Texas player Cunningham upset over officials call. Claims it was over the back.

[WVUALLEN]

Inutially they did call over the back but it was reversed..

You decide.



I think it was correct call.

 

[The Bell Tolls for Thee]

Inutially they did call over the back but it was reversed..

You decide.



I think it was correct call.

Yup definitely over the back. Good box out technique.

 

[WESTBGVA]

there's no such thing as over the back foul..it's pushing, holding, illegal contact, illegal screen etc..if a player jumps up he/she is to have a landing spot..that is a rule..Miami player could have been called for illegal contact

 

[wvpaper]

tremendously bad call. glad texas lost tho

 

[WVUALLEN]

there's no such thing as over the back foul..it's pushing, holding, illegal contact, illegal screen etc..if a player jumps up he/she is to have a landing spot..that is a rule..Miami player could have been called for illegal contact

To be clear, rebounding a ball by reaching over an opponent’s back is not a foul.

In truth, the foul only occurs when illegal contact occurs. Specifically, when a player uses illegal contact to gain an unfair advantage over their opponent when going for a rebound.

So, the ‘over-the-back foul’ doesn’t truly exist as is named. Rather, the over the back foul refers to the overall process of using illegal contact over the back of the person with inside position to get a rebound.

 

[ROCKALFA]

Inutially they did call over the back but it was reversed..

You decide.



I think it was correct call.

Correct Call . You cannot displace a player by backing him out . Easy call. Retired official of 25 years

 

[wvpaper]

Correct Call . You cannot displace a player by backing him out . Easy call. Retired official of 25 years

define displace in this context