DawgatAuburn said:
If you can, you would be the first.
Let's be honest. St Louis is as old as the Cubs, and Cincinnati, IMO, doesn't have the pitching to win again. Milwaukee should be better, but who knows how Marcum and Greinke are going to make the transition to a new league. I think the Brewers are hands down the best team in the division, but everyone there is decent except Houston. Even the Pirates are better.
All that being said, there isn't a surefire ML'er in the deal. Archer certainly looks the part, but I think he is at best a back of the bullpen guy. His secondary stuff simply isn't good enough. Guyer could be a late bloomer, but I don't think so. Yes, he put up good numbers next year, but if the Cubs thought that much of him, he would already be up as a 26 year old. Lee can't hit. Period. So, the odds of him playing in the big leagues are very slim. Chirino's, IMO, is the best player there, but he is almost ML ready and the Cubs are solid at his position.
Again, I'm not saying the move was the right move, but I don't think they gave up their best prospects, either. If they had given up Jackson or McNutt, I would be pissed.