We play 5 Seed LSU at 3:30 pm on SEC Network.
SEC Soccer Tournament Round 3
- Thread starter Dawgg
- Start date
I am not enjoying your updates thus far. More good news for us please
What the 17 is that call? Her foot rolled off the ball. No 17ing way.
Man, what a bullsнit call. They called a penalty on Vega-Peleka and gave her a red card. She hit the 17ing ball first.
Hot Scandinavian scores the PK.
2-0 LSU
We play with 10 the remainder of the game.
17ing horseshit
2-0 LSU
We play with 10 the remainder of the game.
17ing horseshit
This is pretty terrible. And from captain obvious, That questionable red changed a bunch
Knowledgeable soccer posters, please tell me if I should be as pissed off as I am over that call? No way that's a red card, right? And how is that a penalty at all if our girl hit the ball first?
Yes
red card, no intent to injure just a hard soccer player, she it ball first as well, if he wanted to give yellow I wouldn't be as upset, by red was not the case.I didn't see it, but getting to the ball first does not negate a red card. If the play is judged dangerous it doesn't matter who got the ball. Liverpool had a guy red carded either late last year or earlier this year when his foot rolled over the ball and got the opponent studs up. It was endlessly debated, and the pundits and experts were about evenly divided if it was the correct call. They all agreed the Liverpool guy was "unlucky." That sounds like what happened this time.
Ref here, I didn’t see the game so I can’t comment on the exact play. Although every weekend I hear ball first or all ball. The ball first application is a myth and is not identified in the laws of the game. 3 main considerations when identifying the severity of a foul 1) careless = no card, 2) reckless = YC, 3) violent conduct or serious foul play = red. There’s considerations for each foul the ref uses.
Attachments
-
IMG_5768.png
It would have been really easy for this team to give up after the red card, but they’re still fighting.
I don't see how any of those apply. Wasn't careless, wasn't reckless, wasn't violent conduct or a serious foul play. Our girl literally simply tired to block the ball, extended her foot toward the ball, as you'd have to do to defend, the ball scooted under her foot at the same moment, causing our girl's foot to go on top of the ball, then her foot rolled over the ball into the LSU's player's shin.
I keep trying to upload the video of the totally not a red card here, but On3 keeps giving me an unknown “Oops we ran into some problems” error.
Exact same thing happened to a Liverpool player. I've seen that called both ways. Studs up into the shin is considered dangerous play.
So, will this satisfy the sec or will they also be trying to stop us from any tournament participation?
I had to convert it to “WEBM”, but it seems to have uploaded now.
View attachment Not a red card.webm
View attachment Not a red card.webm
Last edited:
We’ll be in the tournament, but Vega-Peleka will miss game one.
Here's the play. I'm even more pissed now because the LSU player had lost possession, then our #8 was first to the ball, THEN the LSU girl put her foot in front of the ball just as our #8 was trying to dribble away. This caused the ball to stop abruptly at the same time our girl had her foot on the ball, which then caused our girl's foot to roll over the top onto the shin.
Only reason it was "studs up" is because the LSU girl put her foot in front of the ball as our girl was dribbling, causing the foot to roll over studs up.
If you go over the top of the ball and go studs first into someone’s shin, that’s going to be a red card most of the time. That is a potential leg breaker if there is enough force.
I have a hard time calling that a red card, but at the same time, I have no understanding what our #8 was trying to do there! Her play and posture on the ball makes no sense to me......but when studs hit shin (controlled our out of control), one becomes open to the red card.
I hate that happened
I hate that happened