The CL says we don't miss Dixon

MSUArrowCS

Redshirt
Dec 19, 2006
686
0
0
I've read every post. I don't disagree with the idea that Dixon would have kicked *** on this year's team. There's absolutely no way to back that up because it's hypothetical, but who the hell would disagree with it?

Here are my points, just in case you missed them:
1) It seems most logical to get the definition of "miss" from the articles and posts being discussed and not from a hypothetical "I wish we had Dixon." That definition was if he could be replaced.
2) It's dirt-level ignorant to call people retarded because they don't agree with you on semantics.

That's what I'm talking about. If you think I'm wrong about being able to replace Dixon, it'd be a much more interesting discussion than your proclamation of who's retarded or who needs to be talking with poster X or some ********.
 

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
Bama went from 2nd in scoring D nationally to 5th in 2010
LSU went from 11th in 2009 to 9th in 2010
UPig went from 58th in 2009 to 43rd in 2010
Houston was 95th in 2009 and 96th in 2010
Jackson State? Alcorn? They're both SWAC
Aubarn was 79th in 2009- 54th in 2010
Vandy was 46th in 2009- Georgia was 48th in 2010

Some defenses were better or the same in 2010, some got worse...
 

57stratdawg

Heisman
Dec 1, 2004
148,358
24,133
113
Rivals has Bama #1 in scoring D (11.0 ppg) in 2009 , Florida #3 (11.5), LSU at #12, and OM at #17.

Bama went from #1 to #5 in 2010, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Florida went from #3 to #31</span>, LSU stayed about the same, <span style="font-weight: bold;">OM fell from 17 to 105</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">. </span>Plus, we went from<span style="font-weight: bold;"> #50 GT in 2009 to #115 Memphis in 2010</span>.

We didn't play the same caliber D's in 2010.

Link to my numbers
 

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
as I said, some teams dropped, some got better, and some stayed the same.

They had GT at 56, Bama at 2, Fla at 4, Mississippi at 15 that I remember from 2009...

You said 2009 would bowl in 2010 and I agree with that. But I also think the 2010 team bowls in 2009. This team wouldn't have had Dixon to fumble away the GaTech game, constant turnovers vs Houston, and would have beaten LSU at home last season.
 

Dawgzilla

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
5,406
0
0
Everyone said you would do this, and you did. I asked you for an objective standard before the season, and you said the RBs and QBs this year would account for more rushing yards than the RBs and QBs from last year. You were off by almost 300 yards.

Perhaps YOU didn't miss Dixon, but by your own standard that you agreed to before the season even started, the rest of us are free to have missed Dixon if we wanted to.