I have been enjoying Aaron Breitman's podcasts and other content on The Scarlet Faithful website.
The Scarlet Faithful Website
- Thread starter NiTeKnight
- Start date
I enjoy Aaron’s content and dedication.
But, as a “note,” I find SOLO podcasts— where the host talks for 15 to 30 minutes straight — rather tedious. Aaron’s podcasts when he was affiliated with On the Banks were more interesting because he usually had either guests or cohosts, and there was interaction and discussion rather than just the host talking into a microphone.
I find the TKR pods much more engaging because it’s two (Mike and Richie) or more hosts, and the discussion is more lively. It’s why I have always enjoyed the Rutgers Rant, because I like the interaction between Politi and his cohosts.
Sorry, but that’s the way I feel.
But, as a “note,” I find SOLO podcasts— where the host talks for 15 to 30 minutes straight — rather tedious. Aaron’s podcasts when he was affiliated with On the Banks were more interesting because he usually had either guests or cohosts, and there was interaction and discussion rather than just the host talking into a microphone.
I find the TKR pods much more engaging because it’s two (Mike and Richie) or more hosts, and the discussion is more lively. It’s why I have always enjoyed the Rutgers Rant, because I like the interaction between Politi and his cohosts.
Sorry, but that’s the way I feel.
Agreed. Love Aaron's content but the solo pods are tough to keep my attention
He would be a great guest for the the Rivals pod to bring on...
My only issue with Breitman is he only posts stuff that anyone who pays attention already knows.
And he posts it like 4 hours later.
And he posts it like 4 hours later.
I haven’t read anything by him in a while bc of what I mentioned early but it wouldn’t surprise me lol.
I even prefer Politi who I think is balanced in his picking and choosing of topics, even if the writing itself is too snide. At least I can ignore the style and get some substance.
Some of the homers out there are just disinformation echo chambers at times though I understand there is a market in the koolaid drinkers.
Lol the guy who commented is "that dave guy"
With all due respect, if you’ve read, watched or listened to a good amount of my coverage over the years, not sure how you think I’m spreading disinformation of positivity. I do have a positive tone no doubt, but I make a point to balanced in my coverage. I wasn’t going to respond to your initial comments but that is utter ********. Watch some of my videos towards the end of the hoops season and let me know how that fits in your narrative of my coverage. Just because I don’t panic and ***** like anonymous message board posters doesn’t mean I don’t keep it real.
Thanks for reading. Please note covering Rutgers athletics is not my career. I am late with some new items but also provide original content. If news breaks and am late I typically do takeaways. I’m not sure which examples you are referring to but all of my basketball coverage is pretty immediate. Like being one of three on the beat to break the Cam Spencer transfer and I had three pieces of content out immediately for Paul leaving. Last night I was only Rutgers writer to cover Caleb’s summer league performance and give a Peach Jam update of Rutgers commits and targets. All I ask is to not give up on my content and appreciate any all feedback. Thanks.
Implying my coverage is part of a disinformation echo chamber for koolaid drinkers isn’t feedback. Accusing me of spreading false information is ****** up.
Bahahaha i love that you tried the “who me? Why are you mad?” Thing here too. At least you apologized this time
It’s the same thing. You are overly critical or negative all the time then someone calls you on it and you respond with “who me?” Or “it’s just feedback” or “it’s just an opinion”. It’s funny at this point. And this time it was actually the author who called you on it and you tried “it’s just…”
Good content...I actually came across the site earlier today before I saw this thread. The article about the ru prospects at the peach jam has great information. Kudos
Ant is my 50/50 partner who approached me to go into business together because he thought I was good. And yes I agree my level of analysis isn’t the same as his. I’m not as good as one of the very best basketball analysts out there and I can live with that. Disagree with being a 100% homer and not offering analysis but appreciate the feedback. I always strive to get better. Thanks.
Last edited:
Thank you for reading, watching, listening and starting this thread.
Exactly. No issue with you saying so and won’t derail a thread just because you said it. No hard feelings
This growth from you in just a few short hours on display in this thread was nice to see. I will now go back and try reading some of your stuff again.