just a fyi, virginia also touches tenn. and VT is located in the SW part of the state, closer to tennessee than to the east coast/DC metro/MD parts of the state.MeridianDog said:
Since rumors are encouraged....
- Thread starter gtowndawg
- Start date
each other I can assure you.... neither fan base cares much for that game... even when vandy is playing better than normal and UT is sucking, UT still stomps their ***.... when played in nashville, over 1/2 are UT fans there...
if there was ever a in state rivalry that wasn't a rivalry, it's vandy and UT...
this would make the most sense georgraphically and keep rivalries in tact....
if there was ever a in state rivalry that wasn't a rivalry, it's vandy and UT...
this would make the most sense georgraphically and keep rivalries in tact....
because it would skew the competitive balance factor so much, it would override any geographic sense. and realistically, travel-wise, it wouldn't even make that much of a difference in travel distance for mizzou (assuming mizzou's cross-divisional rival would be arkansas). <div>
</div><div>5 of the conferences biggest 6 programs would be in the east. a&m has the resources to make it a big 7, but they aren't there right now.</div><div>
</div><div>lsu fans might as well buy condos in downtown atl if vandy moved west and bama/aub moved east. thankfully the sec office isn't that stupid.</div>
</div><div>5 of the conferences biggest 6 programs would be in the east. a&m has the resources to make it a big 7, but they aren't there right now.</div><div>
</div><div>lsu fans might as well buy condos in downtown atl if vandy moved west and bama/aub moved east. thankfully the sec office isn't that stupid.</div>