So we're ranked #32 in recruiting so far

121Josey

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2012
7,503
0
0
Kinda getting tired of your ********. You have zero evidence that Hud is going to come in and flip anything. You are constantly speaking of his contacts and all that, but unless you've got a time machine made from a Delorian, or a functioning crystal ball, you don't know **** about ****.

I'm anxiously awaiting your 12 paragraph response. Flame away.

You mad, bra?**
 

Arloguthrie

Redshirt
Nov 3, 2012
880
0
0
Oxymoron - Calling out "English" aptitude while failing to be cognizant of the fact that "READING" aptitude is what's actually applicable. I only made a 28 on that one.

You might have scored higher if you had a basic grasp of the concept of oxymorons.
 

121Josey

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2012
7,503
0
0
If we go around firing coaches with winning records, who would take the job?
Here's how that conversation would go.


Otherwise - facilities, revenue, in-house talent, and opportunity to prove something would be the biggest draws.
 

Lettucexxxx

All-Conference
Oct 16, 2012
4,562
1,047
113
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
You might have scored higher if you had a basic grasp of the concept of oxymorons.

Probably so. It's definitely not the correct term. What's the word I am actually looking for there?

Thanks for the helpful reading.

You should probably just make an RSS feed of my various message board posts around the web at the top of nafoom -- It would make it far simpler for you guys to keep track with your obsession over everything I type on 4 different message boards...

Or maybe you've already got that knocked out over in the IPF***
 
Last edited:

121Josey

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2012
7,503
0
0
I think Dan Mullen and Les Koenning are good coaches of the spread option. They are very experienced at that offense and they are not good at doing pro style. If that is the offense that you like, they are good coaches of it. But they are not miracle workers. Mullen makes some bad decisions like all coaches (especially on fourth down), but he on field coaching is not his downfall. He is just not a good enough recruiter. You do have to be an excellent talent evaluator as well but I don't see that either looking at our current NFL talent.

The better coaches adapt: in-game, in-season, and annually. These are Mullen's three strikes.
 

Drebin

Heisman
Aug 22, 2012
21,506
25,065
113
You should stick to baseball. You're way out of your league everywhere else. And you should be on a word limit in your posts.
 

DirtyDog

Redshirt
Aug 24, 2012
520
14
18
Visits

No.

The sanctions are the reason we didn't have visits for LSU and Kentucky. That doesn't explain why we had no one for Alcorn and Troy.

The point is that we have NOTHING on the books WHILE we are getting our clocks cleaned by OM in recruiting... Feeds the perception that Mullen has quit -- or at very least is on cruise control. They've had 10 4 and 5* visitors already...

We did have some visit for Alcorn. I talked to two 2014 recruits from the Birmingham area on the way into the stadium. They were asking where the M Club was to meet their representative. One was a LB named Ty Ware but don't remember the others name.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
We did have some visit for Alcorn. I talked to two 2014 recruits from the Birmingham area on the way into the stadium. They were asking where the M Club was to meet their representative. One was a LB named Ty Ware but don't remember the others name.

I didn't say we haven't had visitors on campus. We have had a few.

Just no paid official visits. And none on the books. It bothers me that we've got glaring weaknesses upcoming at FS and OL -- and we're not trying to woo any elite JUCOs to fill those slots. It's almost like Mullen got two serviceable JUCO linemen in the boat and basically checked that off the list. Recruiting is never ending.