Football Rutgers opens as 31.5pt underdogs to Michigan

LotusAggressor_rivals

All-American
Oct 11, 2003
15,281
7,018
113
Are we going to actually get to see this game, or are we going to have to sit through Iowa or Minnesota playing Directional Drillbit Tech or Jabronie U?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Joey Bags

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
7,896
4,358
66
No one will complain about losing to the top teams in the division and conference if we show some competitiveness. But another 1-8 conference record and getting fewer first downs than the other teams’ # of touchdowns should be the beginning of the end for GS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EmptySeats

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
64,384
43,483
113
Vegas is smart. If it was around +17, I was gonna bet Mich to cover. Im not buying that we are as good as everyone is shouting
I assume you're not an RU fan, as I can't imagine any RU fan ever betting against RU.
 

sct1111

All-American
Nov 30, 2014
6,054
8,245
113
Honestly, not better IMO.

Sure, the defense is better this year. It’s been very good so far. Best defense of 2.0, yes.

But I don’t think the offense is better, I don’t think the specials are better (no Korsak or Cruickshank). And I think the conference schedule is harder.

Which of my opinions above do you disagree with and give this team the edge ?
Yes the defense is better. So we agree on that. That's actually a big deal. Don't know why you're dismissing that.

The offense is actually objectively better. More points scored vs first 3 FBS opponents. Less turnovers.

Also the conference is definitely not as good as last year. If you've been watching teams like Wisconsin, Iowa, even Ohio State not nearly as impressive as previous years. Our FG kicker is better than last year. Mcattamny hits bombs for kickoffs.
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
Are we going to actually get to see this game, or are we going to have to sit through Iowa or Minnesota playing Directional Drillbit Tech or Jabronie U?
What does 256 yds of rushing confirm?
It confirms we can move the ball. Same as someone who throws for 200 + yards and scores only 16 points . We eat clock … we punish people… I get it all those 4-5 * should win …problem is sometimes the team who should win doesn’t
 

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
I assume you're not an RU fan, as I can't imagine any RU fan ever betting against RU.
He’s not that posting history will verify that. As Colbert said they are back knowing the opponent up next.No shame if we lose to Michigan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: colbert17

UMRU

All-Conference
Sep 19, 2006
7,637
3,865
113
i saw that the line was down to 25.5 already. A lot of money must have been put on RU
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,744
10,869
78
43 yards of passing offense would tend to confirm that.

So I’ve been pretty hard on Gavin. I think this should be flipped a little here though.

While he didn’t have a good passing day, his yardage has to be taken with a grain of salt because he only attempted 16 passes (Army threw more than us on Sat). While his completion percentage isn’t good enough, some of the shots he took down field (even though they weren’t caught) were instrumental in setting up the runs later in the series (VTech had to respect the deep threat possibility). It’s such a small sample size that a couple more catches and Gavin’s percentage completion would look way better. He only threw 9 incomplete passes in the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgHoops

RUBOB72

All-American
Aug 5, 2004
23,385
7,924
0
That’s true if he threw another 10-12 passes he may perhaps hit several longer gains but can’t worry about it we won and that’s the bottom line.
 

Captain Hogleg

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2006
3,021
3,936
68
No one will complain about losing to the top teams in the division and conference if we show some competitiveness. But another 1-8 conference record and getting fewer first downs than the other teams’ # of touchdowns should be the beginning of the end for GS.
Get lost. The guy has systematically revitalized this program and it’s continuing to trend in a positive direction. He’s not going anywhere so get behind the guy and stop being a dick.
 

Branchrentals

All-American
Sep 2, 2022
4,011
8,906
103
Seeing RU +25 right now. That‘s a no go for me. Would need at least 28.

Maryland -6.5 against the dumpster fire Mich St. Going to take Maryland for sure.

Saw Fla St. -2.5 against Clemson. Taking Fla St. in that one.
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
I see this as something like 42-14

30 and under take Michigan and lay the points
30.5 and over I would take rutgers
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
121,604
37,256
113
because we’ve seen this movie before. What was our record after 3 games in 2021 and 2022?
Well- In 2021- we beat Temple, Your team, Delaware and then went to the big house and played them straight up in a close loss 20-13
2022 - BC, Wagner, Temple and then again- close loss to Iowa 27-10 that was actually closer than it's score

2023- 2 P5 and a G5 blowouts. first 3 harder than both of those years you mentioned

Thanks for the positive look...makes me feel even better for this upcoming game. Sometimes you surprise me with these very positive posts...
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU848789

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,744
10,869
78
I see this as something like 42-14

30 and under take Michigan and lay the points
30.5 and over I would take rutgers
Personally I wouldn’t touch a spread like this period. Once MOV is over 21 points, it becomes pretty meaningless. Michigan has yet to score a 4th quarter TD. They’ve elected to put their subs in and run out the clock up big.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ILikePike

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
64,384
43,483
113
It'll be hugely important to get off to a good start, as our offense is not built to come from behind, but then again, I think it's going to be very hard to be competitive with them with a vanilla offense - so we're going to have to take some chances with Gavin's arm and maybe a trick play or two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ILikePike

realhoops2

Senior
Jul 8, 2015
972
902
93
So I’ve been pretty hard on Gavin. I think this should be flipped a little here though.

While he didn’t have a good passing day, his yardage has to be taken with a grain of salt because he only attempted 16 passes (Army threw more than us on Sat). While his completion percentage isn’t good enough, some of the shots he took down field (even though they weren’t caught) were instrumental in setting up the runs later in the series (VTech had to respect the deep threat possibility). It’s such a small sample size that a couple more catches and Gavin’s percentage completion would look way better. He only threw 9 incomplete passes in the game.
I think GW accuracy issues are overblown although he did not have his best passing game. He had at least 3 drops I recall, 2 by Monangai and 1 by Langan. Factor those in and he's 10 for 16 and 62% against VT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GillesDeleuze

UMRU

All-Conference
Sep 19, 2006
7,637
3,865
113
UM fans do not believe UM will cover a 25 point spread. Hard to say they are wrong - UM's offense has not been anywhere close to elite - 30, 35 and 31 points against weak competition. I'm guessing Vegas must be counting on a multiple Wimsatt INTs and RU wearing down in the 4th quarter like last year
 

RUfromNJ

All-Conference
Oct 23, 2007
4,449
3,141
0
Honestly, not better IMO.

Sure, the defense is better this year. It’s been very good so far. Best defense of 2.0, yes.

But I don’t think the offense is better, I don’t think the specials are better (no Korsak or Cruickshank). And I think the conference schedule is harder.

Which of my opinions above do you disagree with and give this team the edge ?
2021

vs. Temple (124) - 21 1st downs, 365 yards, 52 pts scored
at Syracuse (87) - 15 1st downs, 195 yards, 17 pts scored
vs. Delaware (FCS) - 24 1st downs, 493 yards. 45 pts scored

Avg - Defensive Massey rating against (106), 20 1st downs, 351 yards, 38 pts scored

2022

at Boston College (112) - 17 1st downs, 322 yards, 22 pts scored
vs. Wagner (FCS) - 33 1st downs, 585 yards, 66 pts scored
at Temple (122) - 12 1st downs, 201 yards, 9 pts scored

Avg - Defensive Massey rating against (117) 20 1st downs, 369 yards, 32 pts scored

2023

vs. Northwestern (61) - 20 1st downs, 285 yards, 24 pts scored
vs. Temple (117) - 20 1st downs, 452 yards, 36 pts scored
vs. Virginia Tech (66) - 14 1st downs, 302 yards, 35 pts scored

Avg - Defensive Massey rating against (81), 18 1st downs, 346 yards, 32 pts scored

Unless you go by sheer numbers and disregard who they've played, this offense has been objectively better. It's not going to set the world on fire with big plays in the passing game just yet, but they're a top-20 rushing attack nationally, averaging 211 rushing yards/game and have scored 9 TDs. I'd venture to guess that not many/any of the schools ahead of RU have played 3 FBS teams.
 
Last edited:

MiamiWolv

Heisman
Nov 2, 2006
11,537
19,744
113
Harbough is a dik will try to run it up & use it in recruiting.

No--Michigan likes to get ahead and put it on cruise control. It's not leaving starters in any longer than necessary, and if they play, it will be supervanilla once gets is at hand.

I don't see Michigan covering this number unless Rutgers starts turning it over by throwing once its behind.

More likely, if the game is clean, and neither team turns it over, Michigan will methodically play away, and both coaches will be content to be rather conservative, and avoid subjecting their key players to potentially serious injuries once the game is decided.

I expect a quick game (RU will run the ball even if losing), and a Michigan win around the likes of 27-7.
 

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
23,107
11,874
113
Seeing RU +25 right now. That‘s a no go for me. Would need at least 28.

Maryland -6.5 against the dumpster fire Mich St. Going to take Maryland for sure.

Saw Fla St. -2.5 against Clemson. Taking Fla St. in that one.
No go ? You are missing out.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
7,896
4,358
66
Yes the defense is better. So we agree on that. That's actually a big deal. Don't know why you're dismissing that.

The offense is actually objectively better. More points scored vs first 3 FBS opponents. Less turnovers.

Also the conference is definitely not as good as last year. If you've been watching teams like Wisconsin, Iowa, even Ohio State not nearly as impressive as previous years. Our FG kicker is better than last year. Mcattamny hits bombs for kickoffs.

Yea, kickoffs are better too. Agree. But this is all subjective. There’s no such thing as objectively better. New players, new coaches (NW scandal) no road games yet, etc. Numbers don’t tell the story with such variation in the factors.

We have to see how the season plays out to have more informed opinions.

I do think (opinion) the offense and specials will not prove to be better
 
Feb 5, 2003
10,902
9,224
113
My guess on the line going in was +20.5, so the 31.5 is a shocker to me.

When it comes to gambling, I'm like Frank Drebin. I only gamble when I order out. See quote #6.

 

RuSnp

All-Conference
Jan 14, 2004
3,525
3,033
0
No--Michigan likes to get ahead and put it on cruise control. It's not leaving starters in any longer than necessary, and if they play, it will be supervanilla once gets is at hand.

I don't see Michigan covering this number unless Rutgers starts turning it over by throwing once its behind.

More likely, if the game is clean, and neither team turns it over, Michigan will methodically play away, and both coaches will be content to be rather conservative, and avoid subjecting their key players to potentially serious injuries once the game is decided.

I expect a quick game (RU will run the ball even if losing), and a Michigan win around the likes of 27-7.
This is reasonable.