So we're ranked #32 in recruiting so far

Indndawg

Senior
Nov 16, 2005
7,022
549
113
Hud U=#88

Petrino's WKU=#100 or dead last in the survey.

Something to think about
 

57stratdawg

Heisman
Dec 1, 2004
148,408
24,182
113
It's tough for smaller schools to pickup early commits, because prospects tend to hold out for better offers. I type that realizing Hud has 18 prospects committed, but I think by and large that statement stands true.
 

Indndawg

Senior
Nov 16, 2005
7,022
549
113
You're right, but I was comparing to the remainder of the US

Sorry, but 32nd is not "okay." It's freaking awful when compared to the rest of the SEC.

w/my "OK" statement. Sorry I left off the caveat.

But w/mighty UK and Vandy and esp Mississippi crushing MSU in recruiting thus far......we should be concerned.
 

myusernamesucks

Redshirt
Mar 5, 2009
1,173
0
0
UK beat us for a defensive player last year, and has a big time QB committed for 2014. Meanwhile, we sit around twiddling our freaking thumbs as the talent gap continues to grow.
 
Last edited:

CadaverDawg

Redshirt
Dec 5, 2011
6,409
0
0
w/my "OK" statement. Sorry I left off the caveat.

But w/mighty UK and Vandy and esp Mississippi crushing MSU in recruiting thus far......we should be concerned.

Those of us that don't see things as "yay we beat Bowling Green by one!!!1!!1, a win is a win!!11!!"....get it. And you make a great point. If you know football and are watching the product our coach is putting on the field right now.....you can see that the writing is on the wall.

Supposedly the team has had a chip on their shoulder this week in practice, so hopefully we can turn this **** around starting this weekend.
 

UIUCDog

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
711
0
0
Supposedly the team has had a chip on their shoulder this week in practice

Color me skeptical. Seems like if this team and coaching staff had any nuts they’d have gotten a chip on their shoulder maybe about a year ago.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
which is OK, but looking at 2 bottom-feeder schools outranking us now...is a troubling. I hope this "extension" gets Dan hot on the recruiting trail

http://247sports.com/Season/2014-Football/CompositeTeamRankings

If you want to get even more concerned, look at scheduled visits.



Meanwhile, up the road.
OM COMPLETED OVs:


The results on the field are only half the reason some of us are seeing huge red flags with Mullen. This is year 5 -- and we still don't have any perception of recruiting hard.
 

HD6

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
10,019
108
63
Did you think this was a game we could win back in August?
 

Indndawg

Senior
Nov 16, 2005
7,022
549
113
Its just hard to fathom Vandy and UK out recruiting us

in football.

Basketball? Yes

I think the "extension" maybe a last-ditch effort to salvage some recruits rather than we want Dan for another umpteen years.

Looking like the shine's off Mullen's bloom
 

UIUCDog

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
711
0
0
Wow. I guess our staff has already knocked off for the year while Freeze looks forward to annihilating them a second straight time. Are we even trying at this point? I mean my impression looking at this is that our coaches are working about as hard at recruiting as our players are playing in the games, particularly in 2nd halves...not very.
 
Last edited:

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
What? No upcoming visits? Is there a good way to spin this?

No.

The sanctions are the reason we didn't have visits for LSU and Kentucky. That doesn't explain why we had no one for Alcorn and Troy.

The point is that we have NOTHING on the books WHILE we are getting our clocks cleaned by OM in recruiting... Feeds the perception that Mullen has quit -- or at very least is on cruise control. They've had 10 4 and 5* visitors already...
 
Last edited:

CadaverDawg

Redshirt
Dec 5, 2011
6,409
0
0
Did you think this was a game we could win back in August?

I think this type of comment is incredibly dumb.

For instance, since Kentucky is recruiting better than us, as is Ole miss, and even Arkansas and Vandy....does that mean next year and the next when they are all favored over us that we should expect to lose since it's not a game "we're expected to win"?

I guess at some point when everyone in the SEC passes us by, the excuses will either run out, or people like you will be saying "guys, we weren't favored in a single SEC game, so we won the 4 games we were supposed to win against the SWAC....no other Coach in our history has won all of the games he's supposed to win like Mullen!!!1!"

Where does the "he is beating who he's supposed to beat" **** stop? At what point is he supposed to beat some better teams in this league? I've never seen a fan base with such ****** expectations in my life.

im not thinking we'll win a championship, but I'm expecting us to beat and out recruit Kentucky and Vandy every year, and Arkansas most years. And I'm expecting us to not have to go into every season and already know which games we will win. It's clear now....if they have a pulse, we lose. If they suck...we win, but it may be a nail biter. That's high expectations there*
 
Last edited:

stinkfoot

Redshirt
Aug 23, 2012
327
0
0
How many spots are left? I'm not sure hosting recruits vs. Alcorn and BG is a..

good idea. I would want them on campus when there will be some atmosphere. Mizzou is currently 40 and they never seem to have highly ranked classes. I think they are the new poster boy for "recruiting results don't matter (when your coach can identify the players that fit his system and develop them)" mantra. I see UK's recruiting being a flash in the pan type thing. I doubt they continue the momentum w/out some wins.
 

57stratdawg

Heisman
Dec 1, 2004
148,408
24,182
113
It's a big problem. 2015 isn't shaping up very well for us either. I understand there is along way to go, but we're on the outside looking in with a number of guys at this point. We were saying that about the 2014 class as well, and we never were really in the running for several top players instate this year (Rod Taylor, Speeks, CJ Hampton, Pack, Voohries)
 

cheewgumm

Redshirt
Sep 15, 2012
792
0
0
Know your role. Everyone knows we don't win these type games, so just wait until

Jackson State comes back to town. IF we lose to them, you can care,. Until then, sit back and enjoy the beatings, because we aren't supposed to win.

In fact, don't even watch, or go to the game. There is no point. We are going to lose and if you get upset because we lose to a team you thought beforehand we'd lose to anyway, then obivously you set your expecations too high. You should be going to our games, expecting a loss, so you are not disappointed. If you are expecting to win, or even expect us to compete, then haha, sorry dude, you're jsut unrealistic.

Hell no. Are you kidding me?
 

CadaverDawg

Redshirt
Dec 5, 2011
6,409
0
0
Jackson State comes back to town. IF we lose to them, you can care,. Until then, sit back and enjoy the beatings, because we aren't supposed to win.

In fact, don't even watch, or go to the game. There is no point. We are going to lose and if you get upset because we lose to a team you thought beforehand we'd lose to anyway, then obivously you set your expecations too high. You should be going to our games, expecting a loss, so you are not disappointed. If you are expecting to win, or even expect us to compete, then haha, sorry dude, you're jsut unrealistic.

+100
 

cheewgumm

Redshirt
Sep 15, 2012
792
0
0
Come on dude...this is Miss State, not Alabama. Obviously, you need to be a Bama fan, not a State fan.

The funny thing is HD6 is making this cae, yet he's probably the one person on the board who depends the most on people caring about the game. BSR, sixpack, etc...

What are they going to do when they talk everyone into not caring and people start to ...GASP...not care?


I think this type of comment is incredibly dumb.

For instance, since Kentucky is recruiting better than us, as is Ole miss, and even Arkansas and Vandy....does that mean next year and the next when they are all favored over us that we should expect to lose since it's not a game "we're expected to win"?

I guess at some point when everyone in the SEC passes us by, the excuses will either run out, or people like you will be saying "guys, we weren't favored in a single SEC game, so we won the 4 games we were supposed to win against the SWAC....no other Coach in our history has won all of the games he's supposed to win like Mullen!!!1!"

Where does the "he is beating who he's supposed to beat" **** stop? At what point is he supposed to beat some better teams in this league? I've never seen a fan base with such ****** expectations in my life.

im not thinking we'll win a championship, but I'm expecting us to beat and out recruit Kentucky and Vandy every year, and Arkansas most years. And I'm expecting us to not have to go into every season and already know which games we will win. It's clear now....if they have a pulse, we lose. If they suck...we win, but it may be a nail biter. That's high expectations there*
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,555
20,547
113
And when Jesus Hudspeth comes and the same thing more than likely happens again what do you say then?

State is never going to be a contender for championships, not with the way the SEC West is right now. Theres the chance for some 8 or 9 win seasons mixed in with 5 and 6 win seasons. Is it frustrating how they have played at times this year and how Mullen has been? Absolutely no question about it but I think it's going to be the same problem with every coach hire at State.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
good idea. I would want them on campus when there will be some atmosphere. Mizzou is currently 40 and they never seem to have highly ranked classes. I think they are the new poster boy for "recruiting results don't matter (when your coach can identify the players that fit his system and develop them)" mantra. I see UK's recruiting being a flash in the pan type thing. I doubt they continue the momentum w/out some wins.

When you can't host them for the first two SEC games -- compromises have to be made.

Otherwise, I guess, you could just not host them at all. Bama is the ONLY logical SEC game for OVs for us...
 

kired

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2008
7,016
2,327
113
If you're concerned now, just wait till February. Our ranking will only go down. This class is basically full. I can't see us signing more than 20 players... we don't have the scholarships available. Other schools will pass us as they fill up their class.

The only way it gets any better is if some of our guys get bumped up a star after the season is over.

The good news is we shouldn't have any immediate needs next year. We've got our QB for the future, tons of RBs, WRs, LBs, DBs, DL. Shouldn't be hard to replace Siddoway and hopefully we've found another guard in Clayborn to go with Malone. I just hate the fact that it appears we've got a few very average recruits in a year when we didn't have many spots open. You'd think we'd have been more selective and targeted a few big names.
 

cheewgumm

Redshirt
Sep 15, 2012
792
0
0
So, then the logical conclusion. So, we're never firing Mullen...ever? Right?

so, instead of trying to compete...you just chalk it up to "we can't compete" and basically give up?

Why are we in the SEC? Why should our fans go to the games then? I'm serious. If this is a fact, we shouldn't go. Spend your life on something else. Just wait for that 5th year when we may be decent.

And when Jesus Hudspeth comes and the same thing more than likely happens again what do you say then?

State is never going to be a contender for championships, not with the way the SEC West is right now. Theres the chance for some 8 or 9 win seasons mixed in with 5 and 6 win seasons. Is it frustrating how they have played at times this year and how Mullen has been? Absolutely no question about it but I think it's going to be the same problem with every coach hire at State.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
And when Jesus Hudspeth comes and the same thing more than likely happens again what do you say then?
What are you going to say when he comes in and immediately picks up and flips a handful of 4 and 5* talent that isn't giving us a chance right now because they hate Mullen?

State is never going to be a contender for championships, not with the way the SEC West is right now. Theres the chance for some 8 or 9 win seasons mixed in with 5 and 6 win seasons. Is it frustrating how they have played at times this year and how Mullen has been? Absolutely no question about it but I think it's going to be the same problem with every coach hire at State.

Who the 17 is talking about contending for championships?

Why should we NOT be able to compete with Ole Miss? Right now, we aren't. On and off the field.
 

00Dawg

Senior
Nov 10, 2009
3,218
514
93
Looking back at last year, we only had 10 official visits showing in the 24/7 tracker during the regular season. My guess is either our staff likes to save more OV's for late (28 of our 38 after 12/1 in 2012) , or our OV's aren't updated on 24/7.
 

CadaverDawg

Redshirt
Dec 5, 2011
6,409
0
0
And when Jesus Hudspeth comes and the same thing more than likely happens again what do you say then?

State is never going to be a contender for championships, not with the way the SEC West is right now. Theres the chance for some 8 or 9 win seasons mixed in with 5 and 6 win seasons. Is it frustrating how they have played at times this year and how Mullen has been? Absolutely no question about it but I think it's going to be the same problem with every coach hire at State.

I can say at least we 17ing tried to win, instead of being pussies that are okay with beat 4 SWAC teams every year because we are poor lil ole State.

Seriously though, would it be that hard for Hudspeth to at least match Mullen? Beat the cupcakes and lose to EVERYONE that is equal or better? And even if he can't, like I said, are you content with not ever trying, and continuing to be passed by teams like Vandy, Arkansas, Kentucky, Ole miss, etc?

Even those sure fire wins are getting a little closer this year. If Market doesn't make a big play against UK, we lose. If BG makes a catch that hits them in the chest, we lose. Next year, UK will have more talent and will likely break that tackle. Think about it
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,555
20,547
113
The championship part was agreeing with cadaver.

Mullen can do way better than the effort he's putting out now on the field and on recruiting. At this point if he were to leave or be terminated at the end of the year I would not be upset at all. I just don't get the feeling that we can be any better consistantly with another coach.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
Looking back at last year, we only had 10 official visits showing in the 24/7 tracker during the regular season. My guess is either our staff likes to save more OV's for late (28 of our 38 after 12/1 in 2012) , or our OV's aren't updated on 24/7.

This is per Gene's...which shows us with one visit scheduled after signing day...

 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
The championship part was agreeing with cadaver.

Mullen can do way better than the effort he's putting out now on the field and on recruiting. At this point if he were to leave or be terminated at the end of the year I would not be upset at all. I just don't get the feeling that we can be any better consistantly with another coach.

It seems to me that the rock is rolling downhill with Mullen -- and once it starts, it's extremely hard to stop it.

I just don't agree that this is the best we can be. I think right now that if Mullen was still the same coach he was in years 1 and 2, we win 10 last year, likely win one of the OK State/Auburn games, end up with a very close loss against LSU, and are in the others receiving votes category for being ranked right now. It might not translate to the win column much differently, but relentless effort by itself is worth making a change IMO unless Mullen somehow finds it.

There will be hope and optimism there every time there is change -- and those two things sell the hell out of some tickets. That's the bigger reason I can't see us taking our sweet time with this situation like we have in the past.

My hope isn't so much that Hudspeth is night and day better than Mullen as an on-field coach that's going to actually take us to championships. It's that he's a better motivator that'll never quit on a school that he loves and much, much better recruiter, which I believe probably is enough to raise our ceiling 1-1.5 wins.
 
Last edited:

HD6

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
10,019
108
63
I'm not saying don't care. I'm saying we aren't doing anything most people didn't predict us to anyway. I said struggle to get to 6-6, guess what, that's where we are. I'm not trying to pat myself on the back here, but my gosh, if that was your prediction (Cadaver), then why are you upset when it comes true?

I agree the recruiting stuff is troublesome, but again, the company line was that we do a great job of player evaluation and we aren't that concerned with recruiting stars. Why did that change all of a sudden?
 

UIUCDog

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
711
0
0
Honestly?

B/c we’re happy with that party line on recruiting only so long as our classes are at least in the same universe as Ole Miss’s.
 

MaronMatters

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
603
0
0
Where does the "he is beating who he's supposed to beat" **** stop? At what point is he supposed to beat some better teams in this league? I've never seen a fan base with such ****** expectations in my life.

Plus all of the "Just look at our history and compare that to what Mullen has done!1!!!!!11! It's INCREDIBLE!!!111!!1!" ******** is driving me nuts. It's like our fans aren't supposed to expect and want better. There's no legitimate excuse for KY out-recruiting us, or for Vandy and OM out-recruiting us and having better teams that look like they give a damn - other than Mullen and his staff just aren't worth a greased turd.

And to top all of that off, I'm concerned that our athletic department really has no clue how to handle these problems.
 

HD6

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
10,019
108
63
You and yours created that party line, you should have set some qualifiers.