Stans/Ray thread, my take

MadDawg.sixpack

Redshirt
May 22, 2006
3,358
0
0
Using your moronic reasoning, if some booster withheld money at the end of Stans tenure because they wanted a coaching change, they would be putting their hatred of Stans above the program, right?
 

DawgatAuburn

All-Conference
Apr 25, 2006
10,998
1,846
113
I also have never heard Stansbury say one bad word about Rick Ray. He took the deal presented to him and it is what it is. I know I still contribute and yes I didn't go to the SEC tourney this year for the first time in 10 years, but I think it is quite obvious we won't win it. I find it amusing that the folks who blasted Stans' so-called mediocrity like coach 34 give very little , if anything to the program. I find it appalling to say folks like me supported a coach more than MSU. That is more of folks saying what they want other folks to hear than being accurate. If I didn't love MSU I certainly wouldn't have talked repeatedly to Johnathan Holder's family and Myles Gentry's family about why MSU was the best place for them. I have never talked to Rick Ray, have never been approached by him or anybody on his staff to help them. Does that make me bad? I think if Rick Ray is to succeed he will have to do the same thing Stansbury did, and that is build relationships with fans, alumni, and high school coaches. All these accusations about Stans undermining the program is ********. He has simply stayed out of sight for the benefit of the new coach. Some of you are so sick you just can't leave this alone. Rick Ray will succeed if Rick Ray recruits, coaches, and wins. It is that simple, but I will await to see if this board judges him the same way they did Stans. He has already won more than I thought he could this year so I have to give him a thumbs up but one season doesn't make a coach one way or another as 4 years from now we ought to know if Scott made the right choice.

No way Dawgbreeze wrote this. Almost everything is spelled right and in complete sentences.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,494
25,723
113
Nobody expected Stansbury to actively help with anything. All we ever asked was that he not actively try to interfere with the program.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
"at the urging of Rick Stansbury"

That is the part I was looking at in Engie's post. I don't know how else to interpret that. I know that there are some who don't like the hire and aren't giving what they used to, but that is a completely thing from doing so "at the urging of Rick Stansbury."

The refusal to help at all -- and the badmouthing behind the scenes to people that trust him and put him on a higher pedestal than our program overall -- defines what I'm talking about. He doesn't have to tell them "don't give money to MSU" -- he just has to talk down the program and administration to accomplish the same basic goal -- exactly like Ron Polk did.

His actions either help or hurt our program period -- there is no in between -- What has he done to help? Meanwhile we're doing him a favor and allowing him to stay 2 more years and get his full MS pension for insane money.
 

Faustdog

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2007
3,958
2,197
113
I agree with Faust on this one. It would have been awkward.

Isn't it obvious why Stans wasn't at the reunion? He and this cabal of boosters that no one will name were holed up plotting the demise of Mississippi State basketball that day.
 

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
You are full of factual ******** too fish because you have no clue if Ray has called Stans and if so, how many times. I don't think he has called him at all because he has gone out of his way to distance himself from Stans. That is his perogative, but quit posting crap you have no source to validate it.


It's not Ray's fault that Stans is not the coach anymore. It's just ****** not to even make one phone call.
That's just a common courtesy..
 

Faustdog

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2007
3,958
2,197
113
The refusal to help at all -- and the badmouthing behind the scenes to people that trust him and put him on a higher pedestal than our program overall -- defines what I'm talking about. He doesn't have to tell them "don't give money to MSU" -- he just has to talk down the program and administration to accomplish the same basic goal -- exactly like Ron Polk did.

His actions either help or hurt our program period -- there is no in between -- What has he done to help? Meanwhile we're doing him a favor and allowing him to stay 2 more years and get his full MS pension for insane money.

Ok. So in your original post, where you said:

"Nothing vague about it. It's well-known and widespread. What do you want him to give you? A list of megaboosters that are withholding support from the basketball program at the urging of Rick Stansbury..."


You really were just saying that he isn't actively supporting the program, and not that he is urging people to withhold support. Got it.
 

IBleedMaroonDawg

All-American
Nov 12, 2007
25,506
9,722
113
20 years from now someone will casually bring up college basketball in a

conversation around Coach and he will immediately crank up a rant of how a 20+ a year career coach was a douchebag.
 

was21

Senior
May 29, 2007
9,928
581
113
Not only that, but Rick Ray knows how to wear his threads, unlike Stansbury. Look what the dude's wearing sharp today.
 

TheDogfather

Redshirt
Aug 27, 2012
60
0
0
Cowardly post.

In the same vein makin stuff up about yo mamma and posting on the interweb without proof. Post the evidence or shut up. New low
 

rabbitthedawg

Redshirt
Feb 20, 2013
10
0
0
I was one of those who didn't want Rick fired! I know Rick well as a coach and a friend. Rick would not and has never done anything to undermine Rick Ray or Mississippi State. That being said, I was wrong in my assesment of the Rick Ray hire. I have admired what coach Ray has done this year. He has made a believer out of me. Now, he just has to recruit well as Rick Stansbury did and Mississippi State Basketball will be in for a fun ride! I will keep my season tickets and be there!
 

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
Cowardly post.

In the same vein makin stuff up about yo mamma and posting on the interweb without proof. Post the evidence or shut up. New low

It's funny how so many people around here believe the old saying "where there is smoke- there is fire"....you have had a bunch of posters during this basketball season say the same thing. It's not just one poster saying it. But because it's about Stansbury- some of you Apologists want people to name actual names of people- that's ********. You dont do that. We've never called out names of boosters on here

I cant speak for the others, but I'm not about to call out people that have given 6 figures to the University over the years just because they are being a little crybabyish right now and pouting.
 

Philly Dawg

All-American
Oct 6, 2012
12,085
6,657
113
This entire thread shows a general lack of understanding of how you raise money. If you make a change without discussing it with, or obtaining the approval of, the big money boosters, you run the risk of losing their support, at least temporarily. That is the price of doing business and you can't blame the outgoing coach for it because its not his job to raise money from these people anymore. This is why AD's do not normally fire coaches who still have the support of most major supporters. If we are going to raise any more money from these people, then someone else is going to have to create and cultivate the relationship.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
That is the price of doing business and you can't blame the outgoing coach for it because its not his job to raise money from these people anymore.

So, what are we paying him to do right now at MSU?

You can't really expect anyone to start naming boosters on here that have withheld money. That's ridiculous. These are the people that MSU will rely on going forward just like we have in the past -- you don't intentionally burn those bridges any worse than they already are.

This is almost as ridiculous as claiming that Stans ran a completely clean program and using the fact that no one will name heppers as evidence...
 

Faustdog

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2007
3,958
2,197
113
So, what are we paying him to do right now at MSU?

You can't really expect anyone to start naming boosters on here that have withheld money. That's ridiculous. These are the people that MSU will rely on going forward just like we have in the past -- you don't intentionally burn those bridges any worse than they already are.

This is almost as ridiculous as claiming that Stans ran a completely clean program and using the fact that no one will name heppers as evidence...

You're the one that went on a message board and claimed that Stansbury is urging people to not support MSU. If you are going to make that kind of claim, you should be prepared to back it up. Is he calling them on the phone? Are they having clandestine meetings to discuss their nefarious plans?

We know Ron Polk was doing it because he told us in the Clarion Ledger he was doing it.
 

HD6

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
10,019
108
63
I thought that would be Chapter 2.

If I put an end to repetitive ******** on this board, what you post about?
 

lasher8

Redshirt
Feb 13, 2012
1,018
3
38
What is factual ********??

.
You are full of factual ******** too fish because you have no clue if Ray has called Stans and if so, how many times. I don't think he has called him at all because he has gone out of his way to distance himself from Stans. That is his perogative, but quit posting crap you have no source to validate it.
 

ugabully

Redshirt
Feb 10, 2012
316
38
28
I pretty much have favorable feelings about anyone ever associated with MSU, so I tend to be sad more than anything when we change coaches in any sport.

But I think we're being silly in this tread. When part of what causes the coaching change is a sense that the program is out of control, which was the case with both Jackie and Stansbury, the new coach can't really involve the old coach that much. Let's be honest about that. I suspect it was made very clear to Stansbury that he needed to distance himself from the program for a while. And made clear to Ray that he needed to clean stuff up.

And I'll also say, and this is complete conjecture, that Rick Ray doesn't seem like the kind of guy to repeatedly call anyone for help. That part just seem silly.
 

Todd4State

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
17,411
1
0
Is it maybe possible

Absolutely. If you are going to make that charge, you should be prepared to name names. Tell me who these boosters are that are withholding money directly at the request of Rick Stansbury.

that SOME boosters are withholding money because of Stansbury and that SOME are not giving money because they were maybe skeptical of Ray but are going to give it once Ray proves that he is a good coach- which he is doing now?

I personally think that's what is going on.
 

Resolved

Redshirt
May 18, 2008
622
0
0
Jimminy Cricket!! Am I the only only one having trouble accessing Rick's site at the Hall of Fame website?? I just get a blank screen. Maybe I'm banned...?
 

Philly Dawg

All-American
Oct 6, 2012
12,085
6,657
113
He's being paid to get "retired." You don't really think Strickland wants him around the donors, do you?
 

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
I thought that would be Chapter 2.

If I put an end to repetitive ******** on this board, what you post about?

Nahhhhh, Heavy D...Chapter 2 is titled

How to Make One of the Original Sixpack Whine and Bellyache To The Point He Leaves The Board For A Couple of Years
 

HD6

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
10,019
108
63
A real page turner. I'm sure it will be great bathroom reading in the 8th circle of hell.
 

DAWG61

Redshirt
Feb 26, 2008
10,111
0
0
I gotta admit. The on-going beef between you two is quiet entertaining. I picture this beef similar to say a Tony Soprano vs Ralph Cifaretto type beef. Both smirking and saying **** that gets under each's skin like none other.
 

olblue.sixpack

Redshirt
Aug 14, 2012
4,615
0
0
He's being paid to get "retired." You don't really think Strickland wants him around the donors, do you?

It really is amazing how naive some of these people are. Its as if they have no clue how the real world words. Severance packages are intended to sever people - that's why they call them severance packages. They aren't intended to keep a guy around that you don't want around.

Do these clowns think that Bob Knight is spending all of his free time hanging out with Tom Crean?Anybody want to take a stab at how often John Brady drops by the LSU complex? What about Mark Gottfried? How loyal is he to his alma mater?

There is a group of people who are so determined to convince somebody that they were right about Stansbury, that they will stoop to nonsense to do it.