SCOTUS shocks many and agrees to take another religious liberty case in the Fall

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Supreme Court takes on new clash of gay rights, religion. I believe if Kennedy retires, the Cakeshop wins this case.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is taking on a new clash between gay rights and religion in a case about a wedding cake for a same-sex couple in Colorado.

The justices said Monday they will consider whether a baker who objects to same-sex marriage on religious grounds can refuse to make a wedding cake for a gay couple.

The case asks the high court to balance the religious rights of the baker against the couple's right to equal treatment under the law. Similar disputes have popped up across the United States.

The decision to take on the case reflects renewed energy among the court's conservative justices, whose ranks have recently been bolstered by the addition of Justice Neil Gorsuch to the high court.

The court will review a Colorado court decision that found baker Jack Phillips and his Masterpiece Cakeshop discriminated against the gay couple under Colorado law.

Phillips told the Supreme Court he has free speech and religious rights under the First Amendment that should protect him. He said he should not be compelled to bake a cake specifically to honor a same-sex marriage.

Colorado's anti-discrimination law protects people on the basis of their sexual orientation. Charlie Craig and David Mullins filed a complaint against Phillips and his suburban Denver shop after Phillips said he would not create and decorate a cake in honor of their marriage.

Colorado did not permit same-sex couples to marry until 2014. Two years earlier, Craig and Mullin were planning to fly to Massachusetts, where same-sex marriage was legal, and host a reception in Denver upon their return to Colorado. They wanted a cake for the occasion.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,763
113
Supreme Court takes on new clash of gay rights, religion. I believe if Kennedy retires, the Cakeshop wins this case.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is taking on a new clash between gay rights and religion in a case about a wedding cake for a same-sex couple in Colorado.

The justices said Monday they will consider whether a baker who objects to same-sex marriage on religious grounds can refuse to make a wedding cake for a gay couple.

The case asks the high court to balance the religious rights of the baker against the couple's right to equal treatment under the law. Similar disputes have popped up across the United States.

The decision to take on the case reflects renewed energy among the court's conservative justices, whose ranks have recently been bolstered by the addition of Justice Neil Gorsuch to the high court.

The court will review a Colorado court decision that found baker Jack Phillips and his Masterpiece Cakeshop discriminated against the gay couple under Colorado law.

Phillips told the Supreme Court he has free speech and religious rights under the First Amendment that should protect him. He said he should not be compelled to bake a cake specifically to honor a same-sex marriage.

Colorado's anti-discrimination law protects people on the basis of their sexual orientation. Charlie Craig and David Mullins filed a complaint against Phillips and his suburban Denver shop after Phillips said he would not create and decorate a cake in honor of their marriage.

Colorado did not permit same-sex couples to marry until 2014. Two years earlier, Craig and Mullin were planning to fly to Massachusetts, where same-sex marriage was legal, and host a reception in Denver upon their return to Colorado. They wanted a cake for the occasion.
These are the types of cases that's i just roll my frigging eyes at. Like, really? First of all, why turn away business? That's just dumb. Secondly, why force someone to make a cake for you that obviously overtly disapproves of your lifestyle? Both sides have merit unfortunately and neither could be the bigger person. Just dumb.

I don't see how you could legitimately rule either way in this. This is like ranking the hierarchy of liberties. Over a fvcking cake. I hope his store burns down and the gay couple gets an STD for wasting the county's time on this.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
These are the types of cases that's i just roll my frigging eyes at. Like, really? First of all, why turn away business? That's just dumb. Secondly, why force someone to make a cake for you that obviously overtly disapproves of your lifestyle? Both sides have merit unfortunately and neither could be the bigger person. Just dumb.

I don't see how you could legitimately rule either way in this. This is like ranking the hierarchy of liberties. Over a fvcking cake. I hope his store burns down and the gay couple gets an STD for wasting the county's time on this.

SCOTUS would not have taken the case if they did not feel it important, not just for a cake maker but for larger issues that may lie ahead.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,763
113
SCOTUS would not have taken the case if they did not feel it important, not just for a cake maker but for larger issues that may lie ahead.
Should've never went to the lower courts, let alone the higher one. That's all I'm saying.

It's simple, do you Force someone to sacrifice their religious liberty thus violating the 1st amendment in order to secure the liberty against discrimination guaranteed by the 14th. I guess one would have to prove their religious liberty was indeed being violated through scripture.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Should've never went to the lower courts, let alone the higher one. That's all I'm saying.

It's simple, do you Force someone to sacrifice their religious liberty thus violating the 1st amendment in order to secure the liberty against discrimination guaranteed by the 14th. I guess one would have to prove their religious liberty was indeed being violated through scripture.

The cake shop was fined big time money, if I am not mistaken, that is why it went to court. Pretty easy for the couple to find another bakery but they chose litigation.

I think the Hobby Lobby precedent will likely apply here and the cake shop prevail. SCOTUS has ruled the privately held companies don't lose their first amendment rights to operate their business.