The players who could transfer, may really develop if they got to play more. They could conceivably be really good 4 year players like a Scheyer or Smith. Players that championship teams need. It's the OAD debate I guess. Play 5 star freshmen or develop 4/5 star 3-4 year players.
I don’t disagree that we need a healthy blend of one and done and veteran play. But I think many on here think there is some formula to success that is predictable and sustainable. Do we stop offering people? Do we force Tre Jones or Frank Jackson to return? The amount of people that are leaving after 1 year is going through the roof. And our recruiting has been hotter than any program in history.
Should we be playing more people earlier in the year, arguably yes. But again look at the guys who got a lot of consistent playing time this year, Ques, Javin, Jack. Were they noticeably better at the end of the year as compared to the beginning of the year? Playing time doesn’t necessarily equate to development. Look at the guys who left Duke recently, Jordan Tucker and Derryck Thornton. They are role players at most.
I am ready for the one and done system to be over as well. It’s too unpredictable. But I don’t criticize our coach for being really good at recruiting and then playing the best talent. Small tweaks here or there to playing time, but not nearly the radical changes that most on here want.