The methodology used is interesting as well. The Athletic used real-life pro transactions to gauge the market. NFL and NBA sales became a benchmark for the SEC. From there, prestige factors like championships, facilities, and population trends all played their role. Using spending numbers from programs can be difficult, though. Programs often have “squishy” reporting for revenue, however, which adds its own challenge. Still, for the SEC, a multiplier range of 5-13x a program’s revenue was used. The House settlement and things like stadium value didn’t come into use.
All metrics are made up.Ok, but this is just a made up metric for clicks.
Agreed. It is obvious bait. &tate is not ranked last*******Ok, but this is just a made up metric for clicks.
We could have come up with the same rankings over a couple of beers at the bar.All metrics are made up.
Some of them even work.
Unless they used AI to generate the numbers…We could have come up with the same rankings over a couple of beers at the bar.
It’s amazing people can still make a living producing click-bait content. AI will make people who produce this kind of content obsolete.
AI would probably predict that the Montreal Expos will win the World Series in the next t 20 years*****Unless they used AI to generate the numbers…![]()
Yea I’m seeing some unrelated AI on other platforms make up some crazy nonsensical stuff.AI would probably predict that the Montreal Expos will win the World Series in the next t 20 years*****
Kentucky no but Vandy and Missouri yes. UK has much larger fan base, wealthier and bigger brand. UK only SEC team in the state. If teams were for sale would you rather own UK or Miss. State?We should at least be above Vandy, Kentucky, and Missouri on a consistent basis.