Once again, I could easily see a dramatic change in Hispanic voting patterns with a Rubio presidency. Just as Ronald Ragan fundamentally changed the landscape in the 80s Rubio could do something similar . I'm not saying that he will but it is certainly possible. Keep in mind Hispanics to tend to be very conservative, socially. In a company which I partially owned, we employ more than 50 Hispanics. They want illegal immigration stopped as much as anyone. The reason? Wages. Why would you pay a construction worker 20 bucks an hour when you could easily pay any illegal immigrant 10 bucks an hour.
This is why she'll never be president
- Thread starter WVPATX
- Start date
Once again, I could easily see a dramatic change in Hispanic voting patterns with a Rubio presidency. Just as Ronald Ragan fundamentally changed the landscape in the 80s Rubio could do something similar . I'm not saying that he will but it is certainly possible. Keep in mind Hispanics to tend to be very conservative, socially. In a company which I partially owned, we employ more than 50 Hispanics. They want illegal immigration stopped as much as anyone. The reason? Wages. Why would you pay a construction worker 20 bucks an hour when you could easily pay any illegal immigrant 10 bucks an hour.
I'll make a bet with you about whether she'll be President. If she doesn't get elected, I'll pay for your subscription here the following year. If she does get elected, you can't post on here for the following year. Deal?
Seems that you're afraid to read opinions you don't like. Interesting. You must be a very weak individual. i must admit it takes some intelligence to read things you don't like or can't comprehend.
Let me ask you a question. Is she a better liar or a sexual predator abettor? I must admit I'm envious that she could make a $100,000 profit on a $1,000 investment betting on cattle futures. Her source for her intelligence was the Wall Street Journal, but they didn't report on cattle futures at the time. Hummmmmmm.
Last edited:
Lol, you don't like her. Right. As I said, the weak minded don't want to read things that betray their singular thought. And the really weak want to bet as if that makes them feel like a man.
I could buy and sell you for dinner. You're one weak minded lib. If you're serious, then let's talk serious money. I'll put money in escrow if you're willing to do the same. But I'm not talking $80. Let's go 5 or even 6 figures. I'll put you in touch with my title company that will draw up the contract. Man up.
Like I said. Man up. I'm very willing to place a bet as long as we both put the money in escrow and its large enough to be interesting. Send me your number and we can work out the details.
Placing funds in escrow predicated on a bet would make the contract void and unenforceable; however, my original proposition is still open
Count me in for this. So if Hillary doesn't win then WVPATX gets free usage for two years and if Hillary does win WVPATX can't post for two years.
I don't think Hillary is a lock by any means. She's maybe 50-50. But I'd take a 50% chance of having to pay $100 or whatever in exchange for a 50% chance of a year of not having to read WVPATX's rabidly hyperpartisan drivel.
I don't think Hillary is a lock by any means. She's maybe 50-50. But I'd take a 50% chance of having to pay $100 or whatever in exchange for a 50% chance of a year of not having to read WVPATX's rabidly hyperpartisan drivel.
Quit making excuses. Put your money where your mouth is. I have no doubt we can do this even if the account has to be moved to Nevada. But I can assure you my attorney will fulfill our written agreement.
You're the one making excuses. You were offered a bet and you're trying to wriggle out of answering it.
Hillary loses = you get free usage for a year (two if you include me).
Hillary wins = you can't post for a year (two if you include me).
The chance to not see you on here for a year is worthwhile to me; making documented, illegal contracts is not
Well let's see, first of all I don't believe in God. There are other things but isn't that enough?
Obama will give his spiel about, we want to appeal to all people, black, white, latino, asian, men, women, gay straight, the able, the disabled, yadda, yadda, yadda, yadda, yadda, but how often do you here him put "non-believer in God" in that list?
There are some non-believer Democrats and some non-believer Republicans too, but it's not even close to being a party of either party's line. You said I was in lockstep with the party line. Wrong. I'm also more for free markets then the Democrat line typically is.