Under Diaz, I was thrilled with so much of our defensive philosophy, but . . .

DawgNDCity

New member
Jun 4, 2009
52
0
6
I never understood why we didn't play our corners tighter to the opposing teams receivers. I realize that our DB's were young and often out-matched, so playing off kept us from getting burned, but to me playing tight was well worth the risk. We are a blitzing team (which I like very much) but the blitz is designed on passing downs to overwhelm the quarterback and make him rush a bad throw or get sacked. By playing off and giving a cushion of sometimes 10 yards or more, it seems that we make it too easy on the quarterback to quickly find the open man. If it's 3rd and 8 and we blitz, all we need to do is make it look like the receivers are covered for a few seconds. The quarterback must get the ball a way in a hurry. He doesn't have time to check down to his third receiver or he'll generally be sacked and if we're tight on their men then the chances of him throwing us the ball drastically increase. It's intimidating to have inebackers and safeties like KJ, White, and Mitchellbreathing down your neck but that pressure greatly decreases when you look out to the flats and see your men being given a substantial cushion and you only need a few yards for the first down.

Sure, sometimes they call the right protection and route and you'll get burned, but more times than not you can cause a sack, fumble, or interception. My hope is that Wilson and Collins will continue the blitzing as they have indicated, but also trust our now more expereinced DB's enough to play a little tighter in more situations so that we can get the ball back a little quicker this year. If you remember, last year people drove down the field a lot, but then our defense stepped up inside the 35. I like to bend but not break, but I like not even bending much even better.
 

therightway

New member
Aug 26, 2009
1,801
0
0
Most of the time in a zone defense your corners are going to be playing 8-10 yards off the line unless it is a cover 2.
 

DawgNDCity

New member
Jun 4, 2009
52
0
6
Listen, I'm not claiming to know more than Diaz or be a better coach. And I'm not owed an explanation for why we did this and why this is so necessary in a zone-base defense as the previous post explained. Nevertheless by observation it appeared that despite our blitzes it was extremely easy to earn a first down on third and relatively long. I was saying what I hope would happen and seeking a rational explanation rather than a smart comment from you.</p>
 

seshomoru

Active member
Apr 24, 2006
5,520
139
63
DawgNDCity said:
Listen, I'm not claiming to know more than Diaz or be a better coach. And I'm not owed an explanation for why we did this and why this is so necessary in a zone-base defense as the previous post explained. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Nevertheless by observation it appeared that despite our blitzes it was extremely easy to earn a first down on third and relatively long.</span> I was saying what I hope would happen and seeking a rational explanation rather than a smart comment from you.</p>
We were 15th in the nation in 3rd down conversion defense.

So, I guess we're hoping for a more rational question.
 

Shmuley

Well-known member
Mar 6, 2008
23,287
8,562
113
going on the D side in terms of effort, energy and, ultimately, recruiting high caliber athletes to fit the system. But anyone who thinks we didn't lose much when rico suave bolted for the bigtime is fooling themselves.
 

codeDawg

Member
Nov 13, 2007
2,102
0
36
In order to do that he brings the heat up front and keeps the backfield on a cushion so that they don't get burned. The ideal situation on a passing play is a sack or a bad decision to throw into coverage. He will give up the shorter pass plays all day knowing that the home run is covered and that at some point he will create the negative yardage play that most often results in a fourth down on the drive.

This is why his defenses are so high in the rankings for scoring defense, but aren't much to write home about in yards allowed.
 

Big Sheep81

Member
Feb 24, 2008
2,127
53
48
There are very few teams that neither bend nor break. When I say very few, I mean only one or two teams a year. Players bust coverages, coaches make wrong calls or guesses, etc. What you want to see is no first downs or touchdowns allowed. That ain't gonna happen. Not by us for a while anyway. Talent is one reason, depth another, and still some lack of experience another. Wilson will be ok. He and Diaz were more alike than not.

Fans are entitled to grouse and gripe about "why don't we do this or that". Bottom line is we don't get to make the calls. But hey, it's more fun to ***** than to say "Damn, that was a great call".
 

MStateFan22

New member
Aug 30, 2010
664
0
0
When you blitz on passing 3rd downs your gonna give up some first downs. Still better than sending 4 and giving QB time to read the whole field and wait for someone to be open. The longer the play last then the harder it is to cover receivers and our secondary was still pretty young last year.
 

Foronce

New member
Mar 26, 2008
2,069
0
0
is one reason why we didn't pull our corners in tighter ...not because he isn't talented, but he was the best we had...

he came from playing safety and qb, his coverage skills were lacking when you face him up against top WR in the SEC


A true corner is hard to find!


another reason we give up stuff on some key 3rd downs, was because toast was in...
 

Big Sheep81

Member
Feb 24, 2008
2,127
53
48
If your rush doesn't put pressure on the QB, if somebody slips or turns the wrong way, or an OL makes a great block, SOMEBODY is going to be open or a running lane will open up. Stuff happens and you put it behind you and move on.