance.
Schedule, player development, 8-10 wins. Tulane, James Madison, Liberty, SMU are on that list now.
You cant make that call yet because our DL is not in place and our O is still being rebuilt. We need several pieces on O and they are yet to be determined . Having said that I am confident we can be top 25 because I have that much faith in our defense and coaches . I thought we had a chance to be ranked this year but we had to beat Iowa and Wisconsin and that did not happen plus we lost to Maryland .
 

LotusAggressor_rivals

All-American
Oct 11, 2003
15,240
6,984
113
The schedule next year will be as tough, if not tougher, than this year. After the first two games which are equivalent to Wagner and Temple this year, you have a VTech squad that improved throughout the year on the road. Nebraska will be improved on the road. Illinois is better than Indiana. We have had problems with Wisconsin and Maryland. MSU likely will not be in such a mess and I am sorry, anyone on this board who thinks we are beating USC, UCLA, and Washington I think you are in for a very rude awakening. Add in the fact that Wimsatt will likely be the starting QB, even with a good defense, a repeat of 6 wins would be an accomplishment.
It would take a miracle to beat any of these teams without throwing the ball effectively, unless the Dallas Cowboys OL from the early to mid '90s arrives through a time travel portal with eligibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheap Sunglasses

AreYouNUTS

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
120,415
53,190
113
Some of you crack me the **** up....EVERYONE else will automatically be better - REGARDLESS of roster losses - but we won't improve.

What a way to go through life ALWAYS being negative/pessimistic. Can't go wrong: you're either right OR you're surprisingly happy!!!
 

Arizona Knight

All-American
Jun 25, 2001
16,672
9,929
56
Tougher because as a collective the 10 games playing real competition will be harder to find 4 wins next year. Playing NU the first game of this year was a gift from God and VTech at the end of the year was playing much better football than when we played them. Will MSU gift us another game by imploding on special teams in the 4th quarter? Penn State was over ranked, that is a flawed offensive team and USC and UCLA have the resources to take a big step forward. Schiano should get a lot of credit for 6 wins next year, much more than this year.

Jeez, that’s a lot of minimizing in one paragraph. You are what your record says you are.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
121,576
37,230
113
The schedule next year will be as tough, if not tougher, than this year. After the first two games which are equivalent to Wagner and Temple this year, you have a VTech squad that improved throughout the year on the road. Nebraska will be improved on the road. Illinois is better than Indiana. We have had problems with Wisconsin and Maryland. MSU likely will not be in such a mess and I am sorry, anyone on this board who thinks we are beating USC, UCLA, and Washington I think you are in for a very rude awakening. Add in the fact that Wimsatt will likely be the starting QB, even with a good defense, a repeat of 6 wins would be an accomplishment.
The schedule next year is not easy but several shades down from 2023.
You take away Mich/OSU/PSU/Iowa off our schedule- only Wash is in the same level as those teams- USC/UCLA are no where near any of them...maybe Iowa
Maybe the bottom teams on the schedule are a little tougher as we all know that every other team in the B1G and ACC get better every year and we do not.
 

RUforlife

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2002
3,444
4,217
0
Some of you crack me the **** up....EVERYONE else will automatically be better - REGARDLESS of roster losses - but we won't improve.

What a way to go through life ALWAYS being negative/pessimistic. Can't go wrong: you're either right OR you're surprisingly happy!!!
Will Wimsatt be the starting QB? If so, end of discussion. If Greg Schiano can get next year's team with Wimsatt as QB to 6 wins he deserves to be COY in the B1G.
 
Last edited:

RUforlife

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2002
3,444
4,217
0
No, it really is NOT the "end of discussion." it's simply your pessimistic opinion (which you are more than welcome to have).
We are not getting beyond 6 wins next year without a QB who can throw the ball downfield. Opposing defenses are going to game plan to stop the run and if we can't take advantage of that it is going to be a long season. Again, Greg gets 6 wins with Wimsatt at QB with that schedule he deserves a lot of credit.
 

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
30,590
15,569
113
Winning the 3rd game will give an indication that can happen !!!!
.Taking the 5th,6th and 7th will do the job
Happy Dancing GIF
 

AreYouNUTS

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
120,415
53,190
113
We are not getting beyond 6 wins next year without a QB who can throw the ball downfield. Opposing defenses are going to game plan to stop the run and if we can't take advantage of that it is going to be a long season. Again, Greg gets 6 wins with Wimsatt at QB with that schedule he deserves a lot of credit.
Again, not arguing, you're more than welcome to your OPINION.
 

bigmatt718

Heisman
Mar 11, 2013
15,109
20,772
113
schedule is favorable next year - no OSU, no Mich St, no Penn St. We have to win the games we're supposed to win and have to win at least one game vs a big team (UWash, USC, UCLA, Wisky). The "good for us, we kept it close" crap won't be good enough. We have to beat a big team at some point.
UCLA is our best shot at an upset vs a name B1G school next year IMO. It's a cross country trip and from what I understand jet lag affects West Coast teams more than East Coast teams, very possible noon game on HC for us which would be a 9 am PST for them. That's the game I have circled as a potential RU upset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: colbert17

koleszar

Heisman
Jan 1, 2010
35,622
55,376
113
Tougher because as a collective the 10 games playing real competition will be harder to find 4 wins next year. Playing NU the first game of this year was a gift from God and VTech at the end of the year was playing much better football than when we played them. Will MSU gift us another game by imploding on special teams in the 4th quarter? Penn State was over ranked, that is a flawed offensive team and USC and UCLA have the resources to take a big step forward. Schiano should get a lot of credit for 6 wins next year, much more than this year.
Man, that is a helluva way to discount wins, as not being good. They weren't good when you played them, so you beat no one good. That's really stretching it, just to prove that we weren't as good as our record. If they were to beat a top 25 team, you'd discount it as they had an off day, or so and so was hurt or everyone has a fluke game now or then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arizona Knight

MADHAT1

Heisman
Apr 1, 2003
30,590
15,569
113
Again, not arguing, you're more than welcome to your OPINION.
My opinion:
If Wimsatt finally shows the talent he's supposed to posses in 2024. RU might win up to 10 games.
Same type of play as usual, hoping for a 6-8 win season if the D holds up and Monangai has another great season with Brown being a good one as well when in the game.
Without Gavin being dependable in the air, RU's legs will need to carry the load in order foer Rutgers to have any chance of being a bowl team in 2024.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AreYouNUTS

rutgersfan1766

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2005
2,561
2,736
0
UCLA is our best shot at an upset vs a name B1G school next year IMO. It's a cross country trip and from what I understand jet lag affects West Coast teams more than East Coast teams, very possible noon game on HC for us which would be a 9 am PST for them. That's the game I have circled as a potential RU upset.
We will beat UCLA. It's the Bruins second cross country trip in 3 weeks. The jet lag will catch up to them. Washington comes to NJ for their first away game of the year. Schedule VERY favorable next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigmatt718

PSU_Nut_rivals17625

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
14,642
2,609
0
Barring major injuries. I think there is a chance.
Schedule, player development, 8-10 wins. Tulane, James Madison, Liberty, SMU are on that list now.
I think 8 wins is not going to do it. There were eight 8-4 P5 teams last year. Only two made and they had wins over ranked teams and Rutgers is likely not going to get the benefit of the doubt from voters. Since most voters don't actually watch all the games it takes style points and Rutgers offense style is not going to impress voters reading the box scored. Likely it going to take 9 wins and with the schedule front heavy next year I just don't see them getting to 9 wins.

The schedule is deceptively hard. After the two cupcakes and a bye week it get much harder. It will be tough to win even three of the next six as I see Rutgers only be favored in maybe 2 of the games.. VT improved so much as the year went on and Blacksburg is a tough place to play. Rutgers still doesn't have the horses yet to beat a top 5 Washington team. If Rhule does land a Qb like McCord Nebraska will much improved and another tough place to win in Lincoln. Following that is a physical game with Wisconsin who should improve in Fickle second year. UCLA at home might be the best chance to pick up a win but certainly with their offense will not be easy. USC is loaded with talent and going on the road cross country isn't easy. Once again a tough match up with a high powered offense. I just can't see them coming out of that stretch with less than 3 loses more likely ending winning 1 or 2. The final four are all winnable especially Maryland losing Tagovailoa. It will all be determined by how healthy Rutgers is after the second by week. I think Rutgers likely finishes 3-1. I think they finishing right around 6-6. I think the floor is pretty much 5-7 with the ceiling at 7-5 barring any major portal pick up at QB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: colbert17 and vkj91

rutgersfan1766

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2005
2,561
2,736
0
I think 8 wins is not going to do it. There were eight 8-4 P5 teams last year. Only two made and they had wins over ranked teams and Rutgers is likely not going to get the benefit of the doubt from voters. Since most voters don't actually watch all the games it takes style points and Rutgers offense style is not going to impress voters reading the box scored. Likely it going to take 9 wins and with the schedule front heavy next year I just don't see them getting to 9 wins.

The schedule is deceptively hard. After the two cupcakes and a bye week it get much harder. It will be tough to win even three of the next six as I see Rutgers only be favored in maybe 2 of the games.. VT improved so much as the year went on and Blacksburg is a tough place to play. Rutgers still doesn't have the horses yet to beat a top 5 Washington team. If Rhule does land a Qb like McCord Nebraska will much improved and another tough place to win in Lincoln. Following that is a physical game with Wisconsin who should improve in Fickle second year. UCLA at home might be the best chance to pick up a win but certainly with their offense will not be easy. USC is loaded with talent and going on the road cross country isn't easy. Once again a tough match up with a high powered offense. I just can't see them coming out of that stretch with less than 3 loses more likely ending winning 1 or 2. The final four are all winnable especially Maryland losing Tagovailoa. It will all be determined by how healthy Rutgers is after the second by week. I think Rutgers likely finishes 3-1. I think they finishing right around 6-6. I think the floor is pretty much 5-7 with the ceiling at 7-5 barring any major portal pick up at QB.
Washington expecting to have 3 first round picks in this upcoming draft. Going on the road with a new team for the first time can be a challenge. Hoping Washington game is moved to Friday night for a blackout game.