Top Offenses & Defenses in 2A

Status
Not open for further replies.

Trevor_Cash

Junior
Aug 30, 2006
1,347
210
0
VHSL changed its format and no longer lists points for an against. That made this much harder to track! I only used the numbers for the 32 teams currently qualified for the playoffs.

Offense:
Richlands(W) 47.87
Buckingham(W)44.87
King William(E) 39.42
Union(W) 37.14
Giles(W) 35.28
Greensville(E) 34.57
Brunswick(E) 34.16
Amelia(E) 34.14
Clarke(E) 33.85
Buffalo Gap(E) 33.42

Defense:
Glenvar(W) 6.28
Appomattox(W) 6.85
Clarke(E) 10.42
Wilson Memorial(E) 11.14
Buffalo Gap(E) 12.42
James River(W) 13
Strasburg(E) 14.42
Richlands(W) 15
Union(W) 18
W&L(E) 18.57


Largest difference would definitely be for Wilson Memorial. 4th ranked defense and 31st ranked offense out of the 32 eligible teams
 
  • Like
Reactions: kwcav4eva

Bigrhsfan

Junior
Aug 28, 2010
239
219
0
It looks like there are only 4 listed in both D and O. Richlands, Union, Clark,and Buffalo Gap.
I don't know if that will have any bearing on who is expected to go deep in the playoffs, but it couldn't hurt to have a strong D along with a high scoring O.
But I guess a lot can go into that also as far as to why a particular team is not listed in both, such as schedule, but I just thought it was interesting.
 

stormwatcher

Sophomore
Nov 27, 2004
112
117
0
The 83 point game between Union and Richlands pushed both further back in the defensive rankings.
 

Trevor_Cash

Junior
Aug 30, 2006
1,347
210
0
Union also gave up 32 in their 3rd game and 27 in their 5th.

Richland gave up 50 combined in their 5th and 6th games.

So it's not just one game hurting their defenses.

But in the other games they have both been very stout
 

kwhs95fan

All-Conference
Oct 17, 2006
7,428
3,477
113
W&L just doing the math in my head has given up around 25 points a game. In their three losses they've given up 43, 41 and 48.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trevor_Cash

Trevor_Cash

Junior
Aug 30, 2006
1,347
210
0
Yes sir.

All states came from MaxPreps and I checked with VHSL to make sure the number of games was correct.

Last year VHSL a points for and points against listed with the rankings so it made it much easier

W&L has given up 43-8-2-48-41-17-14 so you are right. Not sure where I messed that one up at. Knew I should have waited til the morning to go back over these lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: kwhs95fan
Aug 3, 2015
511
256
0
Thanks Trevor for the number crunching. I will be accused of being a homer by bringing this up but of the two I think the defensive stat is more legit for predicting outcomes. Offensive stat is more likely to be skewed by lopsided wins against weak team defenses more than the def
 

VaPrepsRod

Senior
Jul 5, 2008
58,360
580
0
Yes sir.

All states came from MaxPreps and I checked with VHSL to make sure the number of games was correct.

Last year VHSL a points for and points against listed with the rankings so it made it much easier

W&L has given up 43-8-2-48-41-17-14 so you are right. Not sure where I messed that one up at. Knew I should have waited til the morning to go back over these lol

@Trevor_Cash This site is great for numbers though they are sometimes a bit late getting up the most current games

http://www.vhsl-reference.com/
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trevor_Cash

lovethisgame78

Sophomore
Aug 28, 2012
905
181
0
These are never completely accurate of course. It doesnt take in to consideration kick returns, turnovers returned for TDs, OT, and 2nd and 3rd string defenses. For example richlands has allowed 28 points directly from 3 turnovers and 1 kick return. 1 TD in OT. I believe 2nd and 3rd string has given up a couple TDs. Thats 49 points thats not against 1st string defense. But glad you took the time to do this. Gives you a good estimation anyway.
 

singlewinger92

Sophomore
Aug 14, 2004
1,587
197
0
And let's face it, some teams love to play their first Team defense the who game for stats even when blowing a team out.
 

lovethisgame78

Sophomore
Aug 28, 2012
905
181
0
After recalculating, Richland's 1st team D is allowing 8.875 points per game. Im sure others will be lower as well if someone knew how many points were not scored on the 1st team D.
 

Mannschild

Redshirt
Jul 27, 2012
179
27
0
After recalculating, Richland's 1st team D is allowing 8.875 points per game. Im sure others will be lower as well if someone knew how many points were not scored on the 1st team D.[/QUOTE

If this is case I'm sure Richlands offensive numbers need adjusting. I'm sure 1st team offense didn't play the entire game.
 

Mannschild

Redshirt
Jul 27, 2012
179
27
0
Offense looks good on paper, but "Defense" wins Championships. It was evident last year when the top 2 defensive teams Wilson Memorial and Glenvar played in the State Championship. Looks like Appomattox and Glenvar will meet in Salem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trevor_Cash

lovethisgame78

Sophomore
Aug 28, 2012
905
181
0
And let's face it, some teams love to play their first Team defense the who game for stats even when blowing a team out.

Thats true. Theyve had at least 2 kicks returned and a couple ints returned. I believe 2nd and 3 string has scored a couple TDs. Havent kept up with it like the defense. After that i get 42.625.
 

Bigrhsfan

Junior
Aug 28, 2010
239
219
0
Which would mean that they are scoring that amount in about 2 1/2 qtrs per game. Mance is very good at taking out his starters as soon as he feels the game is in hand.
It really helps to give the young guys a lot of experience for the next year and also helps to keep the legs fresh on the starters. The non starters that work so hard during the week also know that they will get to see the playing field on Friday nights if at all possible, which keeps them happy and working hard.
I'm sure there are several teams that do the same, but I have also seen teams that will keep their starters in no matter what the score is and no matter what side of the blow out they are on.
Anyway, I'm sure that the numbers would be different for several of the teams if adjusted for 1st string players only.
 

Trevor_Cash

Junior
Aug 30, 2006
1,347
210
0
People always said that last year too. That the stats were no good because of teams leaving starters in and such.

But in the end two of the top defensive teams from the regular season met in Salem. They were also top offensive teams as well
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mannschild

lovethisgame78

Sophomore
Aug 28, 2012
905
181
0
People always said that last year too. That the stats were no good because of teams leaving starters in and such.

But in the end two of the top defensive teams from the regular season met in Salem. They were also top offensive teams as well


People always said that last year too. That the stats were no good because of teams leaving starters in and such.

But in the end two of the top defensive teams from the regular season met in Salem. They were also top offensive teams as well

I never said they were no good. Just that theyre not completely accurate. Just thought i would take it a step further to represent the defense that will see most, if not all, the playoff time. You did state top DEFENSES. Not top teams for points allowed.
 

singlewinger92

Sophomore
Aug 14, 2004
1,587
197
0
Which would mean that they are scoring that amount in about 2 1/2 qtrs per game. Mance is very good at taking out his starters as soon as he feels the game is in hand.
It really helps to give the young guys a lot of experience for the next year and also helps to keep the legs fresh on the starters. The non starters that work so hard during the week also know that they will get to see the playing field on Friday nights if at all possible, which keeps them happy and working hard.
I'm sure there are several teams that do the same, but I have also seen teams that will keep their starters in no matter what the score is and no matter what side of the blow out they are on.
Anyway, I'm sure that the numbers would be different for several of the teams if adjusted for 1st string players only.
I was not referring to Richlands doing this
 

Hampton Roads 6

All-Conference
Feb 22, 2003
100,672
1,116
0
If Appomattox and Glenvar met in Salem, that would probably be a low scoring game. I have noticed many teams get conservative on offense once they reach Salem. It's as if they play "not to lose" rather than play to win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trevor_Cash

Trevor_Cash

Junior
Aug 30, 2006
1,347
210
0
I unfortunately noticed that last year HR6.


Lovethisgame, the rankings I do are based off of top Defenses for points allowed. It's honestly not completely accurate because it just goes for points against(which includes special teams touchdowns, defensive touchdowns by the other team, etc) but it would be too much work to do it any other way
 
  • Like
Reactions: lovethisgame78
Nov 14, 2014
82
0
6
I certainly hope that there is not any insinuation on your part Trevor that you are going to find WM in the State Championship again based on a "high" defensive ranking.

Secondly.....would you have posted the rankings had WM not been in either one? My gut tells me ......NO!!!
 

RichlandsRyan

Sophomore
Nov 29, 2014
332
182
0
If Appomattox and Glenvar met in Salem, that would probably be a low scoring game. I have noticed many teams get conservative on offense once they reach Salem. It's as if they play "not to lose" rather than play to win.

Richlands doesn't do that lol. Against WM last year w were pulling double reverses and WR passes that hadn't been attempted all year. None of them worked. But we were definitely going for the win. I've seen us pull some gutsy onside kicks and fake punts in semi and finals games in the past.
 

Trevor_Cash

Junior
Aug 30, 2006
1,347
210
0
An if you want my honest opinion a G team won't win the title this year. Unless it's Goochland. I personally think Richlands is the favorite
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevtodd5

VaPrepsRod

Senior
Jul 5, 2008
58,360
580
0
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trevor_Cash
Status
Not open for further replies.