Senate Arms Committee to investigate Hegseth’s illegal order

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

Another weak pathetic false hoax from the commiecrats fails.

 

[PalmettoTiger1]

Also PalmettoTiger1 ...



That's you, responding to tboonpickens posting a video of Trump saying "If Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her."

"Dating" obviously also means banging.

You endorsed him thinking about and stating aloud that he'd be banging her if she weren't his daughter. Then you equated you and Trump ... "like he and I said not with our daughters." Thereby attaching yourself to his sentiment.

Now, a normal person ... someone who isn't sick in the head ... would NEVER talk about the potential for "dating" or banging, or anything romantic or sexual in any way ... with their daughter ... even if it's to say "I would if she WEREN'T my daughter." Because that still implies you thought about it and came to the conclusion you WOULD. You know, if she weren't your daughter.

That's insanity. That's disgusting.

So, did you, like Trump, have thoughts about dating/banging your daughter, assuming she wasn't your daughter?

Get help for your pathetic try at sexually deviant perversion and projection

God helps even sexual deviants

 

[Moogy]

Get help for your pathetic try at sexually deviant perversion and projection

God helps even sexual deviants

Remember, Palmetto … the FBI, SC SWAT, CIA, IRS, SEC, ACC, BIG 10, ASPCA and other organizations are closely monitoring these communications, so they can see what you said. They see you clearly claiming that wanting your daughter to not be your daughter so you can bang her is the “highest compliment.” You can’t lie your way out of this one. You can’t use “I know you are, but what am I?” In this situation, creepy creepster.

 

[baltimorened]

Remember, Palmetto … the FBI, SC SWAT, CIA, IRS, SEC, ACC, BIG 10, ASPCA and other organizations are closely monitoring these communications, so they can see what you said. They see you clearly claiming that wanting your daughter to not be your daughter so you can bang her is the “highest compliment.” You can’t lie your way out of this one. You can’t use “I know you are, but what am I?” In this situation, creepy creepster.

I haven't dated in a while. Does taking a woman on a date now equate to sex? That doesn't seem logical to me unless today's woman has a lot looser morals then when I was young.

 

[Moogy]

I haven't dated in a while. Does taking a woman on a date now equate to sex? That doesn't seem logical to me unless today's woman has a lot looser morals then when I was young.

Taking someone on one date doesn't imply sex is expected on that date. "Dating someone" implies sex will happen, and is an intended result of the situation ... unless you can show me that the parties are waiting until marriage.

So, if it doesn't seem logical to you, then it's because you're weak at setting up valid and sound logical syllogisms.

To restate ... "Do you want to go on a date?" does not carry with it the expectation that, if you accept, sex will happen on that date. However, "I want to date her" = "I want to bang her." This is true in normal dating ... but especially so for someone who pays porn stars for raw-dogged sex, cheats on his pregnant 3rd wife, was adjudged to be a sexual predator, and stalks naked underage girls because they can't do anything to stop him.