Trump Tariff Stimmys - $2,000

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,032
1,633
113
First...it is a diversion for the masses to get their minds off Epstein files.

Second, it is also intended to get the masses off of the higher prices we pay for food.

Finally, if the Supreme Court says no, the President can't set tariffs, only Congress can (as the U.S. Constitution stipulates) then no one is going to see it anyway.
and you know, are certain of these things, how?
From what I read on here, certain posters bring up Epstein and high food prices almost daily, are they not part of the "masses" of which you speak?

Not sure what your last sentence means
 

tboonpickens

Heisman
Sep 19, 2001
17,637
28,932
113
and you know, are certain of these things, how?
I mean, come on Ned...it's pretty obvious what is happening.

You sound like the guy on here yesterday making excuses for Trump when Trump/Patel/Bondi/Blanche summoned Lauren Boebert into the damn Situation Room to pressure her to not sign the petition to release the Epstein Files. He kept saying he had no opinion on it because he wasn't in the room so he didn't know what was being said 🙄.

Everyone in the world with a brain knows what was being said in that room. If we're only allowed to comment on topics where we have direct involvement with the highest levels of politics, then this forum wouldn't need to exist.

I'm pretty sure Trump doesn't discuss his motives and missives with you personally, but that doesn't stop you from defending his actions 99.9999% of the time despite claiming to not be MAGA.

You are permitted to apply common sense and the smell test to some of these matters.

Judy Sheindlin GIF by Judge Judy