Steakonastick said:
wish they would make a rule that if you transfer to a d-1 school you have to sit for two years. That would cut down on over half of the players who wanna leave. just because a new coach comes in or you do not like how your are being used is not a reason to transfer. That is your fault for signing with that team. like the kid who signed to play football at florida, i cant think of his name said you sign with a program not with a coach. And if players are not getting playing time they are more then welcome to go to d-2 schools and play till their heart is content. this way you help the schools who could get screwed by kids leaving with the graduation rate in play to scholarships
It is beyond naive to think a player is signing to play at a school because they love the school and have a devotion to it. That is in the vast minority. Almost always, the player develops a relationship with the STAFF. That doesnt mean if the staff leaves, then all players will automatically leave. But it does mean the player isnt committing to a school, its to the representatives of the school.
Why should coaches be allowed to bounce all around at the drop of a hat from program to program yet the players be forced to sit out a year if they transfer? There is simply no actual justification that explains such an inequality away.
When a coach leaves, it can screw up the program, even more than a player leaving.
And if a coach is hired with a different system, one that doesnt fit current players, why the hell should they be forced to stay there? They didnt commit to that coach, they didnt commit to that system.
Why punish a kid for not wanting to play in a system that is designed to not allow them to play well?
If you are going to force a player to go to D2 or sit out for 2 years because they had a falling out with the staff, or a new staff doesnt fit their play, or they messed up in their commitment choice, then how can you not force a coach to do the same? Where is the equal treatment? After all, BOTH player and coach make or break a program.
Isnt it the coach's fault for agreeing to coach at a certain school when another one has a job opening?