Not much UK going on here
Bro, you keep posting the same ****. We get it. You’re not happy. None of us are. Have a snickers bar and chill out.What’s crazier than that chart and rankings are the people on here who believe we’re going to have a really good team next season.
Truth hurts, there are some on here that believe we’re will have a top five backcourt…our BC won’t even be type five in the SEC let alone CBB.Bro, you keep posting the same ****. We get it. You’re not happy. None of us are. Have a snickers bar and chill out.
In the pre NIL era I would have agreed with you but I know for a fact all four final four teams were in the top 25 preseason and I haven’t looked this up but I’d almost bet that all conference champions for the power 5 were also.Call me crazy, but preseason rankings are more worthless than wet toilet paper. Hell, that sorry bunch we had last year was preseason No. 9. Our NIT team in 2013 was preseason No. 1, same as our 2014 team that lost 13 regular season games (bit atoned for that in the tournament).
Seriously, go look back at preseason rankings the last decade. You’ll always find a team in the top 5-10 who barely makes or misses the tournament and some quality teams completely unranked.
This is not me excusing our roster for next season. On paper it’s not impressive.
This is me saying preseason polls in football and basketball are worthless and nothing more than a fan talking point. Honestly, the first basketball poll should come out in early December and the first football poll should come out after week 4 so there’s an actual body of work to judge and rank instead of paper rosters and “potential.”
Pope is 0-2 against WhiteThat’s only 10 SEC schools above us, not bad. Even Mike White has Georgia in there.
Every post you make is the same negative “We suck- Pope sucks” blah blah blah. We heard ya the first hundred times bro. No need to keep reminding us. Nothing you say is going to make a difference anyway.Truth hurts, there are some on here that believe we’re will have a top five backcourt…our BC won’t even be type five in the SEC let alone CBB.
Wow, I’ve never said anything negative about Pope,Every post you make is the same negative “We suck- Pope sucks” blah blah blah. We heard ya the first hundred times bro. No need to keep reminding us. Nothing you say is going to make a difference anyway.
I don't think they honestly believe what they keep claiming. They appear to have an agenda to run PR for the UKAA here.What’s crazier than that chart and rankings are the people on here who believe we’re going to have a really good team next season.
Just a few years ago UNC was pre season number 1 and didn’t make the tournament. So yea, pre season rankings can be wrong.
Yes and no. If someone is ranked #20 and another #8, in preseason rankings, it doesn't mean much. If a perennial blue blood isn't even mentioned in the top 40, there are clear and demonstrable issues with that team.Call me crazy, but preseason rankings are more worthless than wet toilet paper. Hell, that sorry bunch we had last year was preseason No. 9. Our NIT team in 2013 was preseason No. 1, same as our 2014 team that lost 13 regular season games (bit atoned for that in the tournament).
Seriously, go look back at preseason rankings the last decade. You’ll always find a team in the top 5-10 who barely makes or misses the tournament and some quality teams completely unranked.
This is not me excusing our roster for next season. On paper it’s not impressive.
This is me saying preseason polls in football and basketball are worthless and nothing more than a fan talking point. Honestly, the first basketball poll should come out in early December and the first football poll should come out after week 4 so there’s an actual body of work to judge and rank instead of paper rosters and “potential.”
Wilkins might be the best player next year. Any freshman that can put up the numbers he did can play. I’d be shocked if he is anywhere near as terrible as JJ was. IMO he’ll be better than Aberdeen. My issue is that I don’t see it from the rest of them. Momcilovic probably puts this team in the top 25 but does anyone actually believe he will come to UK? It’s just more of the same. A few good pieces with no star.Unless I misread, Ousmane is not on our projected roster.
Wilkins, Mo Williams, and Hawthorne are both projected to be worse than Jasper Johnson was this past season. Wilkins is an objectively terrible player and getting 60% plus available minutes in the forecast.
We will outdo our projection if Ousmane and/or Wilkins are average players.
We will most likely be better in the frontcourt compared to last season.Wilkins might be the best player next year. Any freshman that can put up the numbers he did can play. I’d be shocked if he is anywhere near as terrible as JJ was. IMO he’ll be better than Aberdeen. My issue is that I don’t see it from the rest of them. Momcilovic probably puts this team in the top 25 but does anyone actually believe he will come to UK? It’s just more of the same. A few good pieces with no star.
In what world?2. OO. - …… Wilkins = same
there is no way we are number 50 in defense. The team doesn t have one player that plays good defense. Shooting is also going to be an issue and I am not sold based on what we have right now that we will be able to defend in the paint or pick and roll either.The Cats currently sit at No. 45 in the country and No. 12 in the SEC. Arkansas (No. 5), Florida (No. 6), Texas (No. 12), Alabama (No. 18), Tennessee (No. 22), Vanderbilt (No. 23), Georgia (No. 29), Missouri (No. 37), Auburn (No. 39), Oklahoma (No. 40) and Texas A&M (No. 41) all rank ahead of the Wildcats in the way-too-early projections. Torvik just doesn’t see it for the Cats quite yet, grading them No. 44 nationally in offense and No. 50 in defense...
Proof is that Wilkins can play Point guard & is a team first player with big upside.In what world?
Is that your score prediction for the first half of the Kansas game?Going to shock the world. 40-0
Wilkins, Mo Williams, and Hawthorne are both projected to be worse than Jasper Johnson was this past season.