Using your moronic reasoning, if some booster withheld money at the end of Stans tenure because they wanted a coaching change, they would be putting their hatred of Stans above the program, right?
I also have never heard Stansbury say one bad word about Rick Ray. He took the deal presented to him and it is what it is. I know I still contribute and yes I didn't go to the SEC tourney this year for the first time in 10 years, but I think it is quite obvious we won't win it. I find it amusing that the folks who blasted Stans' so-called mediocrity like coach 34 give very little , if anything to the program. I find it appalling to say folks like me supported a coach more than MSU. That is more of folks saying what they want other folks to hear than being accurate. If I didn't love MSU I certainly wouldn't have talked repeatedly to Johnathan Holder's family and Myles Gentry's family about why MSU was the best place for them. I have never talked to Rick Ray, have never been approached by him or anybody on his staff to help them. Does that make me bad? I think if Rick Ray is to succeed he will have to do the same thing Stansbury did, and that is build relationships with fans, alumni, and high school coaches. All these accusations about Stans undermining the program is ********. He has simply stayed out of sight for the benefit of the new coach. Some of you are so sick you just can't leave this alone. Rick Ray will succeed if Rick Ray recruits, coaches, and wins. It is that simple, but I will await to see if this board judges him the same way they did Stans. He has already won more than I thought he could this year so I have to give him a thumbs up but one season doesn't make a coach one way or another as 4 years from now we ought to know if Scott made the right choice.
"at the urging of Rick Stansbury"
That is the part I was looking at in Engie's post. I don't know how else to interpret that. I know that there are some who don't like the hire and aren't giving what they used to, but that is a completely thing from doing so "at the urging of Rick Stansbury."
Nobody expected Stansbury to actively help with anything. All we ever asked was that he not actively try to interfere with the program.
I agree with Faust on this one. It would have been awkward.
No way Dawgbreeze wrote this. Almost everything is spelled right and in complete sentences.
It's not Ray's fault that Stans is not the coach anymore. It's just ****** not to even make one phone call.
That's just a common courtesy..
The refusal to help at all -- and the badmouthing behind the scenes to people that trust him and put him on a higher pedestal than our program overall -- defines what I'm talking about. He doesn't have to tell them "don't give money to MSU" -- he just has to talk down the program and administration to accomplish the same basic goal -- exactly like Ron Polk did.
His actions either help or hurt our program period -- there is no in between -- What has he done to help? Meanwhile we're doing him a favor and allowing him to stay 2 more years and get his full MS pension for insane money.
"Nothing vague about it. It's well-known and widespread. What do you want him to give you? A list of megaboosters that are withholding support from the basketball program at the urging of Rick Stansbury..."
Stans whipped his *** or stole Meo from him, back in the day.
Cowardly post.
In the same vein makin stuff up about yo mamma and posting on the interweb without proof. Post the evidence or shut up. New low
That is the price of doing business and you can't blame the outgoing coach for it because its not his job to raise money from these people anymore.
So, what are we paying him to do right now at MSU?
You can't really expect anyone to start naming boosters on here that have withheld money. That's ridiculous. These are the people that MSU will rely on going forward just like we have in the past -- you don't intentionally burn those bridges any worse than they already are.
This is almost as ridiculous as claiming that Stans ran a completely clean program and using the fact that no one will name heppers as evidence...
You are full of factual ******** too fish because you have no clue if Ray has called Stans and if so, how many times. I don't think he has called him at all because he has gone out of his way to distance himself from Stans. That is his perogative, but quit posting crap you have no source to validate it.
Absolutely. If you are going to make that charge, you should be prepared to name names. Tell me who these boosters are that are withholding money directly at the request of Rick Stansbury.
I thought that would be Chapter 2.
If I put an end to repetitive ******** on this board, what you post about?
He's being paid to get "retired." You don't really think Strickland wants him around the donors, do you?