*
M MSUDawg4Life Redshirt Aug 22, 2012 235 0 0 Sep 24, 2012 #2 I think it was the right call. A tie goes to the offense.
benatmsu Junior May 28, 2007 2,398 223 63 Sep 24, 2012 #3 What constitutes a tie? There was only one person with possession.
C CopiahDawg Redshirt Sep 3, 2012 28 0 0 Sep 24, 2012 #5 Woww what a finish to the Green Bay vs Seattle game! I love it! Go Seahawks and KJ Wright.
N NorCalDawg Redshirt Oct 8, 2010 314 3 18 Sep 24, 2012 #6 I agree with you, but that was no tie. The way I saw it 15 time, Jennings clearly had possession. Tate only had one hand in there.
I agree with you, but that was no tie. The way I saw it 15 time, Jennings clearly had possession. Tate only had one hand in there.
N NorCalDawg Redshirt Oct 8, 2010 314 3 18 Sep 24, 2012 #7 The officials both saw the same thing, looked at each other and then made completely different calls. Unbelievable.
The officials both saw the same thing, looked at each other and then made completely different calls. Unbelievable.
K KurtRambis4 Redshirt Aug 30, 2006 15,926 0 0 Sep 24, 2012 #8 That was hilarious. It reminded me of the scene in naked gun where the ump calls the guy out and Frank calls him safe, and they eventually get in a fight over it.
That was hilarious. It reminded me of the scene in naked gun where the ump calls the guy out and Frank calls him safe, and they eventually get in a fight over it.
D dogfan96 Redshirt Jun 3, 2007 2,188 12 66 Sep 25, 2012 #9 I didn't see any angle that showed Tate's other hand and where it really was... tenureplan said: Tate only had one hand on it Click to expand... it LOOKED like he only had one hand on the ball, but I can't say that for sure.. only somebody close to the pile could.. that's why it had to stand
I didn't see any angle that showed Tate's other hand and where it really was... tenureplan said: Tate only had one hand on it Click to expand... it LOOKED like he only had one hand on the ball, but I can't say that for sure.. only somebody close to the pile could.. that's why it had to stand
T tenureplan Senior Dec 3, 2008 8,374 983 113 Sep 25, 2012 #10 no It had to stand because possession on a catch can not be reversed via replay.