At this point, Pirtle is a better hitter and fielder than Britton. And he can hit the ball out of the park. So he plays. They both can make plenty of improvement, but Pirtle has the highest ceiling for the next two years. But you are right, Britton is a year younger and has more time to break out, and another year to play. But he isn't going to do it overnight. And you can't sit a better player because you think another guy is going to break out.
Take your logic and turn it around. Think about what you're saying. Plus, Britton will have a chance to play next year after Frazier leaves.
I can give you Pirtle over Britton, but you can't say it's not a close race. Pirtle has found a couple of blind squirrel base hits, and has had 10 times the amount of AB's as Britton. I just think it's hard for people to knock him when he hasn't gotten hardly any PT as a sophomore yet. If you're going to allow Pirtle to start the season 3-35 or whatever it was...do you really think Britton would have been worse in as many at bats? I don't.
Basically, all I'm saying is that neither is a great option, but if two players are basically neck and neck I would go with the younger guy that has more potential. If Britton is going to have to potentially play greater innings next year, he isn't going to be much better without some at bats this year. And if Pirtle is your starter, which he appears to be, then why not let Brityon get some cuts against Alcorn?
We've got 10 second baseman and none of them are really worth a **** right now, so I don't really know why we're debating it. Throw their names in a hat and pick one for all I care.