Saw this on another site.

big red23

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2003
9,957
1,267
113
1. Bo had a temperament that was in check the first 5 years. Within tolerable ranges. It was his last 2 years while working under SE that it really came out. His frustration with no support and SE's management style put him over the top. When he was bitching about the fans that was taken out of context and he was referring to the few fans that had high expectations not understanding some of the limitations being put on his program. False, his temperament changed on November of 2011 after the Texas A&M loss. That is when he felt our administration did not have his back, and installed the "us against the world" mentality <<< He needed let go as soon as that mentality set in.

2. Bo didn't mind the recruiting as much as he hated the recruiting game. He probably had one of the best ideas in regards to recruiting when he said there should be no NLI day. Make an offer to a kid and if he accepts then sign the papers. Bo was a straight shooter and didn't like playing some of the recruiting games such as flipping and tweeting and having to cuddle recruits egos. This is also called being lazy

3. Bo didn't have Andy Vaughn. He had to use Ross Ells as his recruiting coordinator. Everyone knows the coordinator job, to be done right, needed to be full time but somehow it only became available once MR was hired. In fact he was hired in the first few weeks that MR was here making him an early addition. Imagine if Trent Bay was having to do all the Recruiting Coordination in addition to linebacker duties and linebacker recruiting. My understanding......and I can't prove this......is the Andy Vaughn connection was with SE and that SE held out hiring him until Bo was fired. Now what I don't know in this equation is why a recruiting coordinator wasn't hired when TO was still AD. I'm really not sure when the NCAA started allowing that or if money was a problem early on in the entry into the B1G. Maybe it was new enough or just the way TO and Nebraska had always done it. No clue on this, but it really doesn't matter, what I listed above is the reason he was let go. End of story
 

ssmill777

Junior
Nov 10, 2004
6,621
332
0
All very true especially in hindsight. I have made the same general argument on here for the past month or so and it resonates, however, one has to hold Bo accountable here too. Bo should have seen the need for the RC function, and he could have gotten it done early on in his career at Nebraska. A great CEO sees the need to delegate. Bo didn't get it done by not getting the position filled with the right level candidate. That is on Bo. GBR
This is exactly right. Bo was a good/maybe great coach, but was a terrible CEO. A good CEO hires great assistants, and handles the PR duties with class and poise. His post-game interviews were like watching a root canal.