Your line that jumps out to me is:“Anywhere that I feel it can be used for God’s purposes.” And then immediately follows it with a list of explicitly “Christian” or faith branded organizations.
The unspoken but loud implication is- Only these kinds of places qualify as doing “God’s purposes.” It quietly excludes the waiter we’ve been talking about, the atheist neighbor, the random stranger, from being a legitimate place where God’s purposes can be served with money. It’s still sacred checklist- just with more checkboxes now- not just one church, but several “approved” outlets. It’s actually no different than Horshack (I don’t know why you called his thoughts garbage). It’s the same system just packaged differently- that the money or “giving” or “tithing” only “counts” when it goes through an approved religious filter. It’s the same manipulative system repackaged. What I’m saying in other words, is the “I already gave to God today” mindset, or I already gave up a lot of my hard earned money today and I need every dollar, shows up specifically at restaurants, NOT when donating to ministries that an evangelical personally endorses.
Also, your entire post is just made up of personal “drivel you invented” and then you tried to assign it to an entire group of people. Other words, your personal giving habits and lack of resentment doesn’t disprove a widespread, decades old restaurant industry observation. And it doesn’t represent the majority of what’s going on in the majority or average evangelical mind. Servers have been saying the same thing since the 90s objectively speaking about the church crowd. I was a server for a long time so I too agree with what they’re saying on that end. Critiquing manipulative tithing or giving, and bad theology, and the resentment it creates, along with the effects of tipping, is not hating evangelicals.