Samantha Bee stepped in it big time. But it is what libs do.

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Self-described comedienne and left-wing political commentator Samantha Bee just insulted a man with brain cancer.

On her TBS show Full Frontal, Bee sent her correspondent, Mike Rubens, to CPAC to find out what a conservative is “these days,” because she has “no f***ing clue what conservatism means.” Duly noted.

The video of Rubens’ time there is nothing more than mocking everything he sees with a sarcastic voiceover. They called the clip, “Whither Conservatism: ein film für Full Frontal.” That’s so they could compare conservatives to Nazis, of course.

As was declared by The Washington Post last year, a favorite hipster haircut for celebs and skinny-jeaned latte sippers — shaved sides, and a pile of gelled hair on top — now means you’re a white nationalist. Not everyone got that "memo" so, the style is still popular and Rubens noticed several CPAC attendees sporting it. He remarked:

“Just last year, CPAC was dominated by Ted Cruz supporters and chirpy little sh*ts with bow ties… This year, the bow ties were gone, replaced with nazi hair. Nazi hair, Nazi hair, f*** off.”


Something good came out of Samantha Bee’s show this week. Kyle Coddington, who was mocked in a segment about CPAC and described as having “Nazi hair,” has received tens of thousands of dollars to support his treatment for brain cancer.

In case you missed this yesterday, Bee’s show Full Frontal did a segment on CPAC which included images of several attendees who were mocked as having “Nazi hair.” One of those people was cancer patient named Kyle Coddington. Kyle’s friends sent him a screenshot of the broadcast and he passed it along to his family. Kyle’s sister was a bit annoyed by the show calling her brother a Nazi and tweeted about it Thursday morning:

Megan Coddington‏@meg_kelly16
When @iamsambee makes fun of your brother for having "Nazi hair." He actually has stage 4 brain cancer, but whatever floats your boat.

There is good news that came out of Bee's disaster:

It wasn’t much as apologies go for calling someone a Nazi on television, but the show did do something right. It donated $1,000 to Kyle’s GoFundMe page where he was seeking help for treatment of stage 4 glioblastoma, an aggressive form of brain cancer he was diagnosed with in December. Kyle’s original fundraising goal was just $2,500 and when I looked at the page midday yesterday he had received around $5,000.

But thanks to that tweet from Kyle’s sister, his story went viral yesterday. Today he appeared on Fox News (video below) where he agreed Bee’s apology was a bit weak but thanked her sincerely for the donation to his GoFundMe page. And that’s the good news here. Since yesterday, Kyle’s GoFunMe page has received donations that are now in excess of $81,000.

Incidentally, Kyle also revealed on Fox News that he’s actually a registered Democrat who is politically moderate. He also said his diagnosis is very serious as there is no cure for the type of brain cancer he has, but he is relying on his faith and trying to stay positive.

There’s no doubt that Samantha Bee and her staff entered Kyle’s life intending to do nothing but mock his appearance and insinuate CPAC has been overrun by Nazis. But the result of Bee’s attack has been pretty positive despite that. A chain of people starting with Kyle’s friends, his mother and sister all reacted to the attack on him and now lots of people now know about Kyle’s situation and many have donated.

And it’s not just money he’s receiving. There are people chiming in on his GoFundMe page who are living with glioblastoma or have relatives who are. Some of those messages reference a verse from Genesis 50 which seems pretty appropriate in this situation: “As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive.”



 
Last edited:
Dec 17, 2007
14,542
362
83
Samantha Bee.....what a piece of ****.
I saw this today on Fox And Friends (rare, but it was on in the gym), and frankly didn't know who Samantha Bee was or what Full Frontal was. Never heard of her or the show. Does anybody watch this?

Felt sorry for Coddington, his condition is terminal, yet he shouldered through the interview with poise.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
I saw this today on Fox And Friends (rare, but it was on in the gym), and frankly didn't know who Samantha Bee was or what Full Frontal was. Never heard of her or the show. Does anybody watch this?

Felt sorry for Coddington, his condition is terminal, yet he shouldered through the interview with poise.

She's a liberal icon. Obviously, I have never watched her show but it seems to be very popular on the left.
 

op2

Senior
Mar 16, 2014
11,170
537
103
I saw this today on Fox And Friends (rare, but it was on in the gym), and frankly didn't know who Samantha Bee was or what Full Frontal was. Never heard of her or the show. Does anybody watch this?

Felt sorry for Coddington, his condition is terminal, yet he shouldered through the interview with poise.

Full Frontal is a show that's on (I think) once per week on TBS. I don't have cable but I got TBS for a few months on Sling TV for football season. I didn't watch Full Frontal. I don't know if I'm aging out of their demographic or if those shows are changing to not suit me but I don't watch those night time shows...Fallon, Daily Show, Colbert, Kimmel, etc...like I used to.

I haven't scientifically researched this but I think they are getting more political. I like political jokes and satire but not when it's too one sided and becomes preachy. From what I could tell that's what Samantha Bee's show was like and that's why I didn't watch although since I never actually saw the show I could be wrong.

I think the left is losing track of the ball culturally a bit. Shortly after Trump won I was reading an NYT article about people to blame for Trump winning, the point being not the people but on the left that weren't tough enough on Trump. As if people on the left weren't tough enough on Trump and thus people weren't driven away from voting for Trump. Jimmy Fallon was on the list. Apparently Trump was on Fallon's show before the election and in the opinion of the NYT article Fallon wasn't tough enough on Trump and thus not as many people were driven away from Trump.

I don't think the writer gets it. Late night shows that constantly rip Trump don't drive people away from Trump. The people that enjoy seeing Trump get ripped on are already voting for the other side.

Another one is Letterman. I recently read that he said if he still had his show he'd be giving Trump all kinds of grief, yadda, yadda. He doesn't get it. People don't go to Letterman to to tell them how to vote. They go to him to be entertained. When he gets political it excites the people that like his views (who aren't going to vote for Trump in the first place) and it turns everybody else off, including people that might be against Trump but who are going to the Letterman show to get away from politics.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Full Frontal is a show that's on (I think) once per week on TBS. I don't have cable but I got TBS for a few months on Sling TV for football season. I didn't watch Full Frontal. I don't know if I'm aging out of their demographic or if those shows are changing to not suit me but I don't watch those night time shows...Fallon, Daily Show, Colbert, Kimmel, etc...like I used to.

I haven't scientifically researched this but I think they are getting more political. I like political jokes and satire but not when it's too one sided and becomes preachy. From what I could tell that's what Samantha Bee's show was like and that's why I didn't watch although since I never actually saw the show I could be wrong.

I think the left is losing track of the ball culturally a bit. Shortly after Trump won I was reading an NYT article about people to blame for Trump winning, the point being not the people but on the left that weren't tough enough on Trump. As if people on the left weren't tough enough on Trump and thus people weren't driven away from voting for Trump. Jimmy Fallon was on the list. Apparently Trump was on Fallon's show before the election and in the opinion of the NYT article Fallon wasn't tough enough on Trump and thus not as many people were driven away from Trump.

I don't think the writer gets it. Late night shows that constantly rip Trump don't drive people away from Trump. The people that enjoy seeing Trump get ripped on are already voting for the other side.

Another one is Letterman. I recently read that he said if he still had his show he'd be giving Trump all kinds of grief, yadda, yadda. He doesn't get it. People don't go to Letterman to to tell them how to vote. They go to him to be entertained. When he gets political it excites the people that like his views (who aren't going to vote for Trump in the first place) and it turns everybody else off, including people that might be against Trump but who are going to the Letterman show to get away from politics.

Excellent analysis. I think people are so tired of being told what to think by entertainers. It just turns them off. They just want to watch a show and enjoy themselves. Can't do that very much anymore.

Maher' show is different. Politics is expected and is expected to be very left of center (although Maher has ticked off many libs because of his Muslim comments).
 

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,535
150
63
Fortunately she called attention to his plight. With the funds raised his chances of beating this are better than ever.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,688
1,758
113
Excellent analysis. I think people are so tired of being told what to think by entertainers. It just turns them off. They just want to watch a show and enjoy themselves. Can't do that very much anymore.

Maher' show is different. Politics is expected and is expected to be very left of center (although Maher has ticked off many libs because of his Muslim comments).
I've almost gotten to the point of being in opposition to celebrities just on shear principle. Oh, Kim Kardashian has an opinion? Great. Whatever it is, being on the opposing side of that dim witted ***** is likely the correct answer.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
I've almost gotten to the point of being in opposition to celebrities just on shear principle. Oh, Kim Kardashian has an opinion? Great. Whatever it is, being on the opposing side of that dim witted ***** is likely the correct answer.

Entertainers have never been more involved in politics and generally more uninformed.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
I haven't scientifically researched this but I think they are getting more political. I like political jokes and satire but not when it's too one sided and becomes preachy.

Trump has given them an endless supply of material. It's easy pickins.

I don't think the writer gets it. Late night shows that constantly rip Trump don't drive people away from Trump. The people that enjoy seeing Trump get ripped on are already voting for the other side.

Another one is Letterman. I recently read that he said if he still had his show he'd be giving Trump all kinds of grief, yadda, yadda. He doesn't get it. People don't go to Letterman to to tell them how to vote. They go to him to be entertained. When he gets political it excites the people that like his views (who aren't going to vote for Trump in the first place) and it turns everybody else off, including people that might be against Trump but who are going to the Letterman show to get away from politics.

These shows aren't trying to win the conservatives or convince them to vote the other way. They are making fun of the conservatives and that is their purpose. If conservatives don't like it, don't watch it. They don't care. They are appealing to the left and they are funny, correct that, downright hilarious, to the left viewers.
 

op2

Senior
Mar 16, 2014
11,170
537
103
This is the chick from the daily show, right?

Yes but it's been many years since she's been on the Daily Show. It's been like 1.5 years since Stewart left and I think Samantha Bee left way before that. I liked Stewart and I just don't like the new guy that much. Maybe I'm just getting old and can't relate to young humor anymore. I hope not.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,688
1,758
113
Yes but it's been many years since she's been on the Daily Show. It's been like 1.5 years since Stewart left and I think Samantha Bee left way before that. I liked Stewart and I just don't like the new guy that much. Maybe I'm just getting old and can't relate to young humor anymore. I hope not.
I like her on TDS. I thought she was pretty funny. Liberal icon is a stretch.
 
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
Self-described comedienne and left-wing political commentator Samantha Bee just insulted a man with brain cancer.

On her TBS show Full Frontal, Bee sent her correspondent, Mike Rubens, to CPAC to find out what a conservative is “these days,” because she has “no f***ing clue what conservatism means.” Duly noted.

The video of Rubens’ time there is nothing more than mocking everything he sees with a sarcastic voiceover. They called the clip, “Whither Conservatism: ein film für Full Frontal.” That’s so they could compare conservatives to Nazis, of course.

As was declared by The Washington Post last year, a favorite hipster haircut for celebs and skinny-jeaned latte sippers — shaved sides, and a pile of gelled hair on top — now means you’re a white nationalist. Not everyone got that "memo" so, the style is still popular and Rubens noticed several CPAC attendees sporting it. He remarked:

“Just last year, CPAC was dominated by Ted Cruz supporters and chirpy little sh*ts with bow ties… This year, the bow ties were gone, replaced with nazi hair. Nazi hair, Nazi hair, f*** off.”


Something good came out of Samantha Bee’s show this week. Kyle Coddington, who was mocked in a segment about CPAC and described as having “Nazi hair,” has received tens of thousands of dollars to support his treatment for brain cancer.

In case you missed this yesterday, Bee’s show Full Frontal did a segment on CPAC which included images of several attendees who were mocked as having “Nazi hair.” One of those people was cancer patient named Kyle Coddington. Kyle’s friends sent him a screenshot of the broadcast and he passed it along to his family. Kyle’s sister was a bit annoyed by the show calling her brother a Nazi and tweeted about it Thursday morning:

Megan Coddington‏@meg_kelly16
When @iamsambee makes fun of your brother for having "Nazi hair." He actually has stage 4 brain cancer, but whatever floats your boat.

Not sure what is worse, Trump mocking a disabled man or this piece of crap making fun of a brain cancer patient.
 

op2

Senior
Mar 16, 2014
11,170
537
103
Trump has given them an endless supply of material. It's easy pickins.



These shows aren't trying to win the conservatives or convince them to vote the other way. They are making fun of the conservatives and that is their purpose. If conservatives don't like it, don't watch it. They don't care. They are appealing to the left and they are funny, correct that, downright hilarious, to the left viewers.

I actually agree that they're not really trying to convince people but rather just appealing to their audience but I think that some don't get that, which is why the NYT says Jimmy Fallon not being hard enough on Trump is a reason Trump won. It seems that some are under the impression that if those shows go harder and harder on Trump then his chances of winning get less and less. When they see that they think they're not only being entertained but they're also increasing their chances of winning the election. I disagree with them.
 

op2

Senior
Mar 16, 2014
11,170
537
103

I think I'm just getting out of touch with what appeals to people on this front, or maybe I'm not realizing that people like the humor to be overtly political. The same thing happened with SNL. I'd watch Baldwin every week doing Trump and think how mediocre it was and how much better Darrell Hammond was at impersonating Trump. And after awhile of that I read an article of how SNLs ratings were way up. I thought it would be unappealing and instead it was appealing. I'm getting old.
 

op2

Senior
Mar 16, 2014
11,170
537
103

I just watched the piece. Forget that the guy had cancer, which of course nobody knew until afterwards. I simply don't see how anyone can find that remotely funny. We've gone from using politics as a pretext for making good humor, and maybe making some political points in the process, to using humor as a pretext for pushing politics.

And of course the left isn't alone in this. The right does it plenty. What I don't understand is why people enjoy watching it. The politics so trumps (no pun intended) the humor why not just have a straight political show?

To me, the absolute first rule of comedy is "Be Funny." Everything else has to service that. That doesn't mean you can't be political too but rather that the politics has to be subservient to the comedy. Jon Stewart, who was strong left, accomplished this IMO and he only went off the air a year and a half ago so it's not like we're talking about back in the Dark Ages.

I realize I may sound like I'm about to tell the kids to get off my lawn but that's how I see it.