I haven’t lied about name calling. I admitted that I called you names in the past. I do not deny it. I admit I called you names in this very thread. I do not deny it. You however refuse to admit you resorted to name calling first in this thread. You can call my comment whatever you want. It is completely true. You have your head so far in the air because of some sense of superiority that you require a damn parachute to get to the ground. If you were have as perfect as you thought you were, they would’ve nailed your *** to a cross. That’s the shoe you choose to wear so if it fits, lace that ***** up and wear it.
Prove I called you a stalker in this thread before you used the term.
Seems simple, doesn't it? Businesses should be free to provide services to whomever they wish and refuse service to whoever they wish. The free market will take care of the rest. If they refuse enough people, they'll go out of business. Meanwhile, customers can patronize whatever business they prefer and stay away from whatever business they don't want to give their money. They can even call for a boycott. The free market takes care of the rest. Everyone is free in this scenario. For my part, if taking part in any business venture conflicts with anyone's closely held religious beliefs, I think they should be able to refuse service without repercussions.
Yeah, pretty sure the Civil Rights Act took care of that one. I agree though... in this day and age they frankly ought to remove it. I think it's a waste of time for the government - especially one that will continually be one-sided - to be in the business of trying to figure out who's being racist.
All you have to do is go back and look. The first reference to stalker in this thread by either of us was you posting “^ stalker post” which I replied to with the same thing. You won’t ever admit anything. Your huge all encompassing ego won’t allow it. I’ve seen it in your exchanges with others in multiple threads. In your world (or mind), you are never wrong. So I will repeat for the third time. If you were half as perfect as you thought you were, they would’ve nailed your *** to a cross. That sums it up simple perfectly.
I doubt people are ready to get rid of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. But, I get the point. In today’s age, it is hard to believe the racist establishment would survive with citizens refusing to patronize. On the other hand, it would probably be better to know what businesses you don’t want to give your money to. That is why no one believes that the trans person innocently picked the baker in Colorado. He was targeted because his beliefs are considered abhorrent by a segment of our society, when that person could have gone to any baker with whom they have agreement.
Colorado created a government enforced put-you-out-of-business statute that says “your speech shall agree!” The Court concluded the statute was unconstitutional, but also stressed in its opinion that the woman’s refusal to speak was not because of someone’s sexuality, but because of her sincerely held religious belief. Would the SCOTUS take a case where she says that personal belief extends to all gay people, regardless of the content of the speech? I don’t think the Court takes that case, but does this opinion extend to that case?
My mistake. You called me ignorant in this post first and I responded with stalker. Fact is still the same that you resorted to name calling in this thread first. I’ve always said you resorted to name calling first in this thread which you did.
We all know what you meant with that passive aggressive veiled attempt at name calling. Stalker post is an opinion I still hold. So if ignorant post doesn’t count as namecalling neither does stalker post. You still name called in this thread first with snowflake then so my point still remains. Tap dance around all you want. My point still remains.
Not trying to muddy up anything. He can stop replying to me as easily as I can to him. Why not tell him to stop muddying up the thread with his insults? If I wanted there to be insults I would have been the one to initiate namecalling. He was the one to initiate it. Maybe you should lecture him or are you too busy patting him on the back for doing the same thing you accuse me of doing.
We can agree to disagree and had it been left at that we wouldn’t be here now. However, even after that passive aggressive attempt, he did refer to me as a snowflake. That is namecalling no matter how you slice it.
Kind of like judging people like you just did. You can read and follow your Jewish book of fairytales all you want. Since you give me permission to reject certain behaviors, I reject your bigotry and hatred.
Jesus f’in christ
. Scary.Most of the people whining bout the decision have never owned a business, yet want to lecture others on how to run a business.
I haven’t seen much if any bigotry from the LGBT community. I’ve only seen them want to be accepted for who they are. I’ve only seen them want to be able to walk down the street holding hands or kissing their partner just like heterosexual couples do on a daily basis. When a gay couple does it, people like you say they are trying to throw it in your face without that same complaint against a heterosexual couple. I’ve only seen LGBT people finally be able to be proud of who they are and not have to hide it from society. I’ve only seen LGBT community want to be able to go out and live their life without having to worry about being beaten, tied to a fence, and left for dead like Matthew Shepherd. If those things the LGBT community is doing is bigotry and hate to you, then you have warped sense of what those words mean.
You realize homosexuality has been around for 1000s of years in most EVERY society right?
Simply false. Show me an atheist who has attacked a Christian simply for being Christian. Show me a member of the LGBT community attack a straight person simply for being straight. I can show you plenty of Christians doing it. I can show you plenty of straight people doing it. Hell, it has happened in this very thread.
Well said.
Ha, yes atheists a running around torching churches and gang beating christians. Terrible plight for these christians i say. They desperately need legal protection.
Are you in the 8th grade still?
Yeah, that is what Christians are doing to atheists. Wow, you cannot hold a linear thought.
Nice post atheist. Common sense atheists everywhere are wishing you would shut up.
You are in the 8th grade still.Yeah, that is what Christians are doing to atheists. Wow, you cannot hold a linear thought.
No he’s not. He is being attacked for refusing to provide a service to a gay couple. His excuse is his Christian beliefs. Those beliefs aren’t being attacked. His business practices are. Those practices would still be attacked if he refused to serve the gay couple using a different excuse. There is a huge difference.
I cannot stop your from lying to yourself and rejecting reality. Have a great day.
