The Save Act

bdgan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
4,082
4,100
113
I don't know how many times I have to repeat this, but under the SAVE ACT, you have to re-register in person.
Another Dpic falsehood

Save Act, as written in the House-passed version, does not force every registered voter to re-register en masse it would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when someone registers for the first time or when they update their registration (for example after a move or a name change),

factually.co/fact-checks/politics/does-save-act-require-re-register-to-vote-49f4aa
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,527
20,900
113
Another Dpic falsehood

Save Act, as written in the House-passed version, does not force every registered voter to re-register en masse it would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when someone registers for the first time or when they update their registration (for example after a move or a name change),

factually.co/fact-checks/politics/does-save-act-require-re-register-to-vote-49f4aa
Hey doofus, you just proved me right. Of course you don't have to re-register if nothing has changed and I have repeatedly said that you will have to re-register if you have moved or your name on your license doesn't match your birth certificate.

And that's not a small number:

- Eligible American voters who move every year - 29 million
- Women who have driver's licenses or other identification that does not match their birth certificates - 69 million

Total = 98 million or more than half of all registered voters(
though many of these overlap)


Edit - this could also apply to hyphenated last names..
 
Last edited:

DanaWhitePrivilege

All-Conference
Aug 15, 2021
585
2,448
88
Worst administration of all time, slaves to Israel as I said over a year ago and was laughed at. But the Save Act has to pass, it’s the only way you can keep American elections free. Problem is the bill they’re trying to pass as “the save act” has a million different things in the bill that have nothing to do with voter ID.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,527
20,900
113
Worst administration of all time, slaves to Israel as I said over a year ago and was laughed at. But the Save Act has to pass, it’s the only way you can keep American elections free. Problem is the bill they’re trying to pass as “the save act” has a million different things in the bill that have nothing to do with voter ID.
What makes you say that? We've had free elections for 250 years with an extremely small amount of fraud but suddenly, only because Trump is a whiny *****, this is the most important bill of all time. A bill that will require tens of millions of people to re-register and harshly punish any election worker who mistakenly accepts a non-compliant document with up to 5 years in prison.

And if it does go into effect before the mid-terms, there's no way that everyone who needs to re-register will have done it by then, nor will the systems be updated across the nation in time. If you want it to go into effect before 2028 fine but six months is an attempt to fast-track it in order to help Trump keep from losing his ***. He deserves to lose the mid-terms so tell me again why it's so crucial?
 
Last edited:

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
28,527
20,900
113
This sounds like leftist propaganda. With that said if its true then im happy to do it.
Bullcrap. There is a miniscule amount of fraud and there's no reason to rush this in time for the mid-terms just because Trump is worried he'll get clobbered. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with keeping non-citizens from voting, especially when you consider there have been less than 75 "attempted" instances over 25 years and billions of ballots cast. This is a voter suppression bill, pure and simple, so in effect, it's actually a way for Trump to cheat.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,519
32,545
113
Bullcrap. There is a miniscule amount of fraud and there's no reason to rush this in time for the mid-terms just because Trump is worried he'll get clobbered. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with keeping non-citizens from voting, especially when you consider there have been less than 75 "attempted" instances over 25 years and billions of ballots cast. This is a voter suppression bill, pure and simple, so in effect, it's actually a way for Trump to cheat.
How are you supposing it suppresses vote?