Rutgers -10 vs Temple

RULoyal

Heisman
Jul 28, 2001
14,877
17,598
113
Every time I hear about how a team is really Angry about last year and will be ready to stomp us, I think of HB Blades from Pitt in ‘06, and George Selvie at USF.
Lol

 

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
23,111
11,877
113
I would agree with your argument if we didn't play them last year in Warner's first start as a true freshman and luckily walk away with a 16-14 victory. Remember, Warner had the ball at the end of the game to win it, he is much improved since then. Temple is in year 2 of a rebuild and has 50 new players. If you watch that game against Akron, they slept thru the first half which is to be expected with that many new players. I think the second half both offensively and defensively is more indicative of what you will see against us on Saturday. That is also why I believe the line is only 10 points.
Akron is the bottom of the MAC
Sleepwalking is far from an excuse.
Akron blew an opportunity to retake the lead in the 2nd Half.
Temple winning by 2 points at home speaks volume.
Unless we are a turnover machine on Saturday this won’t be close at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nutfromSEC117

RUSK97

All-American
Dec 28, 2007
10,460
6,550
0
Maybe. And every game is different. On the other hand, that game was played at Temple in what was likely dubbed the biggest game of their season from their fans perspective. We also committed 80 yards worth of penalties in the game, and lost Gavin early in the game to injury. Schiano clearly didn’t trust Evan to throw much, and it was quite obvious that we just were not prepared for Evan to be the only remaining scholarship QB available. That wasn’t what the team had prepared for in camp or even game week since the plan wouldve been to rotate between Gavin and Evan with Noah unavailable. All that doesn’t mean Temple won’t put up a fight, but there are a lot of factors that differentiate this game significantly. Its early, but I also believe our defense is better this year.
Of course no one remembers the game really wasn’t as close as the score indicates. TU turned over the ball on downs their last drive in their own territory. RU drove the ball down to TU’s 3 yard line and opted to run the clock out rather than punching it in (after much success running the ball).
 

LotusAggressor_rivals

All-American
Oct 11, 2003
15,289
7,032
113
I don’t think Wimsatt is really an RPO QB. He doesn’t appear to have the natural instincts required. He is more like a wildcat QB with more options. But I agree that the offense would be a lot more effective if he were a real RPO running threat and could stretch the defense. His running in the second half was predictable and easy to defend.
You mean he isn't a zone read QB.
 

RU Diesel07110

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2007
3,280
1,647
0
Don’t remember that. NW QB made some nice throws into tight window. the underneath stuff was open by design
Don’t know how good Warner is bt NE Qb threw for almost 200 yds before getting pulled and missed a lot of open receivers.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
121,612
37,273
113
This is a game that the line is moving because of betting and nothing to do with the game.
 
Jul 28, 2017
296
247
0
Totally different game LY if RU doesn’t drop easy pick 6 that hit DB in chest on first play of game
Temple's Nate Stewart also dropped an easy touchdown pass from Warner in the second quarter 10 yards behind all the defenders and right between the 1 and the 8 on his jersey. Two can play that game. Warner doesn't give up tipped touchdown passes anymore either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,744
10,869
78
Temple's Nate Stewart also dropped an easy touchdown pass from Warner in the second quarter 10 yards behind all the defenders and right between the 1 and the 8 on his jersey. Two can play that game. Warner doesn't give up tipped touchdown passes anymore either.

True. But we also chose to take a knee at the Temple 3 on 1st down. Right or wrong, there’d be less upset alert buzz generally right now if we punched the ball into the end zone instead with time expiring as the final scoreboard would’ve said 23-14 instead.
 

RUforlife

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2002
3,444
4,217
0
True. But we also chose to take a knee at the Temple 3 on 1st down. Right or wrong, there’d be less upset alert buzz generally right now if we punched the ball into the end zone instead with time expiring as the final scoreboard would’ve said 23-14 instead.
True, but that was after Temple had the ball to win the game and our defense came up big. I sure hope Greg and the team aren't as dismissive of Temple as some of our fans, we have a great opportunity to start 3-0 and win 4/5, only thing that is going to stop us is if the team adopts the attitude of our cocky fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soulcitywalker

Kbee3

Heisman
Aug 23, 2002
43,724
35,255
0
True, but that was after Temple had the ball to win the game and our defense came up big. I sure hope Greg and the team aren't as dismissive of Temple as some of our fans, we have a great opportunity to start 3-0 and win 4/5, only thing that is going to stop us is if the team adopts the attitude of our cocky fans.
More likely that a regression from our quarterback and/or O-line could stop us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soulcitywalker

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,744
10,869
78
More people picking Temple +9 makes me fell better. Keep’em coming.

I hope this lights a fire under our guys. I know transitive property doesn’t ever apply as each game is different, but after only one game it’s the only data to go by. Playing on the road vs home is always worth a few points. So a Temple “free pick” is essentially saying Akron figures to be as good or better than Rutgers this season. No other way to interpret that comment right now.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
121,612
37,273
113
Exactly thunder, always fade the public
He doesn’t understand he is actually giving Temple too much credit for their 3 point win at home against Akron
Who knows how the game ends up but to use our 24-7 win against a P5 when they had 3 points on Akron. Too funny
 

Miggins

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2001
1,547
2,310
112
Line dropped to 7.5 this morning. Really interesting. Cannot see a single Rutgers "undisclosed" injury that would move the line. It has move 2.5 points since open which is a lot.

We would be ~4.5 favorites only on a neutral field? Only 1.5 point favorite if game at Temple?

Wow, but this makes me wonder (and makes me a bit nervous)
 

RUSK97

All-American
Dec 28, 2007
10,460
6,550
0
He doesn’t understand he is actually giving Temple too much credit for their 3 point win at home against Akron
Who knows how the game ends up but to use our 24-7 win against a P5 when they had 3 points on Akron. Too funny
I can’t figure out why TU didn’t blow the doors off Akron. Unless Joe Moorhead really improved Akron that much.
 

Extra Point_rivals157299

All-Conference
Aug 9, 2001
13,169
4,691
0
I understand the thinking of people picking Temple, Rutgers rarely runs up scores on teams. If RU gets a two possession score we go into protect the lead mode and call more conservative plays on offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jtung230

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
121,612
37,273
113
Line dropped to 7.5 this morning. Really interesting. Cannot see a single Rutgers "undisclosed" injury that would move the line. It has move 2.5 points since open which is a lot.

We would be ~4.5 favorites only on a neutral field? Only 1.5 point favorite if game at Temple?

Wow, but this makes me wonder (and makes me a bit nervous)
Doesn’t the line move like that misting to change the betting if there is no obvious injury or something?
 

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
23,111
11,877
113
Line dropped to 7.5 this morning. Really interesting. Cannot see a single Rutgers "undisclosed" injury that would move the line. It has move 2.5 points since open which is a lot.

We would be ~4.5 favorites only on a neutral field? Only 1.5 point favorite if game at Temple?

Wow, but this makes me wonder (and makes me a bit nervous)
Maybe the transfer WR not receiving the Waiver (yet) is impacting the line.