Well there may be a kernel of truth there but it actually could have more to do with their age and experience than ability. I was not anti-Leach and I like some of his methods but he also brings some baggage with him. I think he was treated poorly down at TTU but he did almost nothing to avoid that situation and certainly nourished the environment for such controversy. He can be like a DeMarcus Cousins Lite in the coaching ranks---he can't get out of his own way.
Facts are this, UK plays in the premier conference in the world of college football and when Stoops arrived he had a mid-MAC level of talent on the roster. Thats hard to overcome in a short period of time for anybody. Refer to Jeff Brohms statement of 6 years minimum.
While these opinions are not facts I think they are worth considering.
- The SEC is much better defending the Aid Raid now than when Leach was here.
- The Pac-12 will not defend the Air Raid as well as the SEC
- Leach would not have been as successful recruiting at Kentucky as Stoops has been.
- Linemen are the positions that take the longest to develop
- The dearth of linemen at Kentucky is its biggest challenge
- Unlike Joker Stoops is having to face the challenge of the decimated roster Joker left.
- Leach is 20-29 at Pullman (sorry that is a fact) Which leads us to another fact:
Mike Leach's record at WASU is not as good as Stoops is at Kentucky their first three years. 12-25 vs 12-24