....We win in dominating fashion, piling up 400 yards, even though we pulled the starters and went conservative in the middle of the third quarter. ...One of your surrogate schools, Arkansas, struggled again mightily, needing a late 4th quarter comeback to beat La. Monroe. Another was beaten by Vandy Thursday night. LSU was off. ...Michigan piles up 281 yards in their prolific spread "offense," impressing all with a 16-6 win over Miami, oh that's right, of Ohio. ...West Virginia, another spread team, piles up 251 yards in a loss to East Carolina. Oh, and they scored 3 points. ....Oh, and Alabama scores one offensive touchdown against Tulane, and were outgained 318 to 172. That means Tulane really won, right? I love football season.
Terrible weekend for Peaches...
- Thread starter DowntownDawg
- Start date
....We win in dominating fashion, piling up 400 yards, even though we pulled the starters and went conservative in the middle of the third quarter. ...One of your surrogate schools, Arkansas, struggled again mightily, needing a late 4th quarter comeback to beat La. Monroe. Another was beaten by Vandy Thursday night. LSU was off. ...Michigan piles up 281 yards in their prolific spread "offense," impressing all with a 16-6 win over Miami, oh that's right, of Ohio. ...West Virginia, another spread team, piles up 251 yards in a loss to East Carolina. Oh, and they scored 3 points. ....Oh, and Alabama scores one offensive touchdown against Tulane, and were outgained 318 to 172. That means Tulane really won, right? I love football season.
1. We dominated a team South Panola might beat, even though we actually didnt push them around like you would think
2. Are you so stupid that you didnt notice East Carolina is a spread team?
3. Yeah, that ****** Bama bunch have two plastic wins
4. Give Michigan time...they are making quite a change in Ann Arbor- not to mention they lost to a 1-AA team last year</p>
</p>
2. Are you so stupid that you didnt notice East Carolina is a spread team?
3. Yeah, that ****** Bama bunch have two plastic wins
4. Give Michigan time...they are making quite a change in Ann Arbor- not to mention they lost to a 1-AA team last year</p>
</p>
When asked earlier about what would be an acceptable offensive output for MSU this year, Coach34 said: "There is no reason why an offense in this day and age cannot average 375 ypg"
YPG Averages for peaches favorite teams/spread offenses after 2 non conference games:
Michigan 242
Alabama 295
West Virginia 302
South Carolina 342
The vast amount of things he is wrong about would be funny if they weren't sad. You kinda feel sorry for the guy.
YPG Averages for peaches favorite teams/spread offenses after 2 non conference games:
Michigan 242
Alabama 295
West Virginia 302
South Carolina 342
The vast amount of things he is wrong about would be funny if they weren't sad. You kinda feel sorry for the guy.
Coach34 said:
You explicitly told me that you could adapt the spread to your personnel and run it no matter what and be successful, and that was "the thing that I was missing". This was in response to me saying that the spread teams were successful mainly because of the players and not the system.
So which it?
I still say that the good teams have good players. (duh.)
but he wants to run a spread thats mostly run-based and doesnt have that type player at QB yet...I think he is being hard-headed and should adjust a little more...you cant blame the offense on his hard-headedness- plus, they scored more last week and lost
lets let them play 4-5 games before we can come to any real conclusions
lets let them play 4-5 games before we can come to any real conclusions
I mean, you were saying that it could work with any personnel, and if you had a drop back passer, all you had to do was just throw more out of it.
That's kind of what I was saying about us. We don't have the people to run that- or really any offense. This year at least, I think we've looked a lot better in general running our WCO plays than we do our little spread plays. Maybe that's because they've run the WCO plays more. I don't know. I think it's because Dixon isn't that great of an outside runner, Wes isn't all that great of a runner, and our o-line sucks.
I think Rodriguez is doing now what Croom was doing about five years ago. Yes, a spread option offense would have worked better with Norwood and Conner, but Croom wanted to run the WCO for whatever reason, and to get players that can run that system, you have to prove to everyone that's what you're going to run. And as a result, we now have players that are more suited to the WCO. Same thing with Rodriguez. He wants to run the spread option, but to get players there to do it, he has to show them that's what they're going to do.
Maybe both of them did that because in college you have some control over the players you get whereas in high school, where you coached you have very little control on who your players are. Maybe that's part of why your mindset is different than them. I don't know.
I remember an article when Ole Miss was recruiting Peyton Manning and Billy Brewer changed OC's in part because they wanted to go away from the option to a more passing offense to get Peyton. Brewer told the newspaper that he was excited because that was the offense he had always wanted to run in the first place. He had been at Ole Miss for 10 years and never installed the offense he wanted to run. I think it was because they were mainly an option type team and that was what everyone though that they were always going to be. I always wondered why he didn't just go ahead and install the offense he really wanted to run anyway so that he could get players in the future that fit the system.
That's kind of what I was saying about us. We don't have the people to run that- or really any offense. This year at least, I think we've looked a lot better in general running our WCO plays than we do our little spread plays. Maybe that's because they've run the WCO plays more. I don't know. I think it's because Dixon isn't that great of an outside runner, Wes isn't all that great of a runner, and our o-line sucks.
I think Rodriguez is doing now what Croom was doing about five years ago. Yes, a spread option offense would have worked better with Norwood and Conner, but Croom wanted to run the WCO for whatever reason, and to get players that can run that system, you have to prove to everyone that's what you're going to run. And as a result, we now have players that are more suited to the WCO. Same thing with Rodriguez. He wants to run the spread option, but to get players there to do it, he has to show them that's what they're going to do.
Maybe both of them did that because in college you have some control over the players you get whereas in high school, where you coached you have very little control on who your players are. Maybe that's part of why your mindset is different than them. I don't know.
I remember an article when Ole Miss was recruiting Peyton Manning and Billy Brewer changed OC's in part because they wanted to go away from the option to a more passing offense to get Peyton. Brewer told the newspaper that he was excited because that was the offense he had always wanted to run in the first place. He had been at Ole Miss for 10 years and never installed the offense he wanted to run. I think it was because they were mainly an option type team and that was what everyone though that they were always going to be. I always wondered why he didn't just go ahead and install the offense he really wanted to run anyway so that he could get players in the future that fit the system.
"I mean, you were saying that it could work with any personnel, and if you had a drop back passer, all you had to do was just throw more out of it."
I said he was being hard-headed and not using his personnel wisely...they threw 13 passes Sat and ran it 30-something times...They only ran about 45 plays which means they didnt have the ball all that much...He needs to adjust until he gets the people he wants in there to run his version of the spread</p>
"Maybe both of them did that because in college you have some control over the players you get whereas in high school, where you coached you have very little control on who your players are. Maybe that's part of why your mindset is different than them. I don't know"
This is because some coaches are die-hard system guys no matter what (see Crooms)...others adapt to their personnel to maximize production out of their offense...I choose the latter</p>
I said he was being hard-headed and not using his personnel wisely...they threw 13 passes Sat and ran it 30-something times...They only ran about 45 plays which means they didnt have the ball all that much...He needs to adjust until he gets the people he wants in there to run his version of the spread</p>
"Maybe both of them did that because in college you have some control over the players you get whereas in high school, where you coached you have very little control on who your players are. Maybe that's part of why your mindset is different than them. I don't know"
This is because some coaches are die-hard system guys no matter what (see Crooms)...others adapt to their personnel to maximize production out of their offense...I choose the latter</p>
Brutius said:
1. I want to pull the thread where I said a team should average 375, because I bet you cant...and that makes you wrong...
2. My favorite teams will always be State, LSU, whomever plays Mississippi, and whichever team I like on offense 4th...that wont change
3. Why you put Michigan and Bama in there i'll never know? If you want to talk Spread teams- lets talk Tulsa, TTech, East Carolina, Oregon, South Fla, Memphis, Oklahoma St and other that are averaging over 500 yards a game right now...
4. I'll bet Michigan in year 1 ranks higher than our offense does in year 5 at season's end...you want some of that?
typical liberal ******** post I had to waste my time replying too
but as soon as I make a bet offer you will come up with some ******** "Actually I'm not totally sure about Michigan I'm gonna have to pass" ******** like you did with HD and USC. You have no balls to actually make a bet that has any consequences.
I picked Michigan because they run a spread offense and they suck. Everyone is supposed to rack up yards with the spread according to you. I picked Alabama because they are 2-0 and averaging less than 300 ypg. I love how they are great at 2-0 with a horrible offense but you bitched all off season about our bowl team because of its bad offense. Memphis is a great team for you to pick as well. They are racking up the offense....and still 0-2.
So to clarify for anyone that is sad enough to have read this far, if your offense sucks and you still win your team is great unless you are MSU. If you have a great offense but still lose, you are better than MSU too. I think that about sums it up for coach34s mentality.
You lose at life.
I picked Michigan because they run a spread offense and they suck. Everyone is supposed to rack up yards with the spread according to you. I picked Alabama because they are 2-0 and averaging less than 300 ypg. I love how they are great at 2-0 with a horrible offense but you bitched all off season about our bowl team because of its bad offense. Memphis is a great team for you to pick as well. They are racking up the offense....and still 0-2.
So to clarify for anyone that is sad enough to have read this far, if your offense sucks and you still win your team is great unless you are MSU. If you have a great offense but still lose, you are better than MSU too. I think that about sums it up for coach34s mentality.
You lose at life.
"You have no balls to actually make a bet that has any consequences."
Ask Ol Blew about that. I'm the reason he aint here no more when he lost his bet...I'll make the same bet with you. Michigan vs good ol MSU on offense...loser leaves the board...you in or not?
we'll see who loses at what here and now
Ask Ol Blew about that. I'm the reason he aint here no more when he lost his bet...I'll make the same bet with you. Michigan vs good ol MSU on offense...loser leaves the board...you in or not?
we'll see who loses at what here and now
I would get more things right talking to my dog and determining if I am right with whether he licks his balls or not than I would listening to you. You really think a team playing a weak *** Big 10 schedule could have a chance to have more offense than a team playing an SEC west schedule? Thank you Nostradamus!!!!!
I was just merely pointing out how you like to apply one theory to 'your teams', yet totally ignore that same reasoning with good ole Mississippi State.
I like to call it the cunt34 theory.
I like to call it the cunt34 theory.
From the original ***** bet welcher, I should take that as a compliment.
Coach34: USC will be a top 20 defense, bank it.
HD6: Ill make you a bet they won't, you lose you get banned
Coach34: Actually um er um, I'm not quite as enthused with USC now, gonna have to be a ***** and not make that bet after all.
I tell ya what, you make that bet with heydog and stop being such a ***** and Ill make your bet with you. Maybe the board can get rid of both of us!</p>
Coach34: USC will be a top 20 defense, bank it.
HD6: Ill make you a bet they won't, you lose you get banned
Coach34: Actually um er um, I'm not quite as enthused with USC now, gonna have to be a ***** and not make that bet after all.
I tell ya what, you make that bet with heydog and stop being such a ***** and Ill make your bet with you. Maybe the board can get rid of both of us!</p>
you bald Democratic va
"I tell ya what, you make that bet with heydog and stop being such a ***** and Ill make your bet with you. Maybe the board can get rid of both of us"
If HD is still man enough to take it, fine by me...its a good chance to shut both of you up...HD signs off, its on...agreed?
"I tell ya what, you make that bet with heydog and stop being such a ***** and Ill make your bet with you. Maybe the board can get rid of both of us"
If HD is still man enough to take it, fine by me...its a good chance to shut both of you up...HD signs off, its on...agreed?
Just so we are straight:
Your bet with HD is you saying USC will finish with a top 20 defense.
My bet with you is you saying The University of Michigan will finish ahead of Mississippi State in total offense (measured via the ncaasports.com website as total ypg).
Now the only question left is what username will you pick when you come back and post after you lose both bets.
Your bet with HD is you saying USC will finish with a top 20 defense.
My bet with you is you saying The University of Michigan will finish ahead of Mississippi State in total offense (measured via the ncaasports.com website as total ypg).
Now the only question left is what username will you pick when you come back and post after you lose both bets.
Coach34 wrote: hell, it was inevitable...I'm almost always right...And it damn sure didnt take a genius to see that Crooms is incapable of putting together a competent college offense. It also wasnt hard to see that hiring someone to be your DC that was a 17'ing WR coach 2 years before is another stupid move... I dont give a **** about SC enough to have a high stakes bet. Doesnt make me a *****...I will however, make a high stakes bet that we dont win 6 games...or break the top 100 in offense...would you like to bet with me...or are you a *****? Never heard back from you, *****. Loser leave the board on this one, too?
Cunt34 sounds about right, since you are obviously more of a **** than a coach. I am guessing if you were a good coach you would not be slinging rubbers right now. It is sad that you are actually excited about MSU losing to Auburn. What a %+**!+$ doltCoach34 said:
...is that when Peaches backed out of his other bet, he said that it sounded better when he was drunk at 4:30 A.M. Check out his post time on this latest ballsy move. What a sad life he leads.
DowntownDawg said:
And you have nothing to do than obsess over his every post and make new threads about him.
DowntownDawg said:
at least do a better job. There is a big difference in coming in drunk at 4:30 am on a Saturday from chasing ho's than not being able to sleep on a Sunday nite...wow</p>
As far as my sad life...i appreciate all the pity and sympathy. It's what keeps me from killing myself. Its hard to even look at a rubber now without crying about not being in a high school classroom anymore teaching your dumbass, whiny kids.</p>