flag football now?
with the ball is a defenceless player? What are you supposed to do, let him score?
Did not "launch". The defender never left his feet. Looked like a hard shoulder to chest hit to me.
i almost didnt respond to the first post. in retrospect i now wish i hadnt. i forgot for just a moment how big of a dumbass you are
How can you be a AC/DC fan and not enjoy "thunder"...
A dumbass because I don't like a rule that is taking away some of the essence of the game? Football is (or was) and always has been a violent game. If you try to take the injuries out of the game then it's not the same game. A man catching or running with the ball in the open field is NOT a defenceless player. He is playing the game and is a legitimate target for contact, of any kind.
Complaining about rules is how they get changed. Softies and anti-real football people like you complaining about hard hits is how that rule got put in. **
I don't understand this "defenseless" you and the NCAA speak of. Last time I checked, all players wear protective equipment that is rigorously tested for safety and comfort. If you don't want to get blown up by an SEC safety don't run a route up the middle of the field. Or better yet, don't play in the SEC. I feel like as we, the fans are giving an inch, they, the NCAA will take a mile in the next couple of years. It wouldn't surprise me if they made a rule where you couldn't lead with your shoulder pads.
Well boyo, the rule I'm complaining about was put in because people were complaining about hits like that one. That's how most laws and rules originate. Give it up on this line man. Argue about why you like the rule or something.
Well, they moved the kickoffs back to the 35 this year. That repealed the move to the 30. You DO realize how stupid that arguement is don't you? It's the EXACT same process as instituting one.
Oh, so you ARE one of THOSE people. Quit ruining football.
Well, you do seem to be defending it. Yes or no: Is it a good rule?