This, from Mark Stoops' post game commentary:
"It’s very hard to get something turned when it’s toxic and negative. And the criticism, we deserve it sometimes. And that’s, you know that. I sat here and taken it and will. When you deserve to be criticized, you take it like a man and move on. But the toxic, negative stuff, very hard to turn a program when people turn that way, and turn on the kids and turn on the players. Coaches deserve to be criticized. That’s our job, it’s part of our job, but the players and getting toxic and negative and being all that, that’s not going to help get this program to where we want it to go. I promise you."
So, I am trying understand Stoop's justification for now blaming the reaction from some UK fans as the substantial barrier to him getting the program "turned around". He makes $3.5 million dollars a year with millions more dollars guaranteed by contract, he's won 15 lost 27 (37% wins) and in the SEC he is 6-22 (21% wins). Apparently, he simply forgot his coaching debacles at Vandy and Louisville last year, the collapse at Southern Mississippi this year. In spite of these incontrovertible facts, Stoops believes UK fans should not express their disappointment? By far, the vast majority of the "criticism" has been directed at Stoops and his coaching staff, not the players. If he thinks that the predominant "toxic and negative criticism" has been directed towards the players, he is grossly mistaken and deceiving only himself. Moreover, he thinks UK fans have created a "toxic and negative" environment that make "it hard to get something turned" around? Wow! just Wow!
"It’s very hard to get something turned when it’s toxic and negative. And the criticism, we deserve it sometimes. And that’s, you know that. I sat here and taken it and will. When you deserve to be criticized, you take it like a man and move on. But the toxic, negative stuff, very hard to turn a program when people turn that way, and turn on the kids and turn on the players. Coaches deserve to be criticized. That’s our job, it’s part of our job, but the players and getting toxic and negative and being all that, that’s not going to help get this program to where we want it to go. I promise you."
So, I am trying understand Stoop's justification for now blaming the reaction from some UK fans as the substantial barrier to him getting the program "turned around". He makes $3.5 million dollars a year with millions more dollars guaranteed by contract, he's won 15 lost 27 (37% wins) and in the SEC he is 6-22 (21% wins). Apparently, he simply forgot his coaching debacles at Vandy and Louisville last year, the collapse at Southern Mississippi this year. In spite of these incontrovertible facts, Stoops believes UK fans should not express their disappointment? By far, the vast majority of the "criticism" has been directed at Stoops and his coaching staff, not the players. If he thinks that the predominant "toxic and negative criticism" has been directed towards the players, he is grossly mistaken and deceiving only himself. Moreover, he thinks UK fans have created a "toxic and negative" environment that make "it hard to get something turned" around? Wow! just Wow!
Last edited: