thats just it...he's not....move onlars larson said:he was eligible for Kentucky?
boomboommsu said:the NCAA will protect Kentucky, and doesn't care if it's obvious.</p>
windcrysmary said:if he's cleared for the game after KY, then I think it will put us on a big time run... one more strong presence in the paint is about all we need to get back into the mix...
How and why should he be held responsible for the actions of his parents when he was in the 9th grade?Do you think you are responsible for whatever your parents would have done when you were in the 9th grade?Hell, for that matter whywould you be responsible for what your parents did period?DerHntr said:but at the same time i am not feeling sorry for Renardo and his family. everything about this situation stinks to high heaven. if it were an OM player we would all be on here talking about how dirty the guy and his family are and we wouldn't be able to say a damn thing good about jackson (not that we have said much good about jackson at this point either).
i just wish the NCAA would be consistent with the way they treat all players on any team.
No, it's not necessarily fair for Renardo to be punished for something his parents did. But, it can be reasonably inferred that whatever benefit the parents received, it was because of their son's basketball talents and promising future. If you draw a line in between parent and child, then it basically authorizes that children can be bought out by programs/parties of interest via channeling payments through the parent. The NCAA can't publicly condone that type of activity and I'm okay with that if that's their ultimate decision and logic. My problem is with the consistency in which they apply that standard to other potential student athletes. Would Renardo have received this scrutiny had he committed to Kentucky? I'm generally not a conspiracy theorist, but I do find it suspect how somebody like a John Wall can get cleared with nothing more than a slap on the wrist and, most importantly, in a very timely fashion, whereas, it's now the middle of February and we still don't know **** about our guy. That's just ********.How and why should he be held responsible for the actions of his
parents when he was in the 9th grade?Do you think you are responsible
for whatever your parents would have done when you were in the 9th
grade?Hell, for that matter whywould you be responsible for what your
parents did period?
ckDOG said:No, it's not necessarily fair for Renardo to be punished for something his parents did. But, it can be reasonably inferred that whatever benefit the parents received, it was because of their son's basketball talents and promising future. If you draw a line in between parent and child, then it basically authorizes that children can be bought out by programs/parties of interest via channeling payments through the parent. The NCAA can't publicly condone that type of activity and I'm okay with that if that's their ultimate decision and logic. My problem is with the consistency in which they apply that standard to other potential student athletes. Would Renardo have received this scrutiny had he committed to Kentucky? I'm generally not a conspiracy theorist, but I do find it suspect how somebody like a John Wall can get cleared with nothing more than a slap on the wrist and, most importantly, in a very timely fashion, whereas, it's now the middle of February and we still don't know **** about our guy. That's just ********.How and why should he be held responsible for the actions of his parents when he was in the 9th grade?Do you think you are responsible for whatever your parents would have done when you were in the 9th grade?Hell, for that matter whywould you be responsible for what your parents did period?
and don't go on about he won't mesh with the team. Are you saying Kodi meshes with the team? Dee has to direct him around the court puppet-master style and gets obviously frustrated when Kodi starts shooting (and missing) 3's. Any one who scores points and actually plays offense down low is going to mesh with the team.Gene Swindoll said:boomboommsu said:the NCAA will protect Kentucky, and doesn't care if it's obvious.</p>
if he was cleared today, he would in no way be a factor inthat game....mabee a liability....he hasnt even been practicing with the team