The one sticky fact is no other coach has even approached the level of success that Brooks had when he was here for the last 35 years. If you account for the probation Mumme left us with and remove Brooks first three years to rebuild the decimated roster Brooks went 30-22 and 11-20 in the SEC and five consecutive bowl games.
Kentucky may not have been a power house in the SEC under Brooks but we were at least a respectable football program on the rise. That was without todays SEC dollars.
Brooks was a better coach than Stoops is now. I don't see how anyone could argue otherwise. But Stoops has a much higher ceiling. He's recruiting at a level Brooks never did. If he learns from the mistakes he's making now - which you have to believe he will with experience - he has the potential to be a great one.
Brooks was a better coach than Stoops is now. I don't see how anyone could argue otherwise. But Stoops has a much higher ceiling. He's recruiting at a level Brooks never did. If he learns from the mistakes he's making now - which you have to believe he will with experience - he has the potential to be a great one.
You're trolling. You started another thread saying we need to give Stoops more time.I love the recruiting prowess of this staff.
But damnation, some of the crap they do just blows my mind.
This coaching staff looks like grade schoolers compared to Rich Brooks and his crew.
Damn, I just can't stand seeing us look so poorly coached.
Rich Brooks' first 3 years: 4 wins, 2 wins, 3 wins . . . and he had head coaching experience
Obviously you have no idea where UK's football program was with scholarship restrictions when Brooks took overRich Brooks' first 3 years: 4 wins, 2 wins, 3 wins . . . and he had head coaching experience
Rich Brooks' did a nice job rebuilding a decimated roster from the laughable incompetence of the Hal Mumme era (and we are very, very lucky they didn't dig any deeper) but he and his staff plateaued. Outside of Joker Phillips and Randy Sanders they were questionable recruiters to put it mildly overall. Outstanding coaching acumen and player development but the "coach 'em up" attitude that Brooks' cultivated wasn't sustainable in the SEC.
It doesn't matter. The point I was making is that the drums of change were beating louder during Brooks' first 3 years, than they are right now. I realize the 4 straight years of bowls were the glory years of Kentucky football, but lets not pretend it was all glitter and rainbows.