That article was obviously written by a Boliever.
That article was obviously written by a Boliever.
It's not like he was punching babies.Pelini wasn't fired because he didn't win enough. He was fired because he was emotionally unstable. Bo's record and lopsided losses could be the same and if he would have kept an even-keel he would still be here.
Of course this article is accurate. It's amazing how the unbiased saw the Pelini firing and Riley hiring.
And don't act like this is hindsight, because if Riley somehow managed to win 9 games in a season, that would be an exceptional performance from him.
Frazier's take would make sense if Riley had even a decent record as a head coach.Its not entirely accurate. Frazier may be one of Riley's most high profile supporters.
Frazier just got done this week talking about "time" and putting more onus on the players to buy in and receive coaching. Using his tweet in the context of the article makes it sound like Frazier is not a fan of the coaches, which is dishonest.
We'll have to see what tone Frazier takes this week.
Frazier's take would make sense if Riley had even a decent record as a head coach.
If that is the case, then go on record and state that you think Riley was a good hire.Yours would make more sense if you had played D1 football at Frazier's level, or had more than 25 posts.
![]()
If that is the case, then go on record and state that you think Riley was a good hire.
And remember to type about 8-9 paragraphs in the process.
Post count has no correlation with logic.
Also, Eichorst didn't play D1 football at Frazier's level, either.
Pelini wasn't fired because he didn't win enough. He was fired because he was emotionally unstable. Bo's record and lopsided losses could be the same and if he would have kept an even-keel he would still be here.
I was fine with the Riley hire from the beginning. banker and read were my questionable points.
If Riley doesn't end up working out so be it. I'm not of the opinion that he deserves to be here regardless of the results, but I do have the opinion that you cast your lot with a coach and a system and a culture, you should give time to evaluate those things.
Time in the eye of the beholder right? Folks of Fraziers background arguing more, folks of ours generally less
Never happen.I'm still good with the Riley hire. He needs to get rid of Banker, Langs, and Reed. Just terrible.
I'm still good with the Riley hire. He needs to get rid of Banker, Langs, and Reed. Just terrible.
I can deal with the current state not to be embarrassed by a MADMAN on the sideline. Things will get better , it just make take a few years.
Lombardi, Belichick, or Devaney couldnt do better with this cesspool of a roster.
No offense, but the above may be one of the stupidest comments I've ever read on this board.
Read is a no brainer. Banker is next with Davis and Langsdorf on the fence.
It's not like he was punching babies.
Isn't the ultimate goal of a college football coach to win football games? People got ticky-tacky with Pelini, wanted him fired because he wasn't a poster child, and we ended up with Riley as a result.
People got so focused on Pelini's abrasive personality that they supported hiring an old, crappy football coach.
Do we want Nebraska's football team to win, or do we want to win a few of those ridiculous online polls of "Nicest Football Coaches in America?"
Its not entirely accurate. Frazier may be one of Riley's most high profile supporters.
Frazier just got done this week talking about "time" and putting more onus on the players to buy in and receive coaching. Using his tweet in the context of the article makes it sound like Frazier is not a fan of the coaches, which is dishonest.
We'll have to see what tone Frazier takes this week.
The challenge I like to see Riley address is packing and moving for the 2nd time in two years.Changes need to be made IMHO with regard to position coaches. We have had good to great coaching from Hughes, Bray, and Williams. They have had to deal with a lot of the injuries and depth issues but have been able to adapt and find players to adequately fill those positions.
Riley needs to deal with the other obvious issues and do what needs to be done. He wanted a new challenge at Nebraska and he has one now and needs to address the problems that have to be obvious to him. Doing nothing will seal his fate if we go through another year like this year. I think that he knows that and will make some necessary changes.
The challenge I like to see Riley address is packing and moving for the 2nd time in two years.
I know I feel like our program has sunk to a new low, and has very little to be excited about beyond this horrific season we're currently experiencing.