TCU QB?
- Thread starter regoratsginrom
- Start date
Slower than Dylan. 4.9. 40 apparently. A better question though is if he is a WILLING runner. You don’t have to be a sub 4.6 guy to be an effective runner from the QB position. Dylan was rarely willing to run.
No, primarily a pocket passer but better pocket awareness than Raiola had this year. He did have 200+ yards rushing this year to Raiola's -89 yards though.
We are not getting a guy of that caliber
Guess that’s the question. Are we looking for a solid player to add to the room or are we looking for a number one guy?
Starter? Hoover would likely be the best passer in program history. Major upgrade from Dylan, guy can sling it and moves in the pocket. Sign him up!
We could play a lot of different QBs and do OK if we had an actual D1 OL.
1. Dude is a pocket passer but all of a sudden NU fans don't care about that.
2. He is off to Indiana
2. He is off to Indiana
well I thought I saw something in the media that said Rhule was favoring toughness over talent.. it led me to believe we are looking for a more running style system, but maybe not. I really think Rhule needs to reset what he wants to do here, as he will be judged on it.
Go with a passing guy, ok, but it better work or fans will have had enough.
Go with a running system, you better dump Dana and get a different OC. Fans will be more patient with getting the running game going if they see progress towards it.
Rhule is kind of in a pickle to be honest.
Go with a passing guy, ok, but it better work or fans will have had enough.
Go with a running system, you better dump Dana and get a different OC. Fans will be more patient with getting the running game going if they see progress towards it.
Rhule is kind of in a pickle to be honest.
I think Miami, Texas Tech, Indiana and LSU will outbid everyone for their guy, after that, I think the market sort of self corrects and the game of musical chairs starts, where a QB doesn't want to be left without a chair when the music stops.
Bring Tom Brady in here tomorrow, won't make the slightest difference overall if there is not a major upgrade to the OL.
Spend money there.
Spend money there.
Do they have to choose either or? Can't it be both?
FWIW, go back and look at the top paid OL from the portal last year. Did any of those guys dominate or provide any positive ROI. Sure they teams they were on had some good records, but were those players provide the value they were paid?
Man, next year...on 3rd and 7...when the QB throws it away too soon. The fans here are going to ******* LOSE it.
"You GOTTA HANG IN THE POCKET"
"You GOTTA HANG IN THE POCKET"
I have no inside information nor clue but am mentally anticipating them to get a former 4 star freshman QB and just going with Lateef next year with Trae battling for starter in 2027. I expect they'll spend more on the lines and hoping that that outcome is more productive than spending a similar amount on a QB alone. Whether that's the right decision or not, I don't know but it's what I'm anticipating. I expect them to try something different due to the 2 year extension and a much more difficult schedule.
Let alone willing to take a couple steps forward or to the side when he sees someone coming right at him. He even willingly just laid down a couple times.
Honest question, is moving from 2025 TCU to 2026 NU a sideways move, upgrade, or downgrade (football, not NIL)?
I think it’s an upgrade to go from any Big 12 school besides Tech and BYU to a Big 10 program
We will never punish opposing defenses like the 90’s and cheat juice. Alabama and Georgia and the legit teams can punish teams, but that’s never happening here again.
and a true financial commitment to bringing in top players and depth