Sounds like Taylor planning to be back next fall.

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
19,359
16,369
113
Any good will this staff built up the first 9 games they threw away with the last three. They just looked as bad as last season. Horrible game planning and in game X's and O's. Horrible.
 

shep9332

Junior
Jun 5, 2014
134
322
63
Pay Me GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: OopsICroomedmypants

bulldoghair

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2013
2,445
1,929
108
Well they better go buy some offenses lineman.

Lenny better spend on OL. Taylor taking 30 sacks won’t work.
Lebby will have to pay a “tempo tax” on recruiting, forcing them to overpay for linemen that are scared off by the injury roulette and draft-stock risk. Veteran OLs (4th–6th-year guys with 30+ starts) see the film: 19 missed starts (SEC-high), +190-220 extra explosive reps vs. slower peers like Vandy for comparison (Healthiest OL in SEC). Result? MSU’s NIL collective shells out 25–40% premiums. Agents cite “rep math”- Why add 200 reps when Vandy pays less for clean film?

Then we will need 9-10 quality guys for a rotation to withstand and maintain Lebby’s extreme tempo.
 

Irondawg

Senior
Dec 2, 2007
2,894
553
113
We have to spend money on DL.....We probably still had the worst Dline in the SEC by a decent amount.
 

AT4 Dawg

Senior
Sep 18, 2012
465
603
93
Lebby will have to pay a “tempo tax” on recruiting, forcing them to overpay for linemen that are scared off by the injury roulette and draft-stock risk. Veteran OLs (4th–6th-year guys with 30+ starts) see the film: 19 missed starts (SEC-high), +190-220 extra explosive reps vs. slower peers like Vandy for comparison (Healthiest OL in SEC). Result? MSU’s NIL collective shells out 25–40% premiums. Agents cite “rep math”- Why add 200 reps when Vandy pays less for clean film?

Then we will need 9-10 quality guys for a rotation to withstand and maintain Lebby’s extreme tempo.
How do Ole Miss and UT deal with it? No flame-I mean that. This is good information. I understand the logic of wear and tear being riskier, but we’re not the only ones who run tempo. So is there literally no other option than to pay the premium ?
 

leeinator

All-Conference
Feb 24, 2014
2,131
1,575
113
This was the first game I got to see Taylor show all his wares. Have to say he has a lot of upside. Even Kiffin looked a little miffed at how well he played at times.
 

bulldoghair

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2013
2,445
1,929
108
How do Ole Miss and UT deal with it? No flame-I mean that. This is good information. I understand the logic of wear and tear being riskier, but we’re not the only ones who run tempo. So is there literally no other option than to pay the premium ?

Yes, no other option. Lebby’s offense will have to pay much higher premiums for Linemen (on both sides of the ball). Both Ole Miss and Tennessee do sustain and balance—longer drives—Ole Miss 32:12 TOP/game, (#12 nationally); Tennessee 30:45, (#25 nationally) mean fewer returns, dropping defensive snaps to 72.5 (#28 nationally) for Ole Miss and 69.3 (#7 SEC) for Tennessee. Result: Minimal drift (Ole Miss +3% 4th-Q D efficiency; Tennessee +1%), vs. MSU’s -18% plunge. OL/rotation- both Ole Miss and Tennessee (7-9); State (5-7). Also both Ole Miss and Tennessee actually move the chains. They have a real run games. They mix tempo with huddle. They finish drives. And again, they rotate bodies. Same philosophical tree, totally different pruning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gtowndawg

gtowndawg

Senior
Jan 23, 2007
2,225
604
113
Lebby will have to pay a “tempo tax” on recruiting, forcing them to overpay for linemen that are scared off by the injury roulette and draft-stock risk. Veteran OLs (4th–6th-year guys with 30+ starts) see the film: 19 missed starts (SEC-high), +190-220 extra explosive reps vs. slower peers like Vandy for comparison (Healthiest OL in SEC). Result? MSU’s NIL collective shells out 25–40% premiums. Agents cite “rep math”- Why add 200 reps when Vandy pays less for clean film?

Then we will need 9-10 quality guys for a rotation to withstand and maintain Lebby’s extreme tempo.
Interesting. So yet again, our inability to get quality lineman comes back to the head coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bulldoghair

BoDawg.sixpack

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2010
5,379
2,851
113
Well they better go buy some offenses lineman.
They're offensive alright...
Yes, no other option. Lebby’s offense will have to pay much higher premiums for Linemen (on both sides of the ball). Both Ole Miss and Tennessee do sustain and balance—longer drives—Ole Miss 32:12 TOP/game, (#12 nationally); Tennessee 30:45, (#25 nationally) mean fewer returns, dropping defensive snaps to 72.5 (#28 nationally) for Ole Miss and 69.3 (#7 SEC) for Tennessee. Result: Minimal drift (Ole Miss +3% 4th-Q D efficiency; Tennessee +1%), vs. MSU’s -18% plunge. OL/rotation- both Ole Miss and Tennessee (7-9); State (5-7). Also both Ole Miss and Tennessee actually move the chains. They have a real run games. They mix tempo with huddle. They finish drives. And again, they rotate bodies. Same philosophical tree, totally different pruning.
The portal musical chairs is going to create numerous opportunities to upgrade both lines. We don't have to get 5 star players. Just getting a mid-range 3 star DT and DE is going to be an upgrade. If Lebby can't close the deal with 4 defensive linemen and 4 offensive lineman who can start the day they unload their stuff then his *** needs to be gone before 2026 rolls around.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GloryDawg