Tebow Bill

DinwiddieProud

All-American
Dec 9, 2013
9,446
7,880
93
2017 SESSION
  • | print version
HB 1578 Students who receive home instruction; participation in interscholastic programs (Tebow Bill).
Introduced by: Robert B. Bell | all patrons ... notes | add to my profiles

SUMMARY AS INTRODUCED:
Students who receive home instruction; participation in interscholastic programs. Prohibits public schools from joining an organization governing interscholastic programs that does not deem eligible for participation a student who (i) receives home instruction; (ii) has demonstrated evidence of progress for two consecutive academic years; (iii) is in compliance with immunization requirements; (iv) is entitled to free tuition in a public school;(v) has not reached the age of 19 by August 1 of the current academic year;(vi) is an amateur who receives no compensation but participates solely for the educational, physical, mental, and social benefits of the activity;(vii) complies with all disciplinary rules and is subject to all codes of conduct applicable to all public high school athletes; and (viii) complies with all other rules governing awards, all-star games, maximum consecutive semesters of high school enrollment, parental consents, physical examinations, and transfers applicable to all high school athletes. The bill provides that no local school board is required to establish a policy to permit students who receive home instruction to participate in interscholastic programs. The bill permits reasonable fees to be charged to students who receive home instruction to cover the costs of participation in such interscholastic programs, including the costs of additional insurance, uniforms, and equipment. The bill has an expiration date of July 1, 2022.


FULL TEXT
HISTORY
 

Clarkefan

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2015
2,293
1,785
113
2017 SESSION
  • | print version
HB 1578 Students who receive home instruction; participation in interscholastic programs (Tebow Bill).
Introduced by: Robert B. Bell | all patrons ... notes | add to my profiles

SUMMARY AS INTRODUCED:
Students who receive home instruction; participation in interscholastic programs. Prohibits public schools from joining an organization governing interscholastic programs that does not deem eligible for participation a student who (i) receives home instruction; (ii) has demonstrated evidence of progress for two consecutive academic years; (iii) is in compliance with immunization requirements; (iv) is entitled to free tuition in a public school;(v) has not reached the age of 19 by August 1 of the current academic year;(vi) is an amateur who receives no compensation but participates solely for the educational, physical, mental, and social benefits of the activity;(vii) complies with all disciplinary rules and is subject to all codes of conduct applicable to all public high school athletes; and (viii) complies with all other rules governing awards, all-star games, maximum consecutive semesters of high school enrollment, parental consents, physical examinations, and transfers applicable to all high school athletes. The bill provides that no local school board is required to establish a policy to permit students who receive home instruction to participate in interscholastic programs. The bill permits reasonable fees to be charged to students who receive home instruction to cover the costs of participation in such interscholastic programs, including the costs of additional insurance, uniforms, and equipment. The bill has an expiration date of July 1, 2022.


FULL TEXT
HISTORY
No home schoolers should be allowed to participate in public school extra-curricular activities. Period.
 

hamspear

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2009
5,128
1,241
33
If your not good enough to deal with the ups and downs of daily school life , your not good enough to play for my team!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DinwiddieProud

shauntclair

Senior
Oct 19, 2008
8,304
623
0
This Bill will come every year. It also gets further every year. Last year, it made it to the Governor's desk. Eventually it will pass. Plenty of folks won't like it but it is inevitable.
 

bulldog1150

Senior
Nov 5, 2001
979
594
0
I agree that as much as don't like it, it is likely inevitable. The current governor might veto it again, but sooner or later, it is going to go through. I don't envy the VHSL trying to regulate it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DinwiddieProud