Selection Committee and Rutgers news

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,054
17,678
97
Our odds of making it with a Michigan win followed by a blow out loss to Purdue have surely skyrocketed…. Our odds of avoiding play in game with a win have also improved. I’d say we would now be locked in with a win which I didn’t think before.

I think we’ve ALWAYS been locked in with a win
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,054
17,678
97
You may have always thought that but it’s rare that these types of things are considered. I personally had not factored it in when I thought about our odds. So to my own perception that makes it a boost.

It’s rare that a conference issues such a statement at the end of a game, too
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,054
17,678
97
Ok cool. But 99% on here didn't believe that. So now it's been confirmed, we're allowed to be happy about it.

Sure thing. I’m not telling anyone they’re right or wrong…I’m the only one being told I’m “wrong”
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
11,663
10,778
78
its important because its a huge footnote on their team sheet

its like in Survivor when a contestant finds an advantage, does not mean it will help them ultimate goal but its an advantage that its being considered

and no they dont consider controversial calls really so thats why its important

Correct - they almost never take these things into account. I’m not sure how anyone assumed that was a given.

I’m thinking maybe it’s standing out because it’s uniquely different from any other bad call I can think of in the sense that the missed call itself was directly responsible for our defensive breakdown (which wasn’t actually a breakdown since Mag was correct to leave his ineligible man) that then resulted in the basket.

Think about it - in other situations, you are expected to play through a whistle for example. In this case, the whistle wasn’t supposed to blow though just for the player stepping out. But Mag was supposed to assume that player couldn’t receive the ball because that is actually the rule.
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,054
17,678
97
That doesn’t even make sense. You think we are locked in with a win but no chance with a loss? How is one neutral game Vs a bubble team bridging such a gap?

Did I say we have no chance with a loss? Please quote if I did.
 

Perricone7

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2015
1,472
2,067
113
You do no

Are you just stubborn. They issued an apology not because a missed call on the baseline. They issued the apology and statement because it was a clear violation when someone steps outside the court on their own and jumps back in and touches the ball first , and Rutgers would have been awarded the ball up 2 with less than 1 second or with 1 second left . You cannot see but everyone else in the world would declare that a Rutgers win. There is a reason Jay Bilas on GAMEDAY mentioned that for a month and why the BIG 10 network for a month when we we’re in 2nd place saying that game was the difference from us being closer to Purdue. It was hammered home for 2 months. Then when the refs blew the call at the end of Duke / Virginia costing Duke the win , the first thing Bilas said was remember the Rutgers/ Ohio State game.
Things happen and consequences result when something is done wrong. This is an acknowledgement that they have the ability and will likely correct it if it comes down to it.

I don’t know what you’re mad about lol. As expected, it sounds like it is going to be a note added to the resume. That is different than the committee literally changing our record as some were suggesting.
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,054
17,678
97
Mikemarc you act like you don't want us to make it? Geez.

I already took 5 days off from work to attend the first round. I’d be very upset if I have nowhere to go. Lol.

Certainly want us to make it. Think we do with a win. Think we don’t with a loss. Keep in my what I think had absolutely no impact on what will happen
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,054
17,678
97
I already took 5 days off from work to attend the first round. I’d be very upset if I have nowhere to go. Lol.

Certainly want us to make it. Think we do with a win. Think we don’t with a loss. Keep in my what I think had absolutely no impact on what will happen

I also find it easier to deal with disappointment if I expect it. Thinking we have very little chance with a loss….makes it easier if we’re left out. And much more enjoyable if we get chosen.
 

zebnatto

All-Conference
May 7, 2008
5,071
3,818
0
From Breitman’s article: “What that will actually equate to in regard to a decision by the NCAA Tournament Selection Committee on Rutgers’ bid status remains to be seen.”
 
A

anon_xekqhstck0ygt

Guest
I also find it easier to deal with disappointment if I expect it. Thinking we have very little chance with a loss….makes it easier if we’re left out. And much more enjoyable if we get chosen.
I haven't agreed with anything you've said in the thread, BUT this I DEFINITELY agree!
 

RCBeta79

All-Conference
Jun 7, 2013
1,058
1,045
0
That win would also put Rutgers in a 5 or 6 seeding in the Big Ten Tournament.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
238,250
167,967
113
My opinion is its ALWAYS been a footnote. And where Rutgers is currently in the field in the committes eyes and in most bracketologists eyes…..has already taken that into account.

You seem to be saying that this has just suddenly become a footnote…and people should change their brackets due to this. (As you seem to be doing, now giving Rutgers a 50% change of making it with a loss Thursday. It was much lower yesterday)

No it was never going to be considered unless someone actually dictated it to the committee

They didn't decide on their own

I can assure you bracketologists were not taking this into account. Not one mentioned it
 

NewJerseyHawk

Heisman
Jan 11, 2007
23,907
37,583
113
The Michigan game is 1/32nd of the equation.

The Ohio State game is 1/32nd of the equation.

For anyone to say that one game (neutral vs Michigan) outweighs another one (road @ OSU) is illogical in every aspect. The committee does not watch 32 games per team. Especially in early December.

And Brad Watchel getting an agreement from Jerry Carino, is dropping Brad's credibility now 2 years in a row......I get it, clicks and March Madness are important for people, but click-bait stuff saying wild and inaccurate things, doesn't pass the smell test.

It's truly disappointing, I think Brad is actually a RU alum and former basketball manager, unless I am mistaken....but somehow, someway, these phantom items keep popping up every year.

Last year, Brad incorrectly said the NET, the NET, the NET, along with Lafayette as "there's no way".....80-90% of the brackets had RU in and he kept saying it all the way to Selection Sunday.

Strange times indeed I guess.
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,054
17,678
97
No it was never going to be considered unless someone actually dictated it to the committee

They didn't decide on their own

I can assure you bracketologists were not taking this into account. Not one mentioned it

Once again, I just disagree. Agree to disagree on this. I think it’s very silly that you suggest a media member is influencing the committee on what or what not to take into account.
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,054
17,678
97
The Michigan game is 1/32nd of the equation.

The Ohio State game is 1/32nd of the equation.

For anyone to say that one game (neutral vs Michigan) outweighs another one (road @ OSU) is illogical in every aspect. The committee does not watch 32 games per team. Especially in early December.

And Brad Watchel getting an agreement from Jerry Carino, is dropping Brad's credibility now 2 years in a row......I get it, clicks and March Madness are important for people, but click-bait stuff saying wild and inaccurate things, doesn't pass the smell test.

It's truly disappointing, I think Brad is actually a RU alum and former basketball manager, unless I am mistaken....but somehow, someway, these phantom items keep popping up every year.

Last year, Brad incorrectly said the NET, the NET, the NET, along with Lafayette as "there's no way".....80-90% of the brackets had RU in and he kept saying it all the way to Selection Sunday.

Strange times indeed I guess.

Are you suggesting because Brad is an RU alumni he should be biased towards RU?
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
238,250
167,967
113
Once again, I just disagree. Agree to disagree on this. I think it’s very silly that you suggest a media member is influencing the committee on what or what not to take into account.


???

Odd who said

Meanwhile you claimed Aaron talked to the committee..any receipts?
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,054
17,678
97
Hes a troll

Certainly not trolling. Just a different opinion than you. Trolls call out posters personally and that’s what they get a kick out of….im just disagreeing with posters opinions.. all good.

You certainly pride yourself on your bracketology. And I respect your dedication. I just think you’re putting too much stock in this report and how much impact it’s going to have.
 

motorb54

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2005
9,934
4,254
113
Bracketologists have no idea how conference tournament games are going to go. Parts are still moving and could move up until Sunday
Several sources have reported that the field is almost fully set as early as Friday night.
A bid stealer still alive would cause contingencies. And final seeding could have minor shifts due to the outcome of tournament finals. But most of the work is done well before Sunday as only a few teams are still playing after Friday night. And comparing the bubble teams who are done with their season can be finalized, placed is some order. If a bubble team is still playing Saturday and/or Sunday they have played their way in.
 

Mikemarc

Heisman
Nov 28, 2005
69,054
17,678
97