State Dept. to approve Keystone pipeline permit... tomorrow

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,095
675
0


The U.S. State Department will approve on Friday the permit needed to proceed with construction of the Canada-to-United States Keystone XL oil pipeline, a project blocked by former President Barack Obama, according to two government sources familiar with the process.

The move would mark the beginning of process that could be lengthy and complicated by approvals needed by state regulators and legal challenges.

But President Donald Trump, a Republican, supports Keystone and days after he took office in January ordered its construction. That could mean that project, proposed in 2008, will eventually be completed.

White House spokesman Sean Spicer said the administration would provide an update on Keystone on Friday but did not offer any details.

One U.S. government source familiar with the process said on Thursday the State Department was working to get the approval done before Monday, the end of the 60-day timeline under Trump's January executive order for the construction of Keystone and the Dakota Access pipelines.

The State Department's undersecretary for political affairs, Tom Shannon, is expected approve the cross-border permit for TransCanada Corp's pipeline since Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, the former CEO of ExxonMobil, recused himself from the matter.

The multi-billion dollar Keystone pipeline would bring more than 800,000 barrels-per-day of heavy crude from Canada's oil sands to U.S. refineries and ports along the Gulf of Mexico, via an existing pipeline network in Nebraska.

Obama had rejected the pipeline saying it would do nothing to reduce fuel prices for U.S. motorists and would contribute emissions linked to global warming.

TransCanada resubmitted its permit application after Trump's executive order. Spokesman Terry Cunha said the company was working closely with the State Department.

"Monday is the deadline, so that's what we're working towards," Cunha said.

Conservatives said they supported quick approval. Nick Loris, an energy and environment researcher at the Heritage Foundation, said approval would "reestablish some certainty and sanity to a permitting process that was hijacked by political pandering."

Environmental group Greenpeace had pushed for Tillerson to recuse himself from the decision on Keystone, as Exxon could profit from the pipeline. It said it would fight the project.

"We will resist these projects with our allies across the country and across borders, and we will continue to build the future the world wants to see," Diana Best, a Greenpeace climate campaign specialist said.



FURTHER HURDLES

A stretch of Keystone XL also awaits approval from Nebraska regulators. Transcanada has to file its pipeline route plans with the state's Public Service Commission, which is required to hold public hearings on the proposal.

Keystone's construction costs could be higher than the $7 billion estimated after it was first proposed, said Michael Wojciechowski, vice president of Americas oil and refining markets research at Wood Mackenzie.

"Final costs are still to be determined, but they have done nothing but go up over time," he said.

Still, there could also be some savings on labor given recent layoffs due to the recent oil price drop, he said.
 

torontoeers

Freshman
Nov 20, 2010
13,452
71
0
You would I assume admit however PAX that if barrels remain below 50 bucks a barrel which seems to be the trend of late, this pipeline is essentially useless. They can't separate viable oil from the sands at less than 60 bucks a barrel and even that is a stretch. The technology may improve over time but it's not going to be overnight. You would all be better to pump as much as possible from the Gulf in the meantime ...it is easily refinable and quite plentiful...at 50 bucks a barrel this pipeline makes no sense whatsoever. The pits are starting to shut down here at that dollar figure....
 
Last edited:

PriddyBoy

Junior
May 29, 2001
17,174
282
0
...at 50 bones a barrel this pipeline makes no sense whatsoever.
Another way to look at it is Keystone wants to build now while prices are low. The alternative would be to wait until the price goes up and start building when they could be delivering product for a profit. Don't know what the liberalnomics are, but Keystone wants to proceed. It's their money isn't it?
 

torontoeers

Freshman
Nov 20, 2010
13,452
71
0
Another way to look at it is Keystone wants to build now while prices are low. The alternative would be to wait until the price goes up and start building when they could be delivering product for a profit. Don't know what the liberalnomics are, but Keystone wants to proceed. It's their money isn't it?
It certainly is...however there is a lot of oil coming out of current US wells all over the place...something tells me it's a long time till it sees a sound profit. Too bad it wasn't built almost 10 years ago when it was originally on the docket...