Latest TSUN titillation:
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaaf-...s-of-northwestern--mississippi-001611992.html
He admits that he his model is flawed. But his number for TSUN is understated because sending no players to the combine puts your program at *null* (or 119).
On the other hand, I feel that both of our numbers are representative of our season. The better programs in the model were closer to zero, meaning they played closer to their talent level. This shouldn't surprise us given our ***'s 2nd and 3rd recruiting classes. But it is refreshing to know that they are developing players and sending them to the combine in years 4 and 5. It also means that teams (NU and TSUN) overachieved on account of us.
Your spin?
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaaf-...s-of-northwestern--mississippi-001611992.html
He admits that he his model is flawed. But his number for TSUN is understated because sending no players to the combine puts your program at *null* (or 119).
On the other hand, I feel that both of our numbers are representative of our season. The better programs in the model were closer to zero, meaning they played closer to their talent level. This shouldn't surprise us given our ***'s 2nd and 3rd recruiting classes. But it is refreshing to know that they are developing players and sending them to the combine in years 4 and 5. It also means that teams (NU and TSUN) overachieved on account of us.
Your spin?